Pages

Pages

Friday, September 09, 2011

Rep. Allen West :"SACRIFICED SURVIVORS: The Untold Story of the Ground Zero Mega Mosque,"

REP. ALLEN WEST
West promotes film about controversial Ground Zero mosque
Rep. Allen West drew media attention when he hosted an event to promote a film critical of a the planned construction of a controversial mosque near the World Trade Center twin towers attacked on 9/11.
By Erika Bolstad
ebolstad@mcclatchydc.com
9 9 2011Allen-West WASHINGTON -- U.S. Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., no stranger to controversy for his remarks about Muslim-Americans, on Wednesday renewed the debate over the Islamic center near Ground Zero in New York City, just days before the country marks the 10th anniversary of the terrorist attacks.
West, who sponsored the screening of a movie about the opposition to the Islamic center, said he hosted the event because he believes the center’s backers have a moral responsibility to honor the wishes of the families of the victims of the attacks who don’t want it near what will soon be a public memorial to those killed.
"If 10 years, or nine years after Pearl Harbor, if the country of Japan had come to the United States of America and said ‘we want to erect a memorial to Japanese naval seamanship at Pearl Harbor,’ what would we have said?" West said. "Decades from now, centuries from now, we much remember what happened on Sept. 11, 2001."
The film, "SACRIFICED SURVIVORS: The Untold Story of the Ground Zero Mega Mosque," was produced by Martin Mayer of the Christian Action Network, and shown in a conference room in the Rayburn House Office Building across from the Capitol.
The film’s producers bill their movie as a depiction of how "survivors and family members are experiencing yet another type of Islamic jihad."
Survivors, the filmmakers said, "believe they must work to keep people vigilant and fighting against the march of radical Islam," including efforts to build the center two blocks from Ground Zero.
West, whose district includes Broward and Palm Beach counties, was criticized by religious leaders in January for saying that Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the first Muslim member of Congress, "really does represent the antithesis of the principles upon which this country was established." West said at the time he was referring to Ellison’s support of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which has asked West to disassociate himself with some people the organization thinks are anti-Muslim.
At Wednesday’s press event, West was flanked by about a half-dozen relatives of people who died in the terrorist attacks.
Alice Hoagland, whose son Mark Bingham was among the 44 passengers on United Flight 93, said the developers should reconsider their plans. The proposed community center and place of worship, is in an old Burlington Coat Factory two blocks from where the World Trade Center stood when two hijacked planes crashed into the twin towers.
"This is not a legal question," Hogland said. "There is no question that anyone in the United States has the right to express his religious beliefs. There is no question that they have the legal right to build within two blocks of the site where 2,977 or so people died at the hands of Islamist terrorists. The question it seems to me is the moral right."
West again likened the attack to Pearl Harbor, and pointed out that 2011 is also the 70th anniversary of the Japanese attack that led the U.S. into World War II.
"We must never let events like Pearl Harbor or 9/11 go away," he said. "We must never forget the things that happened those two days, or the attack upon the United States of America. My fear is that maybe we could end up forgiving what happened on 9/11 because of certain things, this political correctness or this desire to be a multicultural America."
One man, Bruce DeCell, held up a photo of his son-in-law who was killed on 9/11, and said he wanted to tell people that "we are at war with the Islamic culture."
West didn’t disagree with him publically, but said later that he believes there needs to be "a recognition of some concepts, such as Sharia, that are the antithesis of what we believe in here in the United States of America," he said, referring to a system of Islamic law.
"I don’t think it’s a war on a culture," he said, "but I think we need to recognize some of the ideological differences that separate us, and if you want to get to a point of having peaceful coexistence, I think it’s where they need to reform some of these things."
Although billed as a press conference before the film’s screening, most of the people asking West questions were those tied to the movie or participants in a panel the filmmakers and other groups were organizing later in the day.
West didn’t disagree with those asking questions at the event, including one man who suggested that "Islam has a history of building victory monuments on places it has triumphed."
"Throughout the history of Islamic conquest, you do see the same type of parallels," West said, citing his recent trip to Israel and Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, a spot sacred to Muslims, Jews and Christians alike.
The debate over the Islamic center’s future in New York City has largely quieted since its height last summer. The project’s developers told the New York Times in August that they have hired a paid staff and begun raising money. They continue to hold prayers and events in the building, and its developers told the newspaper it could be as long as five years before they begin the sort of project first envisioned.
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/09/07/2395271/west-promotes-film-about-controversial.html#ixzz1XNMSf06w

 
Sacrificed Survivors Trailer
 
 
How a Man answers a question from a Marine regarding the greatest threat to civilization since their former partner in crime Adolph Hitler was crushed
 
Thanks to USA resident and Aussie News & Views subscriber Susan, for the above story.

Multicultural Sydney where every day is a “Harmony Day” for Multicultural Paedophiles and sexual deviants

Predator Hematullah Shafei free to stalk his prey

Katherine Danks 
The Daily Telegraph

September 09, 2011

SENIOR police have called for tougher laws to protect children from perverts as a man avoided jail for a second time for trying to lure girls into his car.

Detectives called for a new law to deal specifically with offenders attempting to lure children into cars, saying existing laws were either not tough enough or were difficult to prosecute.

Hematullah Shafei, 19, received a seven-month suspended sentence after pleading guilty to intimidating a 15-year-old girl.

Copy of 9 9 2011 Predator Hematullah Shafei free to stalk his prey 

He was already on a good behaviour bond for committing the same offence just months earlier. Angry police said the only charges available to them in such cases were attempted kidnapping - which

requires proof of intent - or intimidation, which carried a lesser sentence.

A police source yesterday said a specific offence for attempting to lure a child into a vehicle, which carried tougher penalties than intimidation, would tighten the legislation.

A submission along those lines to NSW Police Legal Services division four years ago had not been acted on.

The Daily Telegraph in July revealed a frightening trend of "stranger danger" incidents, with a child approached every two days. Since then, another 11 child approaches have been reported to police.

Police yesterday revealed a 15-year-old boy was sexually assaulted after being grabbed by a man of African descent and forced into a toilet in a park in Sydney's west.

Senior officers yesterday revealed they were increasingly frustrated by the tough legal requirements needed to prove the more serious charge of attempted kidnapping.

Police Minister Michael Gallacher last night said he was "open to any suggestion by police if they identify a weakness" in existing laws.

Petition - it's time to save Our Children

"The welfare of children is paramount," he said.

A senior police officer said that offenders were usually charged with intimidation, however "what you are really dealing with here is attempted kidnapping - but it's impossible to prove because you can't

show intent".

Child-welfare group Bravehearts said sentences should protect children and reflect the seriousness of the crime. "We support tightening legislation or introducing a new law if current laws are inadequate," a

spokeswoman said.

Former assistant police commissioner Clive Small said people who tried to lure children into cars were usually serial offenders. He said the existing legislation was adequate but courts were failing to impose

suitable sentences.

Another “Harmony Day” as Australian Judge acquits Muslim who admitted to preparing a terrorist attack.Police Officer shot,but Judge Flannery said she accepted that he had felt panicked and had been feeling sick on the day.

Terrorism suspect acquitted after police officer shot during arrest

SMH

Geesche Jacobsen Legal Affairs
September 9, 2011

WHEN police were ready to arrest a man suspected of terrorism offences in November 2005, they sent in four local officers who had no knowledge of the investigation. They were given a description and

headed down the street while still on the phone to an officer from the terrorism squad.

What happened next has been subject to conflicting evidence but it ended with shots fired in the street in south western Sydney - one bullet hit the terrorism suspect in the neck, another grazed the hand of

one of the police officers.

The man, who cannot be named and is known only as BUSB, later admitted he was doing things to prepare for a terrorist act and was motivated by his religious beliefs.

The Herald can now report details of what happened during his arrest by four officers from Green Valley police station - two sergeants and two senior constables: one of those a crime prevention officer,

who usually spoke to community meetings, the other a traffic, warrants and summons officer.

When their car pulled up next to BUSB, the two junior officers had trouble getting out of the car: one could not open her car door because of a child safety lock, another struggled with her seat belt. None of

the officers was wearing body armour and only one appeared to have his firearm drawn. He later said he approached the man, saying: ''Mate, hang on a minute. Can we have a word?''

Within seconds several shots had been fired, the two men were hit and BUSB was arrested and charged. Earlier this year BUSB finally faced court on charges he had shot at one of the officers. Witnesses

gave conflicting evidence about what they remembered. BUSB maintained he had intended to fire a warning shot as he swung around, and had not realised an officer was behind him.

After a judge-alone trial, Judge Leonie Flannery acquitted him, ruling she could not be convinced that this had not been the case. Judge Flannery said she accepted that he had felt panicked and had been

feeling sick on the day.

''I am not satisfied that he put the Browning [firearm] in his pants because he was planning to shoot his arresting officers, but … his concern that he was going to be arrested and the climate of anti-Muslim

feeling in the community at the time, he believed that he might be harmed by police. I consider it is a reasonable possibility that he did not deliberately shoot in the direction of [the officer], intending to

hit him.''

BUSB was not charged with lesser firearms offences and was acquitted of all charges relating to the shooting.

Its now ok for Muslims to shoot Australian Police officers if they feel threatened by Police or feel you could be harmed by Police.