Labor Green Loon Australian Senator supports Indonesian demands Australia cease defending it's borders and The Gifts of Multiculturalism

Australia: Alan Jones interviews Janet Levy on her American Thinker article, The Narrative of Defeat.

 

The Narrative of Defeat

By Janet Levy
American Thinker
May 09, 2010

It is now life-threatening to criticize or mock Islam in the United States of America. The creators of South Park, Viacom, and anyone associated with the production of a recent episode portraying Mohammed in a bear suit would have potentially risked life and limb if they had broadcast the original cartoon sketch. In a manner eerily reminiscent of the Danish cartoon jihad, a Brooklyn-based Muslim group called Revolution Muslim posted a threat to South Park creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker for their "outright insult" to the prophet.

"We have to warn Matt and Trey that what they are doing is stupid, and they will probably end up like Theo van Gogh for airing this show," read the post. Theo Van Gogh was the Dutch filmmaker who was murdered by a Dutch-Moroccan Muslim for producing the film Submission, critical of the treatment of women in Islam. Like Salman Rushdie, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Geert Wilders, and targeted infidels before them, life would have been reduced to an unending fielding of threats and the heavily guarded jockeying between safe houses for those associated with South Park if the episode had aired unaltered.

Alan Jones Janet Levy, Radio 2gb Sydney May 14 2010

The incident underscores the unceasing efforts by Islam to silence opposition and criticism in order to advance the establishment of a worldwide caliphate under Shari'ah law. Despite incidents like these, we in the West continue to react to Islam as if it were merely another variety of religious faith. Descriptions of Islam as a "religion of peace" and as "one of the three Abrahamic faiths" proliferate, obfuscating the need for further study and shielding the immutable, intolerant, militant, murderous doctrine from discovery. Although it's been almost nine years since 9/11, the level of knowledge and understanding of Islam is staggeringly low among the general population, let alone those sworn to protect us -- our military and intelligence services. At a time when the Western world should be intimately familiar with the concepts of jihad and dhimmitude, as well as the provisos of Shari'ah law, we are lulled back to sleep with platitudes of peaceful coexistence and shamed with charges of "Islamophobia" if we question the motives, demands, or practices of adherents to the Muslim faith.

Quite illogically -- given the sequence of events from 9/11 forward -- the very act of exhibiting fear or suspicion of Muslims is dubbed a "phobia" -- an irrational fear. This, after nineteen Muslims hijacked planes and flew them into buildings, exacting massive carnage in the name of their god, and afterward, their coreligionists feted the deed. The carnage has continued nonstop since then in other countries. In 2002, Muslim jihadists set off three bombs in Bali, killing over 200 people and wounding 240. In 2004, Islamic practitioners orchestrated a series of coordinated attacks against Madrid's commuter train system,  claiming 200 lives and injuring 1,800. The following year, suicide attacks in London's public transportation system during the morning rush hour resulted in 52 deaths and 700 wounded. In 2008, Muslim terrorists held India's most populous city hostage for three days with a string of more than ten shootings and bombings at a hospital, cinema, college, and Jewish center that left 175 dead and over 300 injured. These are just a few examples among hundreds of recent attacks by Muslims worldwide.

Yet we in America shrink from charges of Islamophobia and fail to acknowledge our righteous apprehension of unthinkable acts of evil in the name of a vengeful and certainly not peaceful god. We allow ourselves to be censured and plead guilty as charged of Islamophobia for scrutinizing the activities of Muslims and placing blame on the canons of Islam. The joy and celebration from Muslims across the world following the mass slaughter and destruction of 9/11 should have put us over the edge and strengthened our resolve to eradicate followers of this deadly belief system. Instead, we exhibit suicidal insanity in our failure and unwillingness to connect the dots of Islam, jihad, and Shari'ah. We dither, apologize to the enemy, and shrink from rightful condemnations of their holy books, their religious practices, and their legal code.

No other religion on earth exists with a holy book dominated by hatred toward non-believers. The Islamic trilogy -- the Koran, the Sira (or biography of Mohammed), and the Hadith (the words and deeds of Mohammed) -- requires jihad, the killing of infidels, as the highest form of devotion to Allah. Islam is a theo-political-legal doctrine whose primary focus is not on the "goodness" of Muslims, but on others -- evildoers who do not share the Islamic belief system. Certainly the Old and New Testaments offer their fair share of brutal passages, but the practices described within those passages haven't been in evidence for centuries. The brutal practices contained within Shari'ah law are practiced today throughout the Muslim and non-Muslim worlds, even in the United States.

Christians suffer through confession and acts of repentance for untoward acts that hurt others. Christians aspire to exemplary kindness and service to their fellow man for the privilege of escaping a hellfire-filled afterlife. Jihadists are awarded a guaranteed place in heaven and the promise of great reward for the holy act of murdering those who don't believe. While Jews practice "tikkun olam" -- repairing the world -- and perform "mitzvoth," or good deeds, devout Muslims pray to Allah for inanimate objects like rocks and trees to alert them to the presence of dastardly Jews. They pray, "O Muslim there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him." Muslim world leaders and clerics routinely call for the death of non-Muslims. Has anyone ever heard a Western prime minister, president, rabbi, or priest call for the annihilation of a country or for the destruction of practitioners of other religions?

The Koran contains over four thousand verses of enmity toward non-believers. Over 63% of the Koran instructs Muslims to hate and avoid any association with non-Muslims. It teaches that non-Muslims should be held in contempt, killed, beheaded, humiliated, raped, enslaved, converted, or forced to pay the jizya or dhimmi tax. Eighty-five percent of the Sira -- the biography of Mohammed, the ideal man or moral icon for Muslims -- has to do with his battles against kuffars, or non-believers. This is a far cry from "Jesus died for your sins." Islamic teachings laud and require lying and deception, "taquiya," to advance the "ummah," or Islamic community. While Jews and Christians honor the Golden Rule, turn the other cheek and practice tolerance and inclusiveness, Muslims learn how to fight the Dar al-Harb, the infidel world of war, and practice the artistry of duplicity not only with impunity, but also with the highest praises from their god.

Let's not lull ourselves into complacency by citing that out of 1.57 billion Muslims worldwide, many are secular or have little knowledge of Islam. Although this may be true, that still leaves, conservatively, 10% to 15% (upwards of 235 million) of devout Muslims or jihadists who fit the description of submissive and intimidated, witting or unwitting enablers. As Mark Steyn astutely observed in America Alone, a "dominant minority" is the sole requirement for global jihad to take hold. In Mumbai, the carnage wreaked was caused by just ten people over three days. Nineteen hijackers were able to commandeer four passenger planes and murder three thousand Americans on 9/11. It doesn't take huge numbers to institute evil. In Nazi Germany, Hitler didn't win popular support in the country, but he pushed through his genocidal agenda as a passive, fearful populace looked on.

In our free society with a tradition of openly criticizing everything, even the sacred, it has now somehow become unacceptable to criticize Islam and the heinous actions of many of its practitioners. Yet it is perfectly acceptable to criticize Christianity, Judaism, or any other religion, for that matter. In 1989, "Piss Christ," an offensive photograph of a plastic crucifix submerged in a container of urine, was prominently displayed at a museum and won a U.S. government-funded award. While members of Congress and clerics condemned the sculpture in the media, the most egregious responses were from a museum patron who attempted to dislodge the photograph from the museum wall and a pair of teenagers who attacked it with a hammer. By comparison, in 2005, when editorial cartoons depicting Mohammed were published in a Danish newspaper, the Muslim world erupted into violence that claimed over one hundred lives and destroyed property worldwide, including four Danish embassies. Instead of reinforcing the Western value of free expression and severely punishing the actions of destructive Muslims, Westerners apologized for giving offense, censored the display of the cartoons, and cautiously monitored any future examination or critique of Islam.

Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna said,  "It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated; to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet." The work of the Muslim Brotherhood in America is "a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

It is now five minutes to midnight in the global jihad that endeavors to destroy us and establish a worldwide caliphate under Shari'ah law. Instead of standing our ground and asserting the supremacy of our values, our fear and submissiveness have taken root to hasten our defeat. Will we wake up and face the enemy head-on before it is too late and all is lost?

 Dangerous Racists

Technorati Tags: South Park,Viacom,Mohammed,taquiya,ummah,Dar al-Harb,Mark Steyn,Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna,Shari'ah law.worldwide caliphate,Koran instructs Muslims to hate,kuffars,Islamophobia,Theo van Gogh,Piss Christ,Revolution Muslim,Salman Rushdie,Ayaan Hirsi Ali,Geert Wilders,Dutch-Moroccan Muslim,Submission,Alan Jones,Janet Levy

FU*KI*G Terrorist !!!! oops woowww,sorry what was he thinking? how about Muslim “car enthusiast” (that’s better), bailed for Easter riot, cameraman stood down.

 

This Thug Omar, and his Father have been shamed by their OWN actions, nobody else’s.Why act,with even the slightest amount of dignity, when you can behave like a Muslim ? Over the top reactions, to every slight,perceived or real. Thank God they are members of the “Religion of Peace” who knows how they would behave if they were members of the “Religion of Bloodthirsty Rioting Hoodlums Head hunters and Terrorists” we would really be in trouble then.

Alleged ringleaders of Bob Jane riot bailed despite fears of repeat

Norrie Ross
Herald Sun
April 01, 2010

TWO alleged ringleaders of the Bob Jane T-Marts riot at Oakleigh have been granted bail today, despite fears of a repeat of the mayhem over the Easter weekend.

Magistrate Fiona Stewart released Aziz Elbayeh, 19, of Springvale, and Omar Amr, 19, of Springvale South but set strict reporting restrictions and a curfew for the pair.

Ms Stewart said Mr Elbayeh and Mr Amr had shown cause why they should be granted bail but warned them they should steer clear of any "car culture'' gatherings or social networks.

Prosecutor Catherine Sedgwick, who had opposed bail, revealed today that a warrant was issued for Amr's arrest last week when he failed to appear in court on other matters.

For this reason, she said the prosecution believed he was a flight risk.

At an earlier hearing, Constable Greer Goldsmith told the court police had evidence of further riots being planned this weekend on Facebook and car enthusiast websites.

Both men face charges of riot, incitement to riot, affray, burglary, theft and criminal damage arising out of the riot over the cancellation of an Easternats car race.

Mr Elbayeh is accused of smashing a chair through the window of the T-Mart store while Mr Amr allegedly threw a lit flare at a policeman.

During the the riot, 100 police faced off against 2000 protesters.

Ms Stewart ordered that the teenagers cannot leave the house between 9pm and 6am without being accompanied by a parent and that they not use the internet or mobile phones in relation to the so-called "car culture'' network in Melbourne.

Additional conditions that Amr should surrender his passport and not attend an international point of departure were also imposed.

"If you are found guilty you have significantly let your decent families down,'' she told the pair.

Police raided the homes of Mr Elbayeh and Mr Amr on Tuesday night, seizing mobile phones and laptops.

They were allegedly identified on CCTV at the scene of mayhem.

UPDATE The Cameraman has been sacked. 

Technorati Tags: Aziz Elbayeh,Omar Amr,Bob Jane T Marts Oakleigh,Car Culture,Religion of Peace,Muslim Car Enthusiasts,Melbourne's Muslim Rage Boys

Sydney's Occupied Territories,Michael Darwiche,Muslim Criminal's brother arrested and denied bail

Michael (?) Darwiche
Arrested and denied bail.

Muslim Criminals supporters " They will never break us"

Darwiche denied 'vengeance', and bail

The Daily Telegraph
March 20, 2009 05:30pm

A SYDNEY man accused of planning to avenge the shooting murder of his brother has been denied bail, despite pleading for release to help care for his dead sibling's children.

Michael Darwiche, 40, sat quietly in the dock of Bankstown Local Court on Friday as his barrister argued for bail on eight firearms charges.

Darwiche is the brother of Abdul Darwiche, shot dead in a hail of bullets in front of his children near a Sydney service station last Saturday.

Since the killing, there has been speculation a long-standing gang feud between the Darwiches and the rival Razzak and Fahda families would be reignited.

Darwiche was arrested about 9pm (AEDT) on Thursday at Bankstown.

"At 9pm yesterday the defendant was the passenger in the front seat of a motor vehicle driving along Salvia Avenue in Bankstown,'' barrister Michael Coroneos told the court.

The blue BMW was subsequently searched by police, with Darwiche claiming he and the driver, Michael Darwick (Michael Darwick), were on their way to a McDonald's restaurant.

However, underneath the rear passenger seat of the BMW, police allegedly found a Glock 23 pistol and an amount of ammunition, a street directory, and the names and addresses of the Fahda family.

"There is nothing to suggest that he (Michael Darwiche) had knowledge of the existence of the firearm when he got in the front passenger seat,'' Mr Coroneos said.

He insisted the police case relied wholly on speculation.

"There is nothing that can be placed before this court that this person has done anything to ... present a danger to the community,'' he added.

Mr Coroneos argued his client, a director of a construction company, should be granted bail to continue his business and financially support his wife and five children, as well as the children of his murdered brother.

Sergeant Wayne Druery admitted much of the evidence was speculative but asked Magistrate Paul Falzon to consider the protection of the community and refuse bail.

"This defendant comes before you not on one matter in which there is no presumption in favour of bail, but two,'' Sgt Druery said to Mr Falzon.

"It is true that we are still waiting on scientific evidence, but we say at this stage that there is strong circumstantial evidence.''

Mr Falzon noted Darwiche's strong community ties and willingness to provide surety in excess of $800,000 and surrender his passport, but denied bail.

Darwiche is due to face Sydney Central Local Court on May 14 by audio visual link.

He and his co-accused face eight charges, including unlicensed possession of an unregistered firearm and being armed with intent to commit an indictable offence.

Darwiche, 36, did not apply for bail and is due before Sydney's Central Local Court next Friday.

Sydney's Occupied Territories erupt in Murder and Assault Police, as Islams Finest do their THAANG