Serial offender who assaulted police given good-behaviour bond and community work order

LEIGH VAN DEN BROEKE
The Daily Telegraph
November 28 2015

All this Pious Muslim Savage has to do between now and the next time he caves in a NSW Police officers face is to do is prey at his local Mosque and have his Imam say he folded  envelopes for taxpayer funded Multicultural / Harmony Day community out reach  projects and he will AGAIN walk free. What better Mad Dog to let loose on Judeo Christian Western Democracy than the Rabid Mad Dog of Islam ?protected by the Progressive Lefts laws of Racial Discrimination and all cultures behaviours are EQUAL.

No wonder the Muslim SAVAGE is laughing, I would still be in Jail if I hit a Copper ONCE (AND RIGHTLY SO) 

Sydney's Occupied Territories are now ruled by Muslim Courts, the Labor Green Loons would say that that is ok how about Australians and THEIR Police Force members?

No rumblings from the NSW Police Association ... oh thats right their job is to collect Union Fees to fund the Islam friendly Labor Green Loons.

-------------------------

WITH a broad smile and casual wave, this serial police assaulter avoided jail for a third time when he faced Parramatta Local Court.

Abdulrahman Mohamed Atteya was given an Intensive Correction Order and good behaviour bond after being found guilty of attacking his fiancee and punching a police officer at his Granville home in October 2014.

The 22-year-old gave Constable Joel Swales a black eye as the officer tried to handcuff him in a clash with his family and police.

According to court documents, officers were investigating a domestic violence report in which Atteya attacked his former fiancee.

He slammed her against a brick wall and repeatedly hit her before grabbing her throat and squeezing while saying “I’m going to kill you” until a passer-by intervened, court documents said.

At the time of his arrest, Atteya was on a two-year suspended sentence for attacking police and resisting arrest in September 2013.

He was also facing two charges of assaulting police on December 20, 2013 and was put on a further 18-month suspended sentence.

Atteya had been found guilty of common assault, resisting an officer in the execution of duty and assaulting a police officer in execution of duty.

“The whole incident once the police arrived … was absolutely deplorable.”

His defence lawyer argued that Atteya had not offended since the 2014 incident.

“I would urge your honour to give him his last reprieve,” the lawyer said.

“All the progress he has made would be lost (if he were to go to jail).”

Magistrate Shane McAnulty said the attack was “particularly violent”.

“The whole incident once the police arrived … was absolutely deplorable,” he said.

Mr McAnulty sentenced Atteya to a two-year good behaviour bond and an Intensive Correction Order for 20 months in which he will perform 32 hours of community service a week. He will also have to submit to alcohol and drug tests.

A police spokeswoman said they were “looking at that ruling”.

Deputy Premier and Police Minister Troy Grant said he was disappointed anyone would show such disrespect to police officers.

“The NSW Government is looking at ways to increase social cohesion but we also need to bring back a strong onus on individual responsibility,” Mr Grant said.

Australia: Labor Green Loons refuse to accept what they demand others suffer

The Greens stupendous rejection of their own policy should be a warning to all those who blithely support these buffoons.

Piers Akerman
Daily Telegraph
November 272015

GRASSROOTS GREENS A GAGGLE OF GEESE

THE complete and utter hypocritical lunacy of inner-urban Greens was demonstrated outstandingly this week by Leichhardt Council’s four Greens councillors, who voted against plans to house refugees in unused buildings on the Callan Park site — formerly a home for the mentally ill.

Despite the high-profile publicity-seeking leadership of Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young and her coterie of proponents of an open border Australia, the Leichhardt Greens denied themselves an opportunity to show their convictions were more than #hashtags and self-aggrandising tweets.

Their print media backer, The Sydney Morning Herald, in an opinionated story masquerading as news, attempted to blame local government politicking and “right-wing anti-Islamic extremists” for the local Greens’ failure to stand by their federal colleagues’ commitment to house refugees in the empty Callan Park buildings.

Nope. It was just the Greens displaying their usual stupidity.

The Rozelle site has been begging for occupation and, in the heart of the Green-Left belt, what better place to house the refugees the compassionistas have been bellyaching about? Certainly Leichhardt Labor councillor Simon Emsley thought the council could do worse, and called on the council to approach the state and federal governments to create a “permanent refugee welcome centre: on the site of the former mental hospital at Callan Park, and create temporary accommodation to increase the Syrian refugee intake in the inner west.

But his charitable thought went nowhere when all four Leichhardt Council Greens representatives — Rochelle Porteous, Craig Channells, Daniel Kogoy and Michele McKenzie — voted against the proposal.

Displaying extraordinary naivety, Emsley told The Daily Telegraph he was shocked the Greens voted against the plan: “Given the committed advocacy role played by prominent national leaders of The Greens party I had assumed local Greens councillors would have thrown their full support behind the idea of the inner west playing a practical role to support refugee settlement.”

The Greens claim they might have supported the motion if it also contained amendments that included writing to Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Opposition Leader Bill Shorten “calling for an end to mandatory detention, all asylum seekers to be processed onshore and be permitted to stay in the community on bridging visas with the right to work while their refugee status is determined.”

The claim is pretty hollow. Another motion put up by independent councillor John Stamolis including these amendments was also opposed by the Greens. The Greens stupendous rejection of their own policy should be a warning to all those who blithely support these buffoons.

Another Labor Hizb ut-Tahrir Green Loon Multicultural Harmony Day Down Under.

Australia's New Leftist Progressive PM Malcolm of Lakemba, has obviously not given his new best friends enough of what they demand of Australia.. why else would they start killing us again?

Real victims forgotten in Parramatta shooting as left moves to protect muslims

October 5, 2015 12:00am

TIM BLAIRThe Daily Telegraph

Parramatta shooting shows Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull wrong about being sensitive with terrorism

Andrew Bolt
The Daily Telegraph
October 5 2015.

"Who dares speak frankly about any of this, when our new Prime Minister implies what’s really inflammatory is not Islam but Australia?"

LAST Friday morning, just before Curtis Cheng was murdered, Malcolm Turnbull revealed he would be more sensitive in tackling terrorism.

Gone would be “the blunt and often divisive language used by his predecessor Tony Abbott”, The Australian reported, clearly briefed by our new Prime Minister or his team.

Abbott’s rude talk had just “alienated many in the ­Islamic community”, and “Mr Turnbull will adopt a new, more inclusive tone”.

This was just what the media Left had claimed to want when it was looking for excuses to kick Abbott.

How those journalists had savaged Abbott for what they gleefully claimed was his politically motivated scaremongering about terrorism and his “inflammatory” and “divisive” language — language that actually seemed plain common sense.

How dare he alienate Muslims by asking them “to be part of ‘Team Australia’’.
How dare he suggest Muslim leaders did not condemn Islamist terrorism strongly enough, even saying that although Western leaders called Islam a religion of peace, “I wish more Muslim leaders would say that more often and mean it”?

And how crass to keep referring to the head-hacking Islamic State death cult as, er, a death cult?

See, phrases like “death cult” just upset Muslims, protested journalists and Labor.

And Turnbull whispered that, too, as he privately white-anted Abbott.

Sometimes Turnbull didn’t just whisper it, either. In July he shouted it in a speech, warning that unnamed people “over-estimate” the jihadist threat.

“It’s easy to sensationalise these scoundrels, these criminals, and we need … to be careful that we are not amplifying their own work, their significance,” he said loftily.

But he wasn’t talking about Abbott, he protested.

But he was, of course, which Friday’s news story now proves.

Well, let’s go back to that Friday. That afternoon, ­15-year-old Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar went to his Parramatta mosque.

We’re not sure what he did there, or whom he saw. Nor do we know how this Iraqi Kurd from Iran got his hands on a gun.

But Farhad then walked to the Parramatta police station, slipped behind Curtis Cheng, who worked in the station’s finance department, and shot him in the head.

He repeatedly shouted “Allah” until he was in turn shot dead by police. NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said Farhad’s attack seemed politically motivated, and thus terrorism.

Little had Turnbull known how soon he’d get to demonstrate his new “inclusive” rhetoric. But on Saturday we heard it. Turnbull, reading from prepared notes, insisted “the Australian Muslim community will be especially appalled and shocked” by the act of terrorism.

“We must not vilify or blame the entire Muslim community with the actions of what is, in truth, a very, very small percentage of violent extremist individuals.”



And, true, most Muslims would hate what was done. They must not be vilified or treated as enemies. Yet Turnbull is still wrong. Very wrong.

First, he was wrong to have scapegoated Abbott, and imply Abbott was partly responsible for driving Muslim youths to extremism.

The threat from Islamist terrorism here is little different to the threat faced by almost every Western country, whether their leaders talk as sweetly as the French President or as tough as the Israeli Prime Minister.

In other words, the problem lies not in “us” or our politicians, but in Islam itself — in its sacred texts that preach intolerance and condone ­violence against unbelievers.

In fact, I doubt that 15-year-old Farhad even knew whether Turnbull or Abbott was now Prime Minister, or would have cared.

Second, Turnbull is wrong because the proportion of violent extremist individuals in our Muslim community is not “very, very small”. In fact, for the size of the community here — fewer than 500,000 — it is dangerously high.

 "Small minority of Muslims" Yeah Right.

All 21 Australians jailed for terrorism in Australia are Muslim, even though we have almost as many Buddhists. More than 200 Australian Muslims have joined the Islamic State, and hundreds more have been stopped at the airport. More hundreds here support the jihadists, and still more condone them.

Those numbers suggest the third and fundamental reason Turnbull is wrong.

He is wrong to attack ­Abbott because that just encourages the almost pathological blame-shifting of so many Muslim leaders and representatives. So many just blame Australia and the West for the violent extremism that curiously comes almost exclusively from their community.

On the ABC’s Q&A we’ve heard from a dozen at least, claiming Muslims are the real victims and accusing our governments and police and anti-Muslim conspiracies.

Muslim academic Randa Abdel-Fattah, for instance, said: “I’m very cynical about the government’s use of these (anti-terrorist) raids to politicise the Muslim problem of terrorism.”

Muslim journalist Mona Eltahawy said: “None of you do absolutely anything to help us. You’ve always sold us­­­ out.”

NY Subway Vandal, Mona's finest Hour

And Muslim Legal Network solicitor Lydia Shelley added: “Please don’t use the Muslim people, don’t use the issue of radicalisation, to really sell these (anti-terrorism) laws, which is really about a sustained attack on civil liberties in this country.”

Stronger stuff is preached in the more radical mosques and meeting halls. Hizb ut Tahrir spokesman Wassim Doureihi, for one, was filmed shouting to followers: “Even if a thousand bombs went off in this country, all that it will prove is that the Muslims are angry, and they have every reason to be angry.”

Even the Grand Mufti, Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohammed, blamed Abbott’s support for Israel for causing young Muslims to sign up for the Islamic State, rather than blame Islam itself for inspiring such slaughter.

And this kind of moral evasion is what Turnbull has encouraged by scapegoating Abbott. He has taken the pressure off Muslim leaders to reform their faith.

He has taken the pressure off us to seriously debate whether Islam — as interpreted by many — actually fits into a multi-religious secular democracy.

And he’s made it harder to have the honest debate we need about whether to accept more Muslim refugees.

Consider:

Man Monis, an Iranian “refugee” and Islamist, staged the deadly Lindt cafe­ siege;

Numan Haider, an Afghan “refugee” and Islamic State recruit, stabbed two police in Melbourne;

Mohammad Ali Baryalei, an Afghan “refugee”, became a recruiter and fighter for the Islamic State;

Saney Edow Aweys, a Somalian “refugee”, plotted to attack the Holsworthy Army base.

So should we accept more Muslim refugees, or take in Christians instead? Would Christian refugees be less likely to hate us, and more likely to thrive?

But here again, Turnbull may have weakened the “divisive” Abbott policy.

Muslim leaders say the government’s Refugee Resettlement Advisory Council last week told them the 12,000 Syrian and Iraqi refugees we’re taking won’t be selected by religion, as Abbott hints, but by need.

True, Turnbull privately knows Christians are the most persecuted minority, so should still qualify first. But who now knows?

And which mainstream politician now dares say so?

Who dares speak frankly about any of this, when our new Prime Minister implies what’s really inflammatory is not Islam but Australia?

Labor Green Loons Favourite Killers control Australia's Beaches

Sharks: Dawn of new era as traditional safety warnings are outdated

Geoff Chambers
The Daily Telegraph
September 14, 2015

SURFERS are being put in deadly danger because shark safety messages peddled by government agencies do not apply to white pointers and can’t be easily accessed online.

The Daily Telegraph can reveal traditional safety messages about swimming at dusk and dawn and staying close to the beach are outdated.

North coast shark victims Paul Wilcox and Tadashi ­Nakahara were both attacked and killed by great whites near the beach in good conditions between 10am and 11am.

Ballina bodyboarder Matt Lee was lucky to survive after being attacked midmorning in similar conditions off Lighthouse Beach in July.

In stark contrast to the NSW Department of Primary Industries website, which has no mention of sharks on its home page and requires links to find its so-called “Sharksmart” information, the WA 

government has a dedicated shark site, also called Sharksmart.

The WA page provides real-time updates on tagged shark locations, and photos of shark species instead of illustrations.

It also provides clear ­information on emergency response details and a fact/fiction checklist, which presents uncensored information on the threat posed by some shark species.

BALLINA ATTACK VICTIM WELCOMED HOME

SYDNEY PREPARES FOR SHARK SUMMER

 One of the country’s most senior shark experts told The Daily Telegraph traditional safety protocols did not apply to white pointers. And while bull sharks were known to be near river mouths and to attack 

humans, the ­behaviour of bronze whalers and tiger sharks could vary.

“It is impossible to predict. And every shark behaves differently and every coastline is different,” the expert said.

Matilda Hughes, part-owner of Avoca and Terrigal Learn to Surf, told The Daily Telegraph her business was hurt following a local attack last year.

The 20-year-old said accurate and updated shark education tips were crucial for both locals and tourists.

The DPI said it was looking at improving the NSW Sharksmart program and agreed it was an “important tool to protect beachgoers”.

SHARK ATTACK VICTIM LUCKY AFTER ‘FANNING MOMENT’


WATCH THE AMAZING MICK FANNING SHARK ATTACK VIDEO

Australia : "They share a stunning lack of humility. What unites them is their opinion that other Australians, “out there” in the suburbs, are selfish, parochial, gullible, redneck morons, easily led by evil Right Wing NutJobs (RWNJ)."

Miranda Devine: Turn Left to take the road to damnation

Miranda Devine
The Sunday Telegraph

September 13, 2015 

IT is in the egalitarian nature of Australia that we have neglected to cultivate a class of genuine elites. Unfortunately, this vacuum at the top means that a bunch of chattering mediocrities have appointed themselves to the role of our moral and intellectual betters.

Some even have acquired posh accents and a haughty tone to give the impression of superiority.

They share a stunning lack of humility. What unites them is their opinion that other Australians, “out there” in the suburbs, are selfish, parochial, gullible, redneck morons, easily led by evil Right Wing NutJobs (RWNJ).
Our faux elites claim they are driven by altruism, at least when it comes to issues that don’t adversely affect them, like refugee, drug and climate policies.

They don’t live in suburbs affected by drug crime, and can afford to pay for rehab for their wayward offspring.

They don’t have to fish dead bodies out of the ocean or face the consequences of their demand for open borders.

They don’t compete for welfare resources or family reunion quotas with asylum seekers or live near areas of social friction.

They barely notice the soaring energy costs that arise from climate policies they push for reasons of guilt, moral vanity, and in-crowd identity.

Their compassion is employed only in those circumstances where it showcases their status and their membership of a virtuous elite.

Thus, the tragedy of Syria’s civil war only merited their tears after that photograph of a drowned Syrian toddler became a media focal point.

What followed was an unseemly contest to trumpet their sad feelings.

To any reasonable observer, these people are irrational and ridiculous, bordering on downright dangerous.

Their self regard is so extreme that it verges into mass delusion.

Or, to apply a more precise diagnosis, they suffer from an affliction know as “pathological altruism”.

This is the inspired coinage of American systems engineer Barbara Oakley.

In a 2013 paper for the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, she defined it as “behaviour in which attempts to promote the welfare of … others results, instead, in harm that … was reasonably foreseeable.”

So, for instance, if you accidentally break a vase while helping a friend move house, that is not pathological altruism because the bad outcome was not foreseeable.

But if your brother is going through drug withdrawal and you get him more drugs to make him feel better, you are just “enabling his addiction. In this case, your well-meaning altruism is pathological.

Oakley cites examples such as “the overly attentive ‘helicopter’ father who threatens to sue instructors who give well-deserved bad grades, or the mother who attempts to protect her son by refusing to vaccinate him and who consequently fuels a loss of herd immunity underpinning a local whooping cough epidemic in which an infant dies”.

Closer to home, examples abound: drug liberalisers, who wants ice decriminalised might be motivated by a desire to help drug addicts.

But their remedies only exacerbate the harms and increase the numbers of addicts.

Similarly, well-meaning lefties, who talked Kevin Rudd into dismantling Howard-era border protections caused harm to those people they lured across the ocean, to those refugees whose places were taken, and damaged public confidence in our high level of migration. In other words, what might feel altruistic can end up making the situation worse.

“Altruistic intentions must be run through the sieve of rational analysis; all too often, the best long-term action to help others … is not intuitively obvious, not what temporarily makes us feel good, and not what is being promoted by other individuals, with their own self-serving interests,” Oakley says.

Elevating rational analysis over emotion is what the Prime Minister did last week when considering Australia’s response to the Syrian crisis: “It’s important that we act with our head as well as with our heart here.

“While I think we are all in the grip of grief, really, as we saw the tragedy unfolding on our television screens, the responsibility of government ... is to act in a measured and considered way.”

But for taking time to consider, he was criticised.

In our emotionally incontinent culture, driven by the sentimental narcissism of social media, true altruism can seem cruel.

Oakley cites examples of saying “no” to the student who demands a higher grade or to the addict who needs another hit.

“The social consequences of appearing cruel in a culture that places high value on kindness, empathy, and altruism can lead us to misplaced ‘helpful’ behaviour and result in self-deception regarding the consequences of our actions.”

Thus our faux elites damned the Abbott government as cruel when it went about rescuing our immigration system from criminal people smugglers.

They refuse to acknowledge that only because we “stopped the boats” is it possible to offer 12,000 Syrians a new home.

Similarly, they slam the government for skewing the intake towards persecuted minorities, particularly Christians against whom a religious genocide is being waged in the Middle East.

In order to showcase their tolerance they falsely claim helping the most needy is ­Islamophobic.

No, the altruism flaunted by our phony elites isn’t really about helping refugees or drug addicts or saving the planet.

It’s all about burnishing their reputations.

The road to hell is paved with their good intentions.

Andrew Bolt Australia's ONLY Conservative Political TV Commentator and his guests discuss the past week in Australian Politics.

Australian Anti Terror Operation cancelled after Islamic Caliphate supporters riot in Melbourne

Australian PM Tony Abbott has to stand up to these insurgents, illegal aliens, illegal entrants and their Leftist Labor Green Loon facilitators and supporters.

PM Abbott must immediately order that the protection of Australia and it citizens from those who say they are sworn by Religious and                                    ideological obligations to destroy us no longer dictate Australia's                                        border security.

Mark Latham offends the professional "Offenderati" and pays the price.

Mark Latham’s foul tirade shocks audience at Melbourne Writers’ Festival 2015

TOM MINEAR
SUNDAY HERALD SUN 
August 22 2015

ONE-TIME prime ministerial aspirant Mark Latham has launched a bizarre tirade of abuse against almost everyone.

Audience members booed, jeered and some even stormed out of the Melbourne Writers Festival Q&A with ABC host Jonathan Green, who could not control Mr Latham’s ranting.
                                              _________________________

"Mr Latham’s ranting."  That's leftist code talk for someone saying something that the Marxist's do not want to hear aka they are "Offended"
that Latham did not firstly tell them how marvellously clever,wise and morally superior THEY are than the average Australian before he told them to all get Fucked and Piss Off had Latham had of done that he would have lauded as a sapling spawned of the Lest's new                                      "Tree of Knowledge"

                                            -----------------------------------------

Mr Latham abused and then ignored Green, berating him for a comment he had shared on Twitter.

“You are a bigot ... You’re a deviant, you’re a hypocrite,” Latham said.

“There’s no way I’m answering your questions in such a forum ... I decide on which format and the manner in which it comes to this country.”

Audience members then grilled Mr Latham, asking about the abusive @RealMarkLatham Twitter account.

He refused to confirm whether he was behind it, suggesting he had a commercial arrangement to be interviewed about the issue.

Asked about his repeated slurs against high-profile women, including Australian of the Year Rosie Batty, Mr Latham was unrepentant and criticised the “left feminist clique”.

He nearly cried as he lashed out at Ms Batty for calling him a misogynist, saying he was a stay-at-home dad and supportive husband.

“If you’re going to suggest to me that’s fair comment, you’ve got a very warped view of fairness,” Latham claimed.

Mr Latham’s slurs against top transgender military official Cate McGregor — who he called “the then Malcolm McGregor” — prompted boos and cannot be published for legal reasons.

Green piped in to say that “I think you need to think about this, whether this is wise” but Mr Latham kept talking.

Actor Max Gillies was in the audience and told Mr Latham that he didn’t come to “listen to an afternoon of abuse”.

_______________________________

"Actor" Max Gillies, (c) seen above surrounded by typical faces that belong to those who attend the Melbourne Writers Festival.

     ___________________________________

Mr Latham replied: “Piss off, leave, go, go. It’s a democracy ... Get your lard ass off the seat and go.”

Before he bizarrely offered parenting advice, Mr Latham delivered an unprompted string of swear words.

Mr Latham, who resigned from the Australian Financial Review earlier this week, said the week had been “wonderfully hilarious” and “the theatre of the absurd we call Australian politics”.

He proudly claimed he never made a mistake in his columns and lashed out at “privileged elites” who were “trying to set me up for a fall” and had campaigned for his sacking.

“I stand by my opinions as having a role to play in the public debate and in the future, so they shall,” Mr Latham said.

“I will be charged back into battle. Today is just a prelude, a warm-up.”

So what did he say ?
Listen for yourself WARNING contains AUSTRALIAN language and a few swear words, if you are a Trade Unionist,an "Actor" a Writer or a member of Australia's self described intelligentsia, GetUp, Labor Party Green Loon supporter / activist and or have never been gainfully employed "Jazz Hands" and " Trigger" warnings are
                                 
                  NOT included in following video watch / listen to at your own  risk.                                            

Despite his hour-long tirade, Mr Latham complained about the “terrible corrosion of free speech”.
He provided virtually no political commentary except to say that no voters in key seats gave “two hoots” about issues like gay marriage.

Melbourne Writers Festival organisers tweeted they were “disappointed” with Mr Latham and it was “not the respectful conversation we value”.

Green simply tweeted: “Well that escalated quickly”.

Mr Latham refused to speak to the Sunday Herald Sun after the session.

Why is Islam the only Religion permitted to TAX the Australian shopper ?

Halal certification in Australia is big business and worth 
millions to certifiers

"YOU may not have noticed it — the halal certification mark that sits on almost every item in an Aussie shopping basket from Vegemite and Cadbury chocolate to Steggles chicken breast tenders.But it is there and manufacturers, wholesalers and food processors have paid a slew of unregulated certifiers millions of dollars to put it there.It’s all about money."

 MATTHEW BENNSThe Daily TelegraphAugust 15, 2015  

          FULL ARTICLE 
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why is this TAX on Australian food not shown on all receipts like the Goods and Services Tax (GST)  is rightly required to be ?

What part of the Australian Taxation Act permits this TAX been imposed upon Australians by this Religious Organisation?

Will the Islamic Religion be the only organisation authorised to levy TAXES on Australia's food products and indeed other non food items, if not why not?

Why is the RSPCA Silent on this barbaric cruel slaughter of animals?

I will start returning OPENED products that I have unknowingly purchased that I have been forced to pay the Islamic TAX on any product that bears the Islamic Halal TAX certification sticker.

The Manifestations of this belief system, Islam, have, according to those who flee it in the millions every year for safety and a better life in the " land of the Great Satan" the USA and other Judeo Christian Western Democracies,are so vile, that according to these "refugees" from Islam, are not able to provide even a most basic quality of life that is to be reasonably expected in the 21st Century.

Could someone tell me why, once these same people are given sanctuary and safe haven from the manifestations of their Religious beliefs,these same people demand that their host country adopt the same failed practices they say they had no choice but to flee ?

Where will these Muslims run away too after they have done to OUR  Country what they did to their various nations of birth ? 

The only Logical conclusion that can be arrived at if we are to believe those who say they fled their various Islamic nations of birth because life was so intolerable under the manifestations of Islam is that they are colonising the west because it is their intention to do to the west what they did to the nations they say they were forced to flee, If not why then do they demand that their Western Judeo Christian Democracy host nations that gave them shelter adopt the very legal, social and religious practices that they say those same practices failed them and indeed the Nations that were ruled by them.

Australian's hard earned WAGES at Work, every time you buy a Halal Certified product from the freezer or Butcher this is the Islamic Religions version of Holy Slaughter.

Humans, Male,Female,Adult and Child  are slaughtered in the same way but without the 'high tech " restraining devices (as seen in the video below) by Pious Muslims when they no longer have any use for infidels (Non Muslims), or Muslims no longer useful or deemed to be not savage enough to satisfy the demands of allah as recorded by Islams "Perfect Man" Mohammed in what Muslims insist on calling the "Holy Koran" 

Halal Choices is an excellent website that explains how your hard earned dollars are legally appropriated by the Islamic "Religion" to further the objectives of "Only True Religion" Islam.

"Support Call: Mohamed El-Mouelhy vs Q Society, Kirralie Smith et al
Help Q Society defend freedom of expression in Australia by donating towards the legal cost of our defence against claims of defamation by Mohamed El-Mouelhy, the director of the private company ‘Halal Certification Authority Pty Ltd’ in the NSW Supreme Court.
Read the letter of our president Debbie Robinson for more details.

It is vital that those who speak the truth about Islamic halal certification and other Islamic impositions are not silenced by time-consuming and expensive court action."

It is difficult to know but I wonder how many lamb chops did Australian Supermarkets sell that were loaded up with the Halal TAX did it take to finance say the two Bali Bombings, the WTC on 911, the Man Monis Lindt Cafe killer's activities since he arrived in Australia.

How much of these compulsory Muslim TAXES has been used will be used in the future to kill Australian Soldiers both in the middle east and on Australian soil,how much of this money is used to finance illegal drug importation and distribution in Australia and around the world.

                         

We will never know how many Australians have been Raped Bashed Stabbed Killed or blown into a thousand pieces financed by the Islamic Halal TAX that Australians are forced to pay by the 2.5% "Muslim Community" aka. Labor Green Loons VOTE People.

The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) GetUp financed Labor Green Loon  "Independent" Co Party does not think that there is enough Muslims in Australia and despite importing some 55,000 majority single undocumented Muslim males 18 to 28 into Australia during their Rudd (Lu Kewen) / Gillard / Rudd (Lu Kewen) six year reign of open borders they are PROMISING, that if re elected in 2016 the securing of Australia's borders will be an OPTION as opposed to the present Conservative Abbott Governments policy of Secure Borders been an OBLIGATION of the Australian Government.
  

Labor Green Loon foot soldiers

Craig Thomson 3 months in the slammer 9 months suspended

Australia:Labor Steve Price, Andrew Bolt, Ben Fordham,Michael Smith, Craig Thomson, Chris Mcardle, HSU

When will the Australian Labor Party and their financiers and fundraisers the ACTU apologise for their War Crimes against Australians during WW2?

ALP must apologise for union war crimes

Piers Akerman
The Sunday Telegraph
January 25,2014

AS a backdrop to today's Australia Day celebrations, the Labor/Green Left is working itself into a lather over plans to review the flawed national education curriculum.

The review is most timely and it behoves Australians to pause to remember that the awful campaign being waged by powerful trade unions during World War II had prevailed, it is unlikely we would have had anything to celebrate today.

Naturally, the current nat-ional curriculum crafted by Left-leaning academics says nothing about the appalling actions taken by individual ­unions, their leaders, the ACTU and members of Labor's leadership to sabotage Australia's war effort.

In a hard-hitting Australia Day eve address to members of the Young Liberals, Employment Minister Eric Abetz, the leader of the government in the Senate, reminded his audience of this extraordinary chapter in Australian history - a chapter which Labor cannot bring itself to address.

Fittingly, Senator Abetz was speaking in the port city of Fremantle, the scene of a number of the unconscionable actions taken to undermine the war against Axis nations.

Just as former Prime Minister Paul Keating has attempted to rewrite history with his ­recent fallacious account of Australia's engagement in World War I, so too, have Labor historians attempted to airbrush from our history the efforts of the trade union movement and the ALP to ­incapacitate Australian forces during World War II.

Fortunately, West Australian scholar, poet and author Hal Colebatch has published a painstakingly researched, fully documented account of the treachery in a book Australia's Secret War. Quoting from the book, Senator Abetz said: "(a) systematic campaign of sabotage criss-crossed the nation, from Townsville to Fremantle, and cost the lives of countless Australian Diggers and allied soldiers."

My late uncle (Z Forces) witnessed supplies and planes and weapons deliberately dumped into the water at Townsville by ACTU members during WW2.

The actions of the trade unionists involved included deliberately damaging planes, removing valves from radio transmitters that made them inoperative, which in turn led to an inability to provide safe direction to a squadron of US planes and their crewmen, all of whom were lost.

Coalminers and munition factory workers went on strike, prejudicing the war effort, costing lives, all leading to unnecessary loss and increasing the length and cost of the war.

Senator Abetz continued: "Australian women were needlessly widowed. Australian children were needlessly left fatherless."

He said the deliberate acts of union bastardry which led to people being killed and injured, and the war effort being severely compromised, were acts of murder, grievous bodily harm and treason, all of which can be sheeted home to the union movement and all of which have been largely ­ignored. He believes the unions involved, their successors and the ACTU should provide a national apology for prejudicing the nation's war effort, ­remembering those families who needlessly lost loved ones because of their members' treasonous activities.

This ugly period in Labor's history came perilously close to the surface when the Howard government took on the Maritime Union and demonstrated how specious its arguments on loading rates were.

Now the MUA and the Electrical Trade Union have donated to a war chest set up to defend bikie gang members caught up by Queensland Premier Campbell Newman's tough new anti-organised crime laws.

According to reports, the MUA has donated $5000 and the ETU has tossed in $10,000, peanuts to these multimillion dollar operations, but no doubt welcomed by the bikies. Since 2000, the MUA and ETU contributed $1 million and $3.5 million respectively to the ALP.

Senator Abetz said then that unions engaging or financially assisting bikie gangs would be judged on such linkages and that the Labor party needed to disassociate itself from these unions.

"Mr Shorten must refuse to accept any further donations from any affiliated union that is also providing support to bikie gangs. Anything less would be a complete abandonment of leadership by him," Senator Abetz said. "Individual union members are fed up with union bosses unilaterally spending their hard-earned money in more-than-questionable ­causes, be it at the Health Services Union, the CFMEU, the MUA or the ETU."

It would seem that while the Labor movement is losing its attempt to keep its foul wartime record a dark secret, it is unable to keep the lid on the activities of its current backers.

As a former national union leader, Bill Shorten has to clearly distance Labor from the shameful actions of the past and the discreditable activities of more recent members.

He should also deliver the long overdue national apology, well in time for next year's Australia Day celebration.