When I first saw this headline : American Flag unfurled at Pentagon
My first reaction was has there been a coup d'état at the White House ?
Has the Muslim in Chief been deposed by the American People, Military, Patriots?
Alas it not be so.
An American, Australian ,Israeli, British "Judeo Christian Friendly " blog.
Anthropogenic Global Warming SCAM
Showing posts with label 911. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 911. Show all posts
Friday, September 11, 2015
American Flag unfurled at Pentagon Has there been a coup d'état at the White House ?
When I first saw this headline : American Flag unfurled at Pentagon
My first reaction was has there been a coup d'état at the White House ?
Has the Muslim in Chief been deposed by the American People, Military, Patriots?
Alas it not be so.
September Eleven 2015 : Islam still Means Peace.... or whatever they and their Progressive Left cheer squad and Media apologists want it to mean...........
Since September 11 2001 there have been another 26,855 Koran induced Terror attacks perpetrated by members of the Islamic Religion of Peace
There is a reason we call it Islamic terrorism, and it isn't
because we falsely attribute motives to the terrorists, but
because Islam is the stated purpose and aim of the terrorists.
Daniel Greenfield
September Eleven 2015 and according to Muslims and the Progressive Left apologists facilitators and media cheer squads Islam still Means Peace....in
India and the Sudan and Algeria and New York and Pakistan and Israel and Russia and Chechnya and the Philippines and Indonesia and Nigeria and England and Thailand and Spain and Egypt and Bangladesh
and Saudi Arabia and Turkey and Morocco and Yemen and France and Uzbekistan and Gaza and Tunisia and Kosovo and Bosnia and Mauritania and Kenya and Eritrea and Syria and Somalia and Kuwait and
Ethiopia and Jordan and United Arab Emirates and Tanzania and Belgium and Denmark and East Timor and Qatar and Maryland and Tajikistan and the Netherlands and Afghanistan and Chad and Canada and
China and Nepal and the Maldives and Argentina and Mali and Angola and the Ukraine and Uganda and Germany and Lebanon and Iran and Kazakhstan and Sweden and Azerbaijan and Iraq and Scotland and
Macedonia and Bulgaria and Cameroon and Djibouti and Australia and...
...and pretty much wherever Islam is taken seriously:
"O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who
are near to you, and let them find harshness in you,
and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty"
Qur'an, Sura 9:123
Compiled from material sourced from The Religion of Peace
For an extensive coverage of events of September 11 2001 check out :
SEPTEMBER 11, 2015: 14TH anniversary of the Islamic terror attacks on America. We will never forget.
Friday, September 09, 2011
Rep. Allen West :"SACRIFICED SURVIVORS: The Untold Story of the Ground Zero Mega Mosque,"
REP. ALLEN WEST
West promotes film about controversial Ground Zero mosque
Rep. Allen West drew media attention when he hosted an event to promote a film critical of a the planned construction of a controversial mosque near the World Trade Center twin towers attacked on 9/11.
By Erika Bolstad
ebolstad@mcclatchydc.com
WASHINGTON -- U.S. Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., no stranger to controversy for his remarks about Muslim-Americans, on Wednesday renewed the debate over the Islamic center near Ground Zero in New York City, just days before the country marks the 10th anniversary of the terrorist attacks.
West, who sponsored the screening of a movie about the opposition to the Islamic center, said he hosted the event because he believes the center’s backers have a moral responsibility to honor the wishes of the families of the victims of the attacks who don’t want it near what will soon be a public memorial to those killed.
"If 10 years, or nine years after Pearl Harbor, if the country of Japan had come to the United States of America and said ‘we want to erect a memorial to Japanese naval seamanship at Pearl Harbor,’ what would we have said?" West said. "Decades from now, centuries from now, we much remember what happened on Sept. 11, 2001."
The film, "SACRIFICED SURVIVORS: The Untold Story of the Ground Zero Mega Mosque," was produced by Martin Mayer of the Christian Action Network, and shown in a conference room in the Rayburn House Office Building across from the Capitol.
The film’s producers bill their movie as a depiction of how "survivors and family members are experiencing yet another type of Islamic jihad."
Survivors, the filmmakers said, "believe they must work to keep people vigilant and fighting against the march of radical Islam," including efforts to build the center two blocks from Ground Zero.
West, whose district includes Broward and Palm Beach counties, was criticized by religious leaders in January for saying that Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the first Muslim member of Congress, "really does represent the antithesis of the principles upon which this country was established." West said at the time he was referring to Ellison’s support of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which has asked West to disassociate himself with some people the organization thinks are anti-Muslim.
At Wednesday’s press event, West was flanked by about a half-dozen relatives of people who died in the terrorist attacks.
Alice Hoagland, whose son Mark Bingham was among the 44 passengers on United Flight 93, said the developers should reconsider their plans. The proposed community center and place of worship, is in an old Burlington Coat Factory two blocks from where the World Trade Center stood when two hijacked planes crashed into the twin towers.
"This is not a legal question," Hogland said. "There is no question that anyone in the United States has the right to express his religious beliefs. There is no question that they have the legal right to build within two blocks of the site where 2,977 or so people died at the hands of Islamist terrorists. The question it seems to me is the moral right."
West again likened the attack to Pearl Harbor, and pointed out that 2011 is also the 70th anniversary of the Japanese attack that led the U.S. into World War II.
"We must never let events like Pearl Harbor or 9/11 go away," he said. "We must never forget the things that happened those two days, or the attack upon the United States of America. My fear is that maybe we could end up forgiving what happened on 9/11 because of certain things, this political correctness or this desire to be a multicultural America."
One man, Bruce DeCell, held up a photo of his son-in-law who was killed on 9/11, and said he wanted to tell people that "we are at war with the Islamic culture."
West didn’t disagree with him publically, but said later that he believes there needs to be "a recognition of some concepts, such as Sharia, that are the antithesis of what we believe in here in the United States of America," he said, referring to a system of Islamic law.
"I don’t think it’s a war on a culture," he said, "but I think we need to recognize some of the ideological differences that separate us, and if you want to get to a point of having peaceful coexistence, I think it’s where they need to reform some of these things."
Although billed as a press conference before the film’s screening, most of the people asking West questions were those tied to the movie or participants in a panel the filmmakers and other groups were organizing later in the day.
West didn’t disagree with those asking questions at the event, including one man who suggested that "Islam has a history of building victory monuments on places it has triumphed."
"Throughout the history of Islamic conquest, you do see the same type of parallels," West said, citing his recent trip to Israel and Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, a spot sacred to Muslims, Jews and Christians alike.
The debate over the Islamic center’s future in New York City has largely quieted since its height last summer. The project’s developers told the New York Times in August that they have hired a paid staff and begun raising money. They continue to hold prayers and events in the building, and its developers told the newspaper it could be as long as five years before they begin the sort of project first envisioned.
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/09/07/2395271/west-promotes-film-about-controversial.html#ixzz1XNMSf06w
Thanks to USA resident and Aussie News & Views subscriber Susan, for the above story.
West promotes film about controversial Ground Zero mosque
Rep. Allen West drew media attention when he hosted an event to promote a film critical of a the planned construction of a controversial mosque near the World Trade Center twin towers attacked on 9/11.
By Erika Bolstad
ebolstad@mcclatchydc.com
WASHINGTON -- U.S. Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., no stranger to controversy for his remarks about Muslim-Americans, on Wednesday renewed the debate over the Islamic center near Ground Zero in New York City, just days before the country marks the 10th anniversary of the terrorist attacks. West, who sponsored the screening of a movie about the opposition to the Islamic center, said he hosted the event because he believes the center’s backers have a moral responsibility to honor the wishes of the families of the victims of the attacks who don’t want it near what will soon be a public memorial to those killed.
"If 10 years, or nine years after Pearl Harbor, if the country of Japan had come to the United States of America and said ‘we want to erect a memorial to Japanese naval seamanship at Pearl Harbor,’ what would we have said?" West said. "Decades from now, centuries from now, we much remember what happened on Sept. 11, 2001."
The film, "SACRIFICED SURVIVORS: The Untold Story of the Ground Zero Mega Mosque," was produced by Martin Mayer of the Christian Action Network, and shown in a conference room in the Rayburn House Office Building across from the Capitol.
The film’s producers bill their movie as a depiction of how "survivors and family members are experiencing yet another type of Islamic jihad."
Survivors, the filmmakers said, "believe they must work to keep people vigilant and fighting against the march of radical Islam," including efforts to build the center two blocks from Ground Zero.
West, whose district includes Broward and Palm Beach counties, was criticized by religious leaders in January for saying that Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the first Muslim member of Congress, "really does represent the antithesis of the principles upon which this country was established." West said at the time he was referring to Ellison’s support of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which has asked West to disassociate himself with some people the organization thinks are anti-Muslim.
At Wednesday’s press event, West was flanked by about a half-dozen relatives of people who died in the terrorist attacks.
Alice Hoagland, whose son Mark Bingham was among the 44 passengers on United Flight 93, said the developers should reconsider their plans. The proposed community center and place of worship, is in an old Burlington Coat Factory two blocks from where the World Trade Center stood when two hijacked planes crashed into the twin towers.
"This is not a legal question," Hogland said. "There is no question that anyone in the United States has the right to express his religious beliefs. There is no question that they have the legal right to build within two blocks of the site where 2,977 or so people died at the hands of Islamist terrorists. The question it seems to me is the moral right."
West again likened the attack to Pearl Harbor, and pointed out that 2011 is also the 70th anniversary of the Japanese attack that led the U.S. into World War II.
"We must never let events like Pearl Harbor or 9/11 go away," he said. "We must never forget the things that happened those two days, or the attack upon the United States of America. My fear is that maybe we could end up forgiving what happened on 9/11 because of certain things, this political correctness or this desire to be a multicultural America."
One man, Bruce DeCell, held up a photo of his son-in-law who was killed on 9/11, and said he wanted to tell people that "we are at war with the Islamic culture."
West didn’t disagree with him publically, but said later that he believes there needs to be "a recognition of some concepts, such as Sharia, that are the antithesis of what we believe in here in the United States of America," he said, referring to a system of Islamic law.
"I don’t think it’s a war on a culture," he said, "but I think we need to recognize some of the ideological differences that separate us, and if you want to get to a point of having peaceful coexistence, I think it’s where they need to reform some of these things."
Although billed as a press conference before the film’s screening, most of the people asking West questions were those tied to the movie or participants in a panel the filmmakers and other groups were organizing later in the day.
West didn’t disagree with those asking questions at the event, including one man who suggested that "Islam has a history of building victory monuments on places it has triumphed."
"Throughout the history of Islamic conquest, you do see the same type of parallels," West said, citing his recent trip to Israel and Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, a spot sacred to Muslims, Jews and Christians alike.
The debate over the Islamic center’s future in New York City has largely quieted since its height last summer. The project’s developers told the New York Times in August that they have hired a paid staff and begun raising money. They continue to hold prayers and events in the building, and its developers told the newspaper it could be as long as five years before they begin the sort of project first envisioned.
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/09/07/2395271/west-promotes-film-about-controversial.html#ixzz1XNMSf06w
Sacrificed Survivors Trailer
How a Man answers a question from a Marine regarding the greatest threat to civilization since their former partner in crime Adolph Hitler was crushed
Technorati Tags: Sacrificed Survivors:The Untold Story of the Ground Zero Mega Mosque,Martin Mayer of the Christian Action Network,Ground Zero,Rep. Keith Ellison D-Minn.,U.S. Rep. Allen West,R-Fla.,Ground Zero in New York City,Pearl Harbor,Rayburn House Office Building,Broward and Palm Beach counties,Council on American-Islamic Relations,Alice Hoagland,Mark Bingham,United Flight 93,Burlington Coat Factory,World Trade Center,Islamist terrorists,Bruce DeCell,Sharia Law,9/11,Islamic Sociopaths Inc,Islamic Terrorists,Terrorism,Godless Savages,Mass Murderers
Monday, January 05, 2009
Rudd WILL listen to Obama's Gitmo pleas
We will listen to Obama's Gitmo pleas
Geoff Elliott and Patricia Karvelas
The Australian
January 05, 2009
THE Rudd Government would still be open to overtures from the incoming Obama administration to reconsider its refusal to take inmates from Guantanamo Bay.
After formally rebuffing for the second time the Bush administration on taking former terror suspects being held at Guantanamo, Acting Prime Minister Julia Gillard said Australia would consider subsequent requests from the US as it tries to close the notorious island prison.
But Ms Gillard played down the prospect of accepting any former prisoners.
"We will consider any future requests on a case by case basis against these stringent criteria for both national security and immigration," she said.
Despite the latest rejection, there were no hard feelings from Washington - at least for now.
A State Department spokesman said "no derogatory shadow is being cast" on the announcement from Ms Gillard to deny the request made in December to take a small group of inmates.
"We realise that a lot of the people coming aren't the kind of people you might want, so there are no negative signs being hung on this," the spokesman told The Australian.
The Bush administration has been looking at ways to close Guantanamo for the past 12 months, including asking more than 100 countries if they might consider taking some of the 60 or so detainees already cleared for release but facing possible persecution if they were returned to their homeland.
In all, there are about 250 detainees in Guantanamo, including many never likely to be released, such as Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks.
After revelations in The Australian, Ms Gillard said the federal Government advised the US on Saturday that Australia would refuse the latest request.
A spokeswoman for Ms Gillard yesterday said the Government had not received any more requests to resettle inmates. "The Government has received two requests to resettle persons from Guantanamo. Both these requests were considered, and rejected," the spokeswoman said.
"The Government has not received any other request. Any future request would be considered on the same basis, which led to the rejection of all earlier requests."
Referring earlier to the two requests to help house detainees from the war on terror, Ms Gillard said: "Those resettlement requests were considered on a case-by-case basis against Australia's stringent national security and immigration criteria.
"Assessing those requests on a case-by-case basis, (they) have not met those stringent national security and immigration criteria and have been rejected."
Opposition legal affairs spokesman George Brandis said the request should never have been considered by Australia.
"We are speaking about people, terrorism suspects captured on the field of battle, detained in Guantanamo Bay who are among the most dangerous people among the world," Senator Brandis said.
President-elect Barack Obama has said closing Guantanamo is a priority; already there have been several overtures from European countries, including Britain, Portugal and Germany, indicating they could resettle detainees.
While the Bush administration requests have fallen on deaf ears, analysts believe soundings from Europe indicate a willingness to turn over a new leaf with the incoming administration and build bridges with Washington.
However, the public has been to ask why the US cannot sort out a mess of its own making and resettle all the detainees in the US, either releasing them or continuing the incarceration.
The State Department spokesman said it was perfectly understandable that many felt the US should be responsible for any resettlement, and noted "many regions in the US are not looking at this favourably either".
"But we may end up having to take them all," he said.
The father of former Guantanamo inmate David Hicks said he thought Australia should consider taking prisoners from the military prison. Australia had been "hand in hand with the American Government on Guantanamo and "should look at it", Adelaide-based Terry Hicks said yesterday.
He said he thought any security concerns about inmates coming to Australia could be addressed by the existing screening process for refugees. "We take people from all over the world, we don't know what their thoughts are," he said.
"I can't see any difference from Guantanamo people and people we bring from overseas through the settlement process."
The left media here in Australia has made a big deal of demanding that Madame Gillard tell that terrible Pres. G W Bush what he can do with HIS prisoners, after all, he captured them and he should take care of them if HE wants to shut down Guantanamo Bay,fair enough, however these same commentators have been demanding the closure of Guantanamo Bay and the release of it's prisoners because Guantanamo Bay is not necessary because there are no terrorists interned there,for instance, David Hicks or "Our David " as his leftist cheer squad preferred to call him, well if there are no terrorists interned there whats the big deal with these internees coming to Australia ? surely an Australia full of "Our David" clones cant be a bad thing ?
The Left in Australia, the Australian Labor Party,has told Australians since 911 that protecting our nation from terrorism by the implementation of stricter immigration and passport regulations was simply GWBush and John Howard beating their chests inciting fear amongst the Australian and American populations, Australia has nothing to fear from Islam, hey just ask Sheik Hilalie, Keysar Trad and David Hicks aka "Our David"
I saw Madame Gillard refuting any suggestion that her government would accept any Guantanamo Bay internees as requested by GWBush, she then went on to say that every applicant would be accepted on a case by case basis, so if Pres.GWBush says for instance "hey Madame Gillard can you take 20 Muslim terrorists off my hands" she says "no way", however if the United States government (aka Barack Obama) says "hey Madame Gillard can you take 20 Muslim terrorists off my hands" she will look at each one on a "case by case basis", so Obama's Muslim terrorist internees are somehow not a threat to Australia but Pres.GWBush's Muslim terrorist internees are?
It must be said here that Australian PM Kevin Rudd, is, along with all things China and it's political system,one of the most gushing Barack Obama groupies on the planet, he leapt to Obama's defence when the previous PM John Howard suggested that the Taliban would prefer an Obama / Democrat president be elected in 2008 than a Republican, Rudd reacted as would be expected he do so, as all good leftists China,Chavez, Obama groupies,would, when one of their political and ideological soul mates,especially a black one, came under attack from a member of the evil "coalition of the willing" or someone who believed that Islamic terrorism was a threat to the west, the politically correct thought police here rolled out the specter of racism and defied any one in the community to dare agree with Howard lest they suffer Tar and Feathering for daring to criticise one of the "enlightened ones" that are the left.
Now let me see Madame Gillard,President Bush's Islamic Terrorists are BAD,but President Barack Obama's Islamic terrorists are not necessarily BAD,in fact they could, in all likely hood be good, given the election of a man to the US Presidency who is a Black Democrat,and also an apologist for Islam and there fore they should be considered on a case by case basis......mmmmmmmmmm I see.
Given PM Rudd's promise to allow the entry of over one million immigrants into Australia before the year 2010, with a preference given to NON English speaking UN Skilled applicants will these referees from Comrade Obama be included in the one million or will they be in addition to the one million NON English speaking UN skilled quota ?
Madame Gillard will your government ever explain to the Australian people as to why the previous Hawke / Keating Labor government allowed the entry into Australia of Muslims from the middle east,who were refused entry / residency by the Australian Immigration Department in particular Lebanon, just why did the Australian Labor Party over rule the Australian Immigration Department and allow these Muslims into Australia against all advice ?
and could you explain to the Australian people why your party or any government would give preference to immigrants who have declared their hatred for Judeo Christian values and the culture manifested by it, why would the Australian Labor Party in particular enforce a policy of Muslim immigration into Australia, a nation the very antithesis of every thing that the Islamic manifested culture and religion of Islam stand for, just what is it about Australia you despise so much you are so determined to destroy?
Geoff Elliott and Patricia Karvelas
The Australian
January 05, 2009
THE Rudd Government would still be open to overtures from the incoming Obama administration to reconsider its refusal to take inmates from Guantanamo Bay.
After formally rebuffing for the second time the Bush administration on taking former terror suspects being held at Guantanamo, Acting Prime Minister Julia Gillard said Australia would consider subsequent requests from the US as it tries to close the notorious island prison.
But Ms Gillard played down the prospect of accepting any former prisoners.
"We will consider any future requests on a case by case basis against these stringent criteria for both national security and immigration," she said.
Despite the latest rejection, there were no hard feelings from Washington - at least for now.
A State Department spokesman said "no derogatory shadow is being cast" on the announcement from Ms Gillard to deny the request made in December to take a small group of inmates.
"We realise that a lot of the people coming aren't the kind of people you might want, so there are no negative signs being hung on this," the spokesman told The Australian.
The Bush administration has been looking at ways to close Guantanamo for the past 12 months, including asking more than 100 countries if they might consider taking some of the 60 or so detainees already cleared for release but facing possible persecution if they were returned to their homeland.
In all, there are about 250 detainees in Guantanamo, including many never likely to be released, such as Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks.
After revelations in The Australian, Ms Gillard said the federal Government advised the US on Saturday that Australia would refuse the latest request.
A spokeswoman for Ms Gillard yesterday said the Government had not received any more requests to resettle inmates. "The Government has received two requests to resettle persons from Guantanamo. Both these requests were considered, and rejected," the spokeswoman said.
"The Government has not received any other request. Any future request would be considered on the same basis, which led to the rejection of all earlier requests."
Referring earlier to the two requests to help house detainees from the war on terror, Ms Gillard said: "Those resettlement requests were considered on a case-by-case basis against Australia's stringent national security and immigration criteria.
"Assessing those requests on a case-by-case basis, (they) have not met those stringent national security and immigration criteria and have been rejected."
Opposition legal affairs spokesman George Brandis said the request should never have been considered by Australia.
"We are speaking about people, terrorism suspects captured on the field of battle, detained in Guantanamo Bay who are among the most dangerous people among the world," Senator Brandis said.
President-elect Barack Obama has said closing Guantanamo is a priority; already there have been several overtures from European countries, including Britain, Portugal and Germany, indicating they could resettle detainees.
While the Bush administration requests have fallen on deaf ears, analysts believe soundings from Europe indicate a willingness to turn over a new leaf with the incoming administration and build bridges with Washington.
However, the public has been to ask why the US cannot sort out a mess of its own making and resettle all the detainees in the US, either releasing them or continuing the incarceration.
The State Department spokesman said it was perfectly understandable that many felt the US should be responsible for any resettlement, and noted "many regions in the US are not looking at this favourably either".
"But we may end up having to take them all," he said.
The father of former Guantanamo inmate David Hicks said he thought Australia should consider taking prisoners from the military prison. Australia had been "hand in hand with the American Government on Guantanamo and "should look at it", Adelaide-based Terry Hicks said yesterday.
He said he thought any security concerns about inmates coming to Australia could be addressed by the existing screening process for refugees. "We take people from all over the world, we don't know what their thoughts are," he said.
"I can't see any difference from Guantanamo people and people we bring from overseas through the settlement process."
The left media here in Australia has made a big deal of demanding that Madame Gillard tell that terrible Pres. G W Bush what he can do with HIS prisoners, after all, he captured them and he should take care of them if HE wants to shut down Guantanamo Bay,fair enough, however these same commentators have been demanding the closure of Guantanamo Bay and the release of it's prisoners because Guantanamo Bay is not necessary because there are no terrorists interned there,for instance, David Hicks or "Our David " as his leftist cheer squad preferred to call him, well if there are no terrorists interned there whats the big deal with these internees coming to Australia ? surely an Australia full of "Our David" clones cant be a bad thing ?
The Left in Australia, the Australian Labor Party,has told Australians since 911 that protecting our nation from terrorism by the implementation of stricter immigration and passport regulations was simply GWBush and John Howard beating their chests inciting fear amongst the Australian and American populations, Australia has nothing to fear from Islam, hey just ask Sheik Hilalie, Keysar Trad and David Hicks aka "Our David"
I saw Madame Gillard refuting any suggestion that her government would accept any Guantanamo Bay internees as requested by GWBush, she then went on to say that every applicant would be accepted on a case by case basis, so if Pres.GWBush says for instance "hey Madame Gillard can you take 20 Muslim terrorists off my hands" she says "no way", however if the United States government (aka Barack Obama) says "hey Madame Gillard can you take 20 Muslim terrorists off my hands" she will look at each one on a "case by case basis", so Obama's Muslim terrorist internees are somehow not a threat to Australia but Pres.GWBush's Muslim terrorist internees are?
It must be said here that Australian PM Kevin Rudd, is, along with all things China and it's political system,one of the most gushing Barack Obama groupies on the planet, he leapt to Obama's defence when the previous PM John Howard suggested that the Taliban would prefer an Obama / Democrat president be elected in 2008 than a Republican, Rudd reacted as would be expected he do so, as all good leftists China,Chavez, Obama groupies,would, when one of their political and ideological soul mates,especially a black one, came under attack from a member of the evil "coalition of the willing" or someone who believed that Islamic terrorism was a threat to the west, the politically correct thought police here rolled out the specter of racism and defied any one in the community to dare agree with Howard lest they suffer Tar and Feathering for daring to criticise one of the "enlightened ones" that are the left.
Now let me see Madame Gillard,President Bush's Islamic Terrorists are BAD,but President Barack Obama's Islamic terrorists are not necessarily BAD,in fact they could, in all likely hood be good, given the election of a man to the US Presidency who is a Black Democrat,and also an apologist for Islam and there fore they should be considered on a case by case basis......mmmmmmmmmm I see.
Given PM Rudd's promise to allow the entry of over one million immigrants into Australia before the year 2010, with a preference given to NON English speaking UN Skilled applicants will these referees from Comrade Obama be included in the one million or will they be in addition to the one million NON English speaking UN skilled quota ?
Madame Gillard will your government ever explain to the Australian people as to why the previous Hawke / Keating Labor government allowed the entry into Australia of Muslims from the middle east,who were refused entry / residency by the Australian Immigration Department in particular Lebanon, just why did the Australian Labor Party over rule the Australian Immigration Department and allow these Muslims into Australia against all advice ?
and could you explain to the Australian people why your party or any government would give preference to immigrants who have declared their hatred for Judeo Christian values and the culture manifested by it, why would the Australian Labor Party in particular enforce a policy of Muslim immigration into Australia, a nation the very antithesis of every thing that the Islamic manifested culture and religion of Islam stand for, just what is it about Australia you despise so much you are so determined to destroy?
Tuesday, December 02, 2008
Blast from the not so distant past
If Only we would listen......
Too Much Koran......
Too Much Koran......
Those who the Gods are about to destroy they first make crazy
Time to stop slapping Islamists with a wet lettuce in retaliation for their atrocities
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)