Respect THIS !!!! INFIDELS !!!!! UPDATE Lubna Ahmed al-Hussein

Forty lashes for female journalist wearing trousers

The Daily Telegraph
July 15, 2009 12:00am

A HIGH profile Sudanese woman journalist is facing 40 lashes after being accused of wearing "indecent" clothes, with 10 women already whipped for similar offences against Islamic law.

Lubna Ahmed al-Hussein, who writes for the left-wing Al-Sahafa newspaper and works for the media department of the United Nations Mission in Sudan, was arrested in Khartoum last week and charged with dressing indecently.

Ms Hussein said she was at a restaurant on July 3 when police came in and ordered women wearing trousers to follow them to the police station.

"They took away me and 12 other young women, including southerners," she said, referring to women from Sudan's animist and Christian south where the Muslim north's Islamic or sharia law does not apply.

"Two days later, 10 of them were summoned to the police station in downtown Khartoum and given 10 lashes each," Ms Hussein said.

The remaining three women, including Ms Hussein, have been charged under Sudanese law with "committing an indecent act or one which violates public morality or wearing indecent clothes".

If convicted, they face a mandatory 40 lashes. Ms Hussein said she did not know when her case would be heard.

"I want people to know what happened," she said.

Unlike some countries in the region, particularly in the Gulf, women have a prominent place in Sudanese public life. Nevertheless, human rights organisations say that some laws discriminate against women.

Hussein Obama's Science Cszar : We will need to surrender national sovereignty to an armed international police force

John Holdren, Hussein Obama's Science Cszar.

Hold on to your hat,Hussein Obama is just starting to feel in charge of the United Serfdom of America,Please read the following report brilliantly compiled by Zombietime
If you read NOTHING else this month read this article, it fully exposes the International Socialist, NAZI mindset and their commitment to finish what they started in 1939.
They have regrouped and are ready to go again,only this time they are in control of the White House.

See: Hussein Obama's Agenda 21 or how we are all going to live in peace with each other and the environment

Yes,I know,I put it up before but this time READ IT, the authors have been warning Free men and women of the plans the Enviro Nazi's have for mankind for years.

" Individual rights. Individual rights must be balanced against the power of the government to control human reproduction. Some people—respected legislators, judges, and lawyers included—have viewed the right to have children as a fundamental and inalienable right. Yet neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution mentions a right to reproduce. Nor does the UN Charter describe such a right, although a resolution of the United Nations affirms the "right responsibly to choose" the number and spacing of children (our emphasis). In the United States, individuals have a constitutional right to privacy and it has been held that the right to privacy includes the right to choose whether or not to have children, at least to the extent that a woman has a right to choose not to have children. But the right is not unlimited. Where the society has a "compelling, subordinating interest" in regulating population size, the right of the individual may be curtailed. If society's survival depended on having more children, women could he required to bear children, just as men can constitutionally be required to serve in the armed forces. Similarly, given a crisis caused by overpopulation, reasonably necessary laws to control excessive reproduction could be enacted.

It is often argued that the right to have children is so personal that the government should not regulate it. In an ideal society, no doubt the state should leave family size and composition solely to the desires of the parents. In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?"

Read full expose' of the Godless evil that now has control of the White House at : Zombietime