An American, Australian ,Israeli, British "Judeo Christian Friendly " blog.
Anthropogenic Global Warming SCAM
Monday, December 30, 2013
Friday, December 27, 2013
SHOCKING SCENES FROM "Concentartion Camp Gaza"
Apologies but these stories and images are too shocking to post at Aussie News & Views, see for yourself what your Government(s) does not want you to ever see at :
ADULTS ONLY SHOCKING SCENES.
A room full of eco-idiots...........Shell finally notices something odd
A room full of eco-idiots
Tony Thomas
The Daily Telegraph
December 19,2013
IT must be a tipping point in the climate debate when a senior Shell executive notices something odd about the green activists with whom he has been consorting.
David Hone, Shell UK's Melbourne-born "senior climate change adviser", went to an academic conference on "radical emission reduction strategies" in London on December 10-11.
He concluded that he had fallen among eco-idiots wanting to remould society from the ground up.
Hone, also a director of the Emissions Trading Association, has a background in oil- and shipping-trade markets. One explanation for his blog outburst could be that he was still in shock from the collapse of carbon pricing and trading schemes at the Warsaw IPCC conference. Hone wrote: "This was a room of catastrophists (as in 'catastrophic global warming'), with the prevailing view, at least to my ears, that the issue could only be addressed by the complete transformation of the global energy and political systems, with the latter moving to one of state control and regulated consumerism. There would be no room for 'ruthless individualism' in such a world. The posters that dotted the lecture theatre lobby area covered topics as diverse as vegan diets to an eventual return to low technology hunter-gatherer societies. Much to my surprise I was not really at an emission reduction conference (despite the label saying I was), but a political ideology conference."
The conference, sadly, was no less unhinged than the UK government's legally mandated goal to cut CO2 emissions by at least 80 per cent below 1990 levels by 2050. Stand by, hardy Britons, for brown and black-outs. Australian national targets are 5 per cent emission cuts by 2020, compared with 2000 levels.
UK climate blogger Andrew Montford noted: "Hone's sudden realisation that many of his fellow-travellers in the environmental movement are completely round the twist is rather comical and you can't help but wonder where he has been in the last 20 years."
At this loopy conference, Australia's ideas on climate catastrophism were well represented. One weblink paper was from Laurence Delina and Dr Mark Diesendorf, of the Institute of Environmental Studies, University of NSW. The title? "Is wartime mobilisation a suitable policy model for rapid national climate mitigation?" No wonder Shell's Hone felt trapped in a madhouse!
Our two experts in war-time mobilisations wrote: "Climate activists assert that rapid mitigation is feasible, invoking the scale and scope of wartime mobilisation strategies. This paper draws upon historical accounts of social, technological and economic restructurings in several countries during World War II in order to investigate potential applications of wartime experience to radical, rigorous and rapid climate mitigation strategies …We find that, while wartime experience suggests some potential strategies for rapid climate mitigation in the areas of finance and labour, it also has severe limitations, resulting from its lack of democratic processes. Furthermore, since restructuring the existing socio-economic system to mitigate climate change is more complex than fighting a war and since the threat of climate change is less obvious to non-scientists, it is unlikely the public will be unified in support of such executive action …"
Yep, that could be right.
Another participant was Professor John Wiseman, of Melbourne University's Sustainable Society Institute, whose weblink talk was titled, ''Winning the climate war: removing political roadblocks to radical emissions reductions''.
I particularly enjoyed a portrait of Professor Wiseman at an Australian conference last October, shown alongside a slide projection quoting excitable green activist Miriam Lyons: "The highest priority action for achieving a rapid transition to a just health and resilient post-carbon future is to sculpt visions of the future that are beautiful, and lifelike enough to fall in love with." (Needless to say, Ms Lyons is a regular guest on Radio National's Drive and Outsiders programs, along with ABC-TV's Q&A and The Drum).
Among Wiseman's authorships is ''Hope, Despair and Transformation: Climate Change and the Promotion of Mental Health and Wellbeing''. Hopefully the absence of global warming since 1997 has restored to sanity the victims of climate scare campaigns.
Another Aussie was Dr Jane O'Sullivan, of the University of Queensland, whose topic was, "Reducing emissions through family planning and women's empowerment." A gung-ho person on carbon taxes, Dr O'Sullivan shows symptoms of Life of Brian's People's Front of Judea divisiveness, being "frustrated by the tangled web of misconceptions and the determination of environmental activists to regard any criticism of the cap-and-trade proposal as climate change denial."
However, our Aussie presenters seem conservative compared to the Poms.
Typical of the green contingent was Pete Brace, an IT nerd and seven-year careerist in computer games, who wound up three years ago in a community called Tinkers Bubble which prohibits fossil fuels. His ambition is zero emissions plus a high quality of life. The whole show, including David Hone's epiphany, would be funny - except that taxpayers, including Australia's, must have funded 90 per cent of it.
Tony Thomas is a writer for Quadrant, where this piece first appeared.
Tony Thomas
The Daily Telegraph
December 19,2013
IT must be a tipping point in the climate debate when a senior Shell executive notices something odd about the green activists with whom he has been consorting.
David Hone, Shell UK's Melbourne-born "senior climate change adviser", went to an academic conference on "radical emission reduction strategies" in London on December 10-11.
He concluded that he had fallen among eco-idiots wanting to remould society from the ground up.
Hone, also a director of the Emissions Trading Association, has a background in oil- and shipping-trade markets. One explanation for his blog outburst could be that he was still in shock from the collapse of carbon pricing and trading schemes at the Warsaw IPCC conference. Hone wrote: "This was a room of catastrophists (as in 'catastrophic global warming'), with the prevailing view, at least to my ears, that the issue could only be addressed by the complete transformation of the global energy and political systems, with the latter moving to one of state control and regulated consumerism. There would be no room for 'ruthless individualism' in such a world. The posters that dotted the lecture theatre lobby area covered topics as diverse as vegan diets to an eventual return to low technology hunter-gatherer societies. Much to my surprise I was not really at an emission reduction conference (despite the label saying I was), but a political ideology conference."
The conference, sadly, was no less unhinged than the UK government's legally mandated goal to cut CO2 emissions by at least 80 per cent below 1990 levels by 2050. Stand by, hardy Britons, for brown and black-outs. Australian national targets are 5 per cent emission cuts by 2020, compared with 2000 levels.
UK climate blogger Andrew Montford noted: "Hone's sudden realisation that many of his fellow-travellers in the environmental movement are completely round the twist is rather comical and you can't help but wonder where he has been in the last 20 years."
At this loopy conference, Australia's ideas on climate catastrophism were well represented. One weblink paper was from Laurence Delina and Dr Mark Diesendorf, of the Institute of Environmental Studies, University of NSW. The title? "Is wartime mobilisation a suitable policy model for rapid national climate mitigation?" No wonder Shell's Hone felt trapped in a madhouse!
Our two experts in war-time mobilisations wrote: "Climate activists assert that rapid mitigation is feasible, invoking the scale and scope of wartime mobilisation strategies. This paper draws upon historical accounts of social, technological and economic restructurings in several countries during World War II in order to investigate potential applications of wartime experience to radical, rigorous and rapid climate mitigation strategies …We find that, while wartime experience suggests some potential strategies for rapid climate mitigation in the areas of finance and labour, it also has severe limitations, resulting from its lack of democratic processes. Furthermore, since restructuring the existing socio-economic system to mitigate climate change is more complex than fighting a war and since the threat of climate change is less obvious to non-scientists, it is unlikely the public will be unified in support of such executive action …"
Yep, that could be right.
Another participant was Professor John Wiseman, of Melbourne University's Sustainable Society Institute, whose weblink talk was titled, ''Winning the climate war: removing political roadblocks to radical emissions reductions''.
I particularly enjoyed a portrait of Professor Wiseman at an Australian conference last October, shown alongside a slide projection quoting excitable green activist Miriam Lyons: "The highest priority action for achieving a rapid transition to a just health and resilient post-carbon future is to sculpt visions of the future that are beautiful, and lifelike enough to fall in love with." (Needless to say, Ms Lyons is a regular guest on Radio National's Drive and Outsiders programs, along with ABC-TV's Q&A and The Drum).
Among Wiseman's authorships is ''Hope, Despair and Transformation: Climate Change and the Promotion of Mental Health and Wellbeing''. Hopefully the absence of global warming since 1997 has restored to sanity the victims of climate scare campaigns.
Another Aussie was Dr Jane O'Sullivan, of the University of Queensland, whose topic was, "Reducing emissions through family planning and women's empowerment." A gung-ho person on carbon taxes, Dr O'Sullivan shows symptoms of Life of Brian's People's Front of Judea divisiveness, being "frustrated by the tangled web of misconceptions and the determination of environmental activists to regard any criticism of the cap-and-trade proposal as climate change denial."
However, our Aussie presenters seem conservative compared to the Poms.
Typical of the green contingent was Pete Brace, an IT nerd and seven-year careerist in computer games, who wound up three years ago in a community called Tinkers Bubble which prohibits fossil fuels. His ambition is zero emissions plus a high quality of life. The whole show, including David Hone's epiphany, would be funny - except that taxpayers, including Australia's, must have funded 90 per cent of it.
Tony Thomas is a writer for Quadrant, where this piece first appeared.
Another Cultural Enrichment Harmony Day gift from Labor Green Loon Multiculturalists
Adelaide pathologist Heddy Zola wants more squat toilets to address needs of large migrant population
Jill Pengelley
The Advertiser
December 25,2013
SQUAT toilets should be considered for new buildings, says a leading pathologist who has had to instruct his staff in correct use of western toilets.
SA Pathology research director Professor Heddy Zola says it is probably time Adelaide acknowledged the cultural needs of its large migrant population.
Squat toilets, also known as Nile pans, are preferred in parts of Asia and Europe.
"In the research environment, the native-born Australian is a rarity," Professor Zola said.
"We do very well with our immigrant population.
"I'm a migrant myself and we do need to accommodate them."
In his monthly research newsletter, he has included a page on "toilet etiquette", which includes a diagram, with a cross through it, of a stick figure standing on a toilet seat.
The instructions also include an appeal not to throw water on the floor.
He said there had been a recurring problem with the state of the toilets in his IMVS building, on Frome Rd.
TELL US: Should more squat toilets be introduced?
At one stage, a PhD student had cleaned up after others to spare the cleaners the task.
"I think it's a mixture of cultural differences and just people not giving a damn about who comes after them,'' Professor Zola said.
He said it would be "sensible" to install squats in new buildings, especially those used by large numbers of migrant students and staff.
"I wouldn't be surprised if in 30 years' time, all buildings had to have both styles,'' he said.
The University of Adelaide has "culturally sensitive amenities" to cater for students and staff from more than 90 countries, a spokeswoman told The Advertiser.
"We have prayer rooms with culturally appropriate ablutions at both Union House and Nexus10 as well as squat toilets in the Ingkarni Wardli building," she said.
"It is important to consider culturally sensitive amenities as part of building development planning.
"Feedback from occupants and visitors alike is invariably positive and it further reinforces the university's values of inclusivity and tolerance."
Flinders University also has installed squat toilets and special washrooms.
UniSA has none but has recognised a problem and placed signs on cubicle doors, asking users not to stand on seats.
The new South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute building on North Terrace does not have squat toilets.
I have seen first hand in the public toilets of a major Sydney Public Hospital the Toilet habits of the Labor Green Loon VOTE People and what they do to normal Toilets as a way of protesting their demands for the imposition of the filth you see above and believe me what you see above would be classed as hygienic by their standards.
I have seen normal Australian toilets trashed by Union / GetUp financed Labor, Green Loon, Cultural Enrichment, Harmony Day Ambassadors, to the extent that they are rendered unusable by Australians in private and public buildings.
Maybe these Labor Green Loon VOTE People and their Progressive apologists are pining for Cholera, Diphtheria, Polio, Diarrhoea,Dysentery,and of course the old "Group Shit" custom of the Middle East.
For Gods sake if this Cultural Enrichment Ambassador,Heddy Zola is the best Adelaide University can come up with in its Pathology Department no wonder people are dying in Hospitals of causes new to Australia.
Just how safe is the Lab he oversees?
"SA Pathology research director Professor Heddy Zola says it is probably time Adelaide acknowledged the cultural needs of its large migrant population."
Its high time Labor Green Loon VOTE People acknowledge that the reason they are here is because they could no longer suffer the Religious Social and Cultural manifestations of whatever nation it was they ran away from,they came here because Australia was NOT like the Godless Shit Hole they decided was not able to produce a standard of living and safety for them and their families and so either illegally entered Australia and asked for shelter or immigrated legally.
Heddy Zola if you and your kind are successful in doing to MY Country what you, your Parents, Grand Parents did to the nation they / you, ran away from, where will you run to next after you and your "Culture" have turned Australia into another third world shit hole?
Jill Pengelley
The Advertiser
December 25,2013
SQUAT toilets should be considered for new buildings, says a leading pathologist who has had to instruct his staff in correct use of western toilets.
SA Pathology research director Professor Heddy Zola says it is probably time Adelaide acknowledged the cultural needs of its large migrant population.
Squat toilets, also known as Nile pans, are preferred in parts of Asia and Europe.
"In the research environment, the native-born Australian is a rarity," Professor Zola said.
"We do very well with our immigrant population.
"I'm a migrant myself and we do need to accommodate them."
In his monthly research newsletter, he has included a page on "toilet etiquette", which includes a diagram, with a cross through it, of a stick figure standing on a toilet seat.
The instructions also include an appeal not to throw water on the floor.
He said there had been a recurring problem with the state of the toilets in his IMVS building, on Frome Rd.
TELL US: Should more squat toilets be introduced?
At one stage, a PhD student had cleaned up after others to spare the cleaners the task.
"I think it's a mixture of cultural differences and just people not giving a damn about who comes after them,'' Professor Zola said.
He said it would be "sensible" to install squats in new buildings, especially those used by large numbers of migrant students and staff.
"I wouldn't be surprised if in 30 years' time, all buildings had to have both styles,'' he said.
The University of Adelaide has "culturally sensitive amenities" to cater for students and staff from more than 90 countries, a spokeswoman told The Advertiser.
"We have prayer rooms with culturally appropriate ablutions at both Union House and Nexus10 as well as squat toilets in the Ingkarni Wardli building," she said.
"It is important to consider culturally sensitive amenities as part of building development planning.
"Feedback from occupants and visitors alike is invariably positive and it further reinforces the university's values of inclusivity and tolerance."
Flinders University also has installed squat toilets and special washrooms.
UniSA has none but has recognised a problem and placed signs on cubicle doors, asking users not to stand on seats.
The new South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute building on North Terrace does not have squat toilets.
I have seen first hand in the public toilets of a major Sydney Public Hospital the Toilet habits of the Labor Green Loon VOTE People and what they do to normal Toilets as a way of protesting their demands for the imposition of the filth you see above and believe me what you see above would be classed as hygienic by their standards.
I have seen normal Australian toilets trashed by Union / GetUp financed Labor, Green Loon, Cultural Enrichment, Harmony Day Ambassadors, to the extent that they are rendered unusable by Australians in private and public buildings.
Maybe these Labor Green Loon VOTE People and their Progressive apologists are pining for Cholera, Diphtheria, Polio, Diarrhoea,Dysentery,and of course the old "Group Shit" custom of the Middle East.
For Gods sake if this Cultural Enrichment Ambassador,Heddy Zola is the best Adelaide University can come up with in its Pathology Department no wonder people are dying in Hospitals of causes new to Australia.
Just how safe is the Lab he oversees?
"SA Pathology research director Professor Heddy Zola says it is probably time Adelaide acknowledged the cultural needs of its large migrant population."
Its high time Labor Green Loon VOTE People acknowledge that the reason they are here is because they could no longer suffer the Religious Social and Cultural manifestations of whatever nation it was they ran away from,they came here because Australia was NOT like the Godless Shit Hole they decided was not able to produce a standard of living and safety for them and their families and so either illegally entered Australia and asked for shelter or immigrated legally.
Heddy Zola if you and your kind are successful in doing to MY Country what you, your Parents, Grand Parents did to the nation they / you, ran away from, where will you run to next after you and your "Culture" have turned Australia into another third world shit hole?
All aboard the "Jesus Express" The morally superior all away in a manger
The morally superior all away in a manger
Roger Franklin
The Daily Telegraph
December 27,2013
Brothers and sisters, let us shun those who every year at this time proclaim that Joseph and Mary were a homeless couple! There are lies, which all Sunday schoolers know are sins, and then there are those gigantic, jaw-dropping whoppers which come with little horns and pitchforks and do the devil's work, and this annual misrepresentation of the Holy Family is one of the biggest of the lot.
Those who would have us believe that Mary and Joseph were a couple of down-on-their-luck bums are also inclined to drop a lot of hints that Jesus might have had a better start in life if only Caesar had collected just a bit more tax to "invest" in government-approved mangers.
Others seem to be under the impression that Mary and Joseph arrived in landlocked Bethlehem aboard a leaky boat.
Atheists and believers differ on whether or not God can move mountains, but there is no doubt Jesus is always being asked to lend a hand when there is a barrow to be pushed, and often by the most unlikely suspects.
Consider NSW University of Technology professor of journalism Wendy Bacon, who earlier this week tweeted a message of support for the illegal arrivals she prefers to call asylum seekers.
She was commenting favourably on another Twitter user's photo of a sign outside a Brisbane church that assured refugees "there's plenty of room at the inn."
Now it should come as no shock that Bacon, a lifelong radical, rejects the quaint notion that it should be policy rather than people smugglers deciding how and when they arrive.
What does surprise is Bacon's sudden respect for Christianity. The last time there is a record of her tapping into the spiritual came when she was charged with obscenity and appeared in court dressed as a nun. Just to make sure the magistrate knew how she felt about religion, her habit bore a graphic announcement claiming intimate knowledge of "God's steel prick".
How many refugees saw that church's sign and appreciated its sentiment is unknown, although the ready guess is that the number would have been few.
Then again, boat people were never the intended audience. Why shouldn't the self-righteous give themselves a little Christmas treat by putting their virtue on display for all to admire? Moral superiority, real and imagined, always makes you feel lovely and warm inside - warmer than a drowned boat person, certainly.
In Toowoomba, copies of the Australian Catholic Bishops' latest statement on social justice, entitled "Lazarus at the Gate", were distributed to the faithful and - surprise! surprise! - Australia was relegated to Santa's naughty list.
"The recent increase in the number of people arriving by boat is insignificant by world standards," the bishops wrote. "In 2012 … as Pakistan struggled to accommodate 1.6 million refugees, Australia's political leaders and media whipped up hysteria over the arrival of 17,000 asylum seekers."
At Eureka Street, a website run and funded by the Jesuits, St Vincent de Paul Society chief executive John Falzon came in on cue with a Christmas hope that capitalism ("not a natural system") will be replaced by something kinder to outcasts and people like Jesus, who, he assures readers, was "born on the fringes of society".
This is just too much. It is one thing to see Wendy Bacon misrepresenting a theology she once thought worthy only of a blasphemous, look-at-me parody, but quite another when the chief executive of a religious charity can't grasp the real meaning of that night in a stable long ago.
Fact is, Mary and Joseph were victims of Big Government - and you can take that as the gospel truth, courtesy of the Gospels themselves. Why did they leave their home in Nazareth? Because the Emperor Augustus ordered all Roman subjects to return to their ancestral homes for a census, thus wasting the couple's time, money and sandal leather to extract information that might have been just as easily obtained if they had been allowed to remain in their own home.
Why were there no rooms available? Because, after issuing the order to hit the road and be counted, Augustus made no provision to accommodate the overnight population surge.
But surely Mary and Joseph were homeless outcasts, right?
Well, they were away from home but certainly not homeless. Joseph was a carpenter, according to the New Testament, and therefore a skilled artisan - about as likely to be mistaken for a homeless man as the next tradie you see scooting by in a ute.
How Jesus might feel about these misrepresentations is anyone's guess, but one thing is for sure: those who paint Him as an outcast should give thanks that the Jehovah of the Old Testament, forever afflicting wrongdoers with plagues and torments, was replaced in Jesus' teachings with the God of love.
Otherwise we could expect an annual blitz of lightning bolts raining down every year at this time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
And this is the Savages contribution to CHRISTmas
Sharia Unveiled
A Muslim woman by the name of Fatima Ali and her friends from the Islamic Center at NYU have crossed the line of disrespect by posing in a mocking photo of the ‘Last Supper of Christ.’
One of our readers pointed out the fact that there are “only 12 people” in this picture, where there should be 13.
The 12 disciples and Jesus. The 12 disciples are represented but Jesus is not. We believe that this omission of Jesus is intentional. The Muslims are essentially making the claim that Jesus did not exist. Credit: Angelos Gavriel
Let them know what you think below:
Contact Information:
Fatima Ali @imanali / New York, NY belledj.tumblr.com
Atif Ateeq (Photographer) - NewYorkCity · @atifateeq / atifateeq.com
- Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/atifateeq?fref=ts
Islamic Center at NYU:
Address: 371 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10014
Phone:(212) 998-4712
Roger Franklin
The Daily Telegraph
December 27,2013
IT is a good thing Jesus is the bringer of peace and forgiveness because every Christmas He must be sorely tempted to do quite a bit of smiting. It's not the commercialisation of his birthday that would bother him so much as the slanders on the good name of his earthly family.
Brothers and sisters, let us shun those who every year at this time proclaim that Joseph and Mary were a homeless couple! There are lies, which all Sunday schoolers know are sins, and then there are those gigantic, jaw-dropping whoppers which come with little horns and pitchforks and do the devil's work, and this annual misrepresentation of the Holy Family is one of the biggest of the lot.
Those who would have us believe that Mary and Joseph were a couple of down-on-their-luck bums are also inclined to drop a lot of hints that Jesus might have had a better start in life if only Caesar had collected just a bit more tax to "invest" in government-approved mangers.
Others seem to be under the impression that Mary and Joseph arrived in landlocked Bethlehem aboard a leaky boat.
Atheists and believers differ on whether or not God can move mountains, but there is no doubt Jesus is always being asked to lend a hand when there is a barrow to be pushed, and often by the most unlikely suspects.
Consider NSW University of Technology professor of journalism Wendy Bacon, who earlier this week tweeted a message of support for the illegal arrivals she prefers to call asylum seekers.
She was commenting favourably on another Twitter user's photo of a sign outside a Brisbane church that assured refugees "there's plenty of room at the inn."Now it should come as no shock that Bacon, a lifelong radical, rejects the quaint notion that it should be policy rather than people smugglers deciding how and when they arrive.
What does surprise is Bacon's sudden respect for Christianity. The last time there is a record of her tapping into the spiritual came when she was charged with obscenity and appeared in court dressed as a nun. Just to make sure the magistrate knew how she felt about religion, her habit bore a graphic announcement claiming intimate knowledge of "God's steel prick".
How many refugees saw that church's sign and appreciated its sentiment is unknown, although the ready guess is that the number would have been few.
Then again, boat people were never the intended audience. Why shouldn't the self-righteous give themselves a little Christmas treat by putting their virtue on display for all to admire? Moral superiority, real and imagined, always makes you feel lovely and warm inside - warmer than a drowned boat person, certainly.
In Toowoomba, copies of the Australian Catholic Bishops' latest statement on social justice, entitled "Lazarus at the Gate", were distributed to the faithful and - surprise! surprise! - Australia was relegated to Santa's naughty list.
"The recent increase in the number of people arriving by boat is insignificant by world standards," the bishops wrote. "In 2012 … as Pakistan struggled to accommodate 1.6 million refugees, Australia's political leaders and media whipped up hysteria over the arrival of 17,000 asylum seekers."
At Eureka Street, a website run and funded by the Jesuits, St Vincent de Paul Society chief executive John Falzon came in on cue with a Christmas hope that capitalism ("not a natural system") will be replaced by something kinder to outcasts and people like Jesus, who, he assures readers, was "born on the fringes of society".
This is just too much. It is one thing to see Wendy Bacon misrepresenting a theology she once thought worthy only of a blasphemous, look-at-me parody, but quite another when the chief executive of a religious charity can't grasp the real meaning of that night in a stable long ago.
Fact is, Mary and Joseph were victims of Big Government - and you can take that as the gospel truth, courtesy of the Gospels themselves. Why did they leave their home in Nazareth? Because the Emperor Augustus ordered all Roman subjects to return to their ancestral homes for a census, thus wasting the couple's time, money and sandal leather to extract information that might have been just as easily obtained if they had been allowed to remain in their own home.
Why were there no rooms available? Because, after issuing the order to hit the road and be counted, Augustus made no provision to accommodate the overnight population surge.
But surely Mary and Joseph were homeless outcasts, right?
Well, they were away from home but certainly not homeless. Joseph was a carpenter, according to the New Testament, and therefore a skilled artisan - about as likely to be mistaken for a homeless man as the next tradie you see scooting by in a ute.
How Jesus might feel about these misrepresentations is anyone's guess, but one thing is for sure: those who paint Him as an outcast should give thanks that the Jehovah of the Old Testament, forever afflicting wrongdoers with plagues and torments, was replaced in Jesus' teachings with the God of love.
Otherwise we could expect an annual blitz of lightning bolts raining down every year at this time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
And this is the Savages contribution to CHRISTmas
Sharia Unveiled
A Muslim woman by the name of Fatima Ali and her friends from the Islamic Center at NYU have crossed the line of disrespect by posing in a mocking photo of the ‘Last Supper of Christ.’
One of our readers pointed out the fact that there are “only 12 people” in this picture, where there should be 13.
The 12 disciples and Jesus. The 12 disciples are represented but Jesus is not. We believe that this omission of Jesus is intentional. The Muslims are essentially making the claim that Jesus did not exist. Credit: Angelos Gavriel
Let them know what you think below:
Contact Information:
Fatima Ali @imanali / New York, NY belledj.tumblr.com
Atif Ateeq (Photographer) - NewYorkCity · @atifateeq / atifateeq.com
- Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/atifateeq?fref=ts
Islamic Center at NYU:
Address: 371 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10014
Phone:(212) 998-4712
Jesus #1 in Top Ten of Human History, Satan's Paedophile Slave Trader Pirate Moon Worshipper and Mass Murderer runs a poor third behind Napoleon.
Jesus towers above everyone in history
Michael Frost
Manly Daily Pg.26
21 Dec 2013
IN CASE you have wondered why we still celebrate Jesus’ birth in our increasingly secular society, his influence on history alone should be enough of an answer.
He was recently ranked the biggest name in human history. Ever.
So say the authors of a new book, Who’s Bigger: Where Historical Figures Really
Rank, who used “culturometrics,” a fancy term to describe quantitative data analysis, to figure out that Jesus stood above all.
Their top 100 was a bit of a surprise to most people. Everyone is overwhelmingly white and 97 are male, with the only women being Queen Elizabeth I (No.13), Queen Victoria (No.16), and St. Joan of Arc (No.95).
The top 10 people in history were (in order) Jesus, Napoleon, Muhammad, William Shakespeare, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Adolf Hitler, Aristotle, Alexander the Great and Thomas Jefferson.
The research was primarily based on Wikipedia and Google ngrams (a searchable collection of words in scanned English language books), which is why the list was biased toward an Anglo-American, English-language version of history.
Nonetheless, as you enjoy Christmas Day, even if you’re not religious, spare a thought for the towering historical figure whose birth you’re celebrating.
His teaching about loving your neighbour, forgiving your enemy and caring for the poor has found its way into our collective consciousness and our legal system.
His view of God as a loving father shapes much of our thinking. His example of sacrifice and service has moulded many of our beliefs about human excellence.
All this is incredible when you consider that he was born in an obscure village, the child of peasants. He never wrote a book, never held office, never went to college, and never travelled more than two hundred miles from the place where he was born.
And yet as James Allen once wrote: All the armies that have ever marched All the navies that have ever sailed All the parliaments that have ever sat All the kings that ever reigned put together Have not affected the life of humankind on earth
Michael Frost
Manly Daily Pg.26
21 Dec 2013
IN CASE you have wondered why we still celebrate Jesus’ birth in our increasingly secular society, his influence on history alone should be enough of an answer.
He was recently ranked the biggest name in human history. Ever.
So say the authors of a new book, Who’s Bigger: Where Historical Figures Really
Rank, who used “culturometrics,” a fancy term to describe quantitative data analysis, to figure out that Jesus stood above all.
Their top 100 was a bit of a surprise to most people. Everyone is overwhelmingly white and 97 are male, with the only women being Queen Elizabeth I (No.13), Queen Victoria (No.16), and St. Joan of Arc (No.95).
The top 10 people in history were (in order) Jesus, Napoleon, Muhammad, William Shakespeare, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Adolf Hitler, Aristotle, Alexander the Great and Thomas Jefferson.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third Prize goes to Muhammad
Dante described hell for Muhammad
A cask by losing centre-piece or cant
Was never shattered so, as I saw one
Rent from the chin to where one breaketh wind.
Between his legs were hanging down his entrails;
His heart was visible, and the dismal sack
That maketh excrement of what is eaten.
While I was all absorbed in seeing him,
He looked at me, and opened with his hands
His bosom, saying: "See now how I rend me;
How mutilated, see, is Mahomet;
In front of me doth Ali weeping go,
Cleft in the face from forelock unto chin;
And all the others whom thou here beholdest,
Disseminators of scandal and of schism
While living were, and therefore are cleft thus.
A devil is behind here, who doth cleave us
Thus cruelly, unto the falchion's edge
Putting again each one of all this ream,
When we have gone around the doleful road;
By reason that our wounds are closed again
Ere any one in front of him repass.
- Dante's Inferno, Canto 28
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonetheless, as you enjoy Christmas Day, even if you’re not religious, spare a thought for the towering historical figure whose birth you’re celebrating.
His teaching about loving your neighbour, forgiving your enemy and caring for the poor has found its way into our collective consciousness and our legal system.
His view of God as a loving father shapes much of our thinking. His example of sacrifice and service has moulded many of our beliefs about human excellence.
All this is incredible when you consider that he was born in an obscure village, the child of peasants. He never wrote a book, never held office, never went to college, and never travelled more than two hundred miles from the place where he was born.
And yet as James Allen once wrote: All the armies that have ever marched All the navies that have ever sailed All the parliaments that have ever sat All the kings that ever reigned put together Have not affected the life of humankind on earth
Saturday, December 21, 2013
Whilst the Muslim Brotherhoods President of the United States has been busy financing and facilitating Islamic Terrorism in the Middle East............
Chinese media reports of plans to build a 110,000 ton 'super aircraft carrier' to rival US naval power
Jamie Seidel
The Daily Telegraph
December 21,2013
CHINA has declared it is building a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier of a size to rival the biggest in United States naval service in the first move of a major new arms race.
Chinese website qianzhan.com cites "top People's Liberation Army" sources as saying the 110,000-ton aircraft carrier should be launched by 2020.
"By that time, China will be able to confront the most advanced US carrier-based fighter jets in high sea," the Chinese-language article reads
The news follows rising tensions in the South and East China Seas where the most recent incident involved a near-collision with a US cruiser shadowing China's first aircraft carrier, the refurbished Liaoning which was purchased from Ukraine.
China's first homegrown aircraft carrier will be a larger version of Liaoning. The first of two such vessels is due to hit the water in 2015.
The design is reportedly based on drawings from the former Soviet Union of a nuclear-powered, 80,000 ton vessel capable of carrying 60 aircraft.
"Despite their lack of experience, Chinese scientific research personnel have the ambition to overcome various difficulties to master lots of new technologies and techniques in building China's own powerful aircraft carrier," the article reads.
Jamie Seidel
The Daily Telegraph
December 21,2013
CHINA has declared it is building a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier of a size to rival the biggest in United States naval service in the first move of a major new arms race.
"By that time, China will be able to confront the most advanced US carrier-based fighter jets in high sea," the Chinese-language article reads
The news follows rising tensions in the South and East China Seas where the most recent incident involved a near-collision with a US cruiser shadowing China's first aircraft carrier, the refurbished Liaoning which was purchased from Ukraine.
China's first homegrown aircraft carrier will be a larger version of Liaoning. The first of two such vessels is due to hit the water in 2015.
The design is reportedly based on drawings from the former Soviet Union of a nuclear-powered, 80,000 ton vessel capable of carrying 60 aircraft.
"Despite their lack of experience, Chinese scientific research personnel have the ambition to overcome various difficulties to master lots of new technologies and techniques in building China's own powerful aircraft carrier," the article reads.
Monday, December 16, 2013
Australia, a land where dowes Yankees don't know shit bout our laws and Wimmins / Persons Rights .
US headquarters rules Mikaila not fit for Aussie lingerie Football League
Elisa Black
Sunday Mail
December 15, 2013
SHE can bench press 100kg and runs 10km three times a week.
But according to the Legends Football League, Australia's version of the controversial American Lingerie League, 18-year-old Mikaila Perrett's last-minute exclusion from the team had nothing to do with her looks or size, but was because she isn't fit enough.
Mikaila said it was only as she went to put on her uniform to pose for the team photo - having travelled to Sydney with the Queensland Brigade after being named on the starting team last weekend - that she was told that she wasn't allowed to gear up for the photograph or play.
Having trained in the sport for 18 months, Mikaila had sent a photo of herself in a bikini to the sport's American headquarters for approval.
"They told me I was not lean enough so I trained my arse off and dropped another five kilograms, but apparently it was still not enough,'' Mikaila said.
"I cried, bawled my eyes out. It had already affected me and the looks component was in my mind but this has kind of affected my self-esteem and I'm not so confident anymore.
"It's very looks focused. I go to the gym with one of the girls who has been named as one of the players to watch, she said she needed to stop eating.
"Some of the girls are starving themselves to be OK."
Mikaila's dad, Randy Perrett, said the league's claims it is an elite sport are rubbish.
"(Legends Football League chairman) Mitch Mortaza has always maintained that the game is about skill not skin,'' he said.
"She flew to Sydney with the team, paid for a spray tan as is compulsory only to be told right before the game that she wasn't approved to wear the uniform.
"It's never been mentioned that her fitness is in question, it's always been her looks that have been mentioned."
But a spokeswoman for LFL Australia insisted it was Mikaila's fitness was the problem.
"Much like any high profile sport federation or club, there are physical fitness standards to enable the athlete to achieve maximum performance levels,'' she said.
Elisa Black
Sunday Mail
December 15, 2013
SHE can bench press 100kg and runs 10km three times a week.
She pushes a tractor tyre up and down the road to build strength and was, until recently, a national swimming champion. She is 175cm tall and weighs 95kg, and her strength scored her positions as middle-line backer and centre with Legends Football League's Queensland Brigade.
But according to the Legends Football League, Australia's version of the controversial American Lingerie League, 18-year-old Mikaila Perrett's last-minute exclusion from the team had nothing to do with her looks or size, but was because she isn't fit enough.
Mikaila said it was only as she went to put on her uniform to pose for the team photo - having travelled to Sydney with the Queensland Brigade after being named on the starting team last weekend - that she was told that she wasn't allowed to gear up for the photograph or play.
Having trained in the sport for 18 months, Mikaila had sent a photo of herself in a bikini to the sport's American headquarters for approval.
"They told me I was not lean enough so I trained my arse off and dropped another five kilograms, but apparently it was still not enough,'' Mikaila said.
"I cried, bawled my eyes out. It had already affected me and the looks component was in my mind but this has kind of affected my self-esteem and I'm not so confident anymore.
"It's very looks focused. I go to the gym with one of the girls who has been named as one of the players to watch, she said she needed to stop eating.
"Some of the girls are starving themselves to be OK."
Mikaila's dad, Randy Perrett, said the league's claims it is an elite sport are rubbish.
"(Legends Football League chairman) Mitch Mortaza has always maintained that the game is about skill not skin,'' he said.
"She flew to Sydney with the team, paid for a spray tan as is compulsory only to be told right before the game that she wasn't approved to wear the uniform.
"It's never been mentioned that her fitness is in question, it's always been her looks that have been mentioned."
But a spokeswoman for LFL Australia insisted it was Mikaila's fitness was the problem.
"Much like any high profile sport federation or club, there are physical fitness standards to enable the athlete to achieve maximum performance levels,'' she said.
Hey lets get real here we are all adults after all, I think we know what this Sheila is hoping to sell here,that said, in Australia, in my humble opinon, she has a case to sue the shit out of the promoters of the Lingerie League for one reason and one alone.
In Australia the inability to achieve the physical standards of an employers requirements are irrelevant when a FEMALE applicant applies for employment, the ability to perform the physical requirements are not applicable when a FEMALE applicant applies for a position of employment in Australia.
The various Australian State and Federal Police Forces, Fire Brigades, Ambulance / Rescue Services are proof positive of my assertion that Female applicants are exempt from the obligation to full fill physical requirements (running jumping climbing pulling a trigger on a gun carrying a wounded fellow employee victim swimming leaping bounding lifting pulling patient out of the shit as well as themselves etc etc etc )
The same exemptions for females are applied to the Australian Armed Forces.
In order to achieve the sacred Goal of "Equality" the Sex of the applicant is the over riding consideration in the NSW Fire Brigade, a minimum 50 % Female staffing target is the present objective of the NSW Fire Brigade recruitment office irrespective of the ability of the applicant to perform the requirements of the duties of a Fireman.
Gay and disabled and Non English speaking applicants are also fast tracked through the NSW Police Force and NSW Fire Brigades the NSW Ambulance Service has longs been a haven for Gay and Lesbian recruits who receive preferrential treatment when applying for employment,the same as Male QANTAS Cabin Crew.
I am sure that should this Lady get her Arse into gear and find a MANAGER who is PC literate she and indeed he will be rolling in clover in a very short time after all the Sista Hood has already done all the hard work for them, its just a matter of getting the Lingerie Football Mob to sign the cheque and she and he fill in the amount of the 'Hurt" and "Pain" she suffered after been told she was not fit enough, hey in Australia the ability to do what you are been paid for at a standard required to do so by the people paying your wages does not count, you see in Australia every Woman has the right to do whatever they want to do even if they are physically or mentally unable to do so.
Dont ya just Luv this STRAYLIA ?
Former LOVERS OF AIDS infector Chris Muronzi Invoke Buyers Remorse.. but hey If you are a Progressive, what better way to prove ya cred than Fucking one of does a Modda Fukkas?
The toxic betrayal of Chris Muronzi: more women reveal past with convicted AIDS infector
Mark Morri Crime Editor
The Daily Telegraph
December 16, 2013
FORMER lovers of convicted AIDS infector Chris Muronzi have contacted NSW police believing they may have contracted the disease from the 44-year-old, who has been jailed after he kept secret from a partner he was a carrier of the virus.
The women came forward after it was revealed Muronzi infected another woman, with whom he had a nine-month relationship in 2002.
Muronzi had known for years he was infected but did not tell her.
Last month he was jailed after pleading guilty to maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm on the woman. He was jailed for four and a half years.
During his sentencing a number of women contacted The Daily Telegraph saying they had AIDS and had also been in a relationship with Muronzi. That information has been passed on to police, who are now investigating.
"I was also diagnosed with HIV last year and have had an on and off thing with Chris Muronzi, the man in your article, over the past 10-11 years. He never disclosed his HIV status to me either,'' one woman said.
It was a similar story to the one told by another young woman when she walked into Maroubra police station in 2011 and said she believed she had been infected by Muronzi during their relationship almost 10 years earlier.
The next day police interviewed Muronzi, who was then 42 and working as a financial controller and living in Neutral Bay. So began the case which culminated in last month's sentence.
Detective Senior Constable Ryan Morgan, the officer in charge of the case, said initially Muronzi ''didn't say very much at all''.
"The investigation began with accessing his medical records and interviewing doctors who had treated Mr Muronzi,'' he said.
It unfolded Muronzi had attended the Albion St Clinic in June 1993, where he was diagnosed with HIV.
"At that time the doctor informed Mr Muronzi of his legal obligations in relation to informing any partners about his status, and subsequent doctors also told him,'' Senior Constable Ryan said.
He said it was blatantly obvious from his medical records that Muronzi was aware he was a carrier and was being treated for years for HIV.
Muronzi initially pleaded not guilty but, as the evidence mounted, changed his plea.
The clincher came when police were able to prove the victim's strain of HIV originated from southern Africa near Zimbabwe, where Muronzi came from, after spending more than $12,000 on DNA testing.
Also blood samples taken from both the woman and Muronzi at the time were found and fresh samples taken for analysis.
The woman is now married and still living in Sydney and yesterday told The Daily Telegraph yesterday it took many years of coming to terms with the illness before she felt she could tell police.
She said her diagnosis left her with "issues of feeling violated, of betrayal and trust".
"I have been trying to quantify the impact of unknowingly acquiring HIV ... due to the dishonesty and recklessness of Chris Muronzi who I put my trust in as a partner," she said.
Muronzi will be eligible for parole in September 2016.
Mark Morri Crime Editor
The Daily Telegraph
December 16, 2013
FORMER lovers of convicted AIDS infector Chris Muronzi have contacted NSW police believing they may have contracted the disease from the 44-year-old, who has been jailed after he kept secret from a partner he was a carrier of the virus.
How could ANY Progressive,Man or Woman NOT like him?
Isn't AIDS Just another querky manifestation of the Progressives "Gay Lifestyle" that,by Law cannot be discriminated against ?
Call me crazy, but HEY,I would suggest that no one, even a Progressive True Believer take it UP THE CLACKER from any of your Labor Green Loon preferred VOTE Diversity People
Call me crazy, but HEY,I would suggest that no one, even a Progressive True Believer take it UP THE CLACKER from any of your Labor Green Loon preferred VOTE Diversity People
The women came forward after it was revealed Muronzi infected another woman, with whom he had a nine-month relationship in 2002.
Muronzi had known for years he was infected but did not tell her.
Last month he was jailed after pleading guilty to maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm on the woman. He was jailed for four and a half years.
During his sentencing a number of women contacted The Daily Telegraph saying they had AIDS and had also been in a relationship with Muronzi. That information has been passed on to police, who are now investigating.
"I was also diagnosed with HIV last year and have had an on and off thing with Chris Muronzi, the man in your article, over the past 10-11 years. He never disclosed his HIV status to me either,'' one woman said.
It was a similar story to the one told by another young woman when she walked into Maroubra police station in 2011 and said she believed she had been infected by Muronzi during their relationship almost 10 years earlier.
The next day police interviewed Muronzi, who was then 42 and working as a financial controller and living in Neutral Bay. So began the case which culminated in last month's sentence.
Detective Senior Constable Ryan Morgan, the officer in charge of the case, said initially Muronzi ''didn't say very much at all''.
"The investigation began with accessing his medical records and interviewing doctors who had treated Mr Muronzi,'' he said.
It unfolded Muronzi had attended the Albion St Clinic in June 1993, where he was diagnosed with HIV.
"At that time the doctor informed Mr Muronzi of his legal obligations in relation to informing any partners about his status, and subsequent doctors also told him,'' Senior Constable Ryan said.
He said it was blatantly obvious from his medical records that Muronzi was aware he was a carrier and was being treated for years for HIV.
Muronzi initially pleaded not guilty but, as the evidence mounted, changed his plea.
The clincher came when police were able to prove the victim's strain of HIV originated from southern Africa near Zimbabwe, where Muronzi came from, after spending more than $12,000 on DNA testing.
Also blood samples taken from both the woman and Muronzi at the time were found and fresh samples taken for analysis.
The woman is now married and still living in Sydney and yesterday told The Daily Telegraph yesterday it took many years of coming to terms with the illness before she felt she could tell police.
She said her diagnosis left her with "issues of feeling violated, of betrayal and trust".
"I have been trying to quantify the impact of unknowingly acquiring HIV ... due to the dishonesty and recklessness of Chris Muronzi who I put my trust in as a partner," she said.
Muronzi will be eligible for parole in September 2016.
Amazing scenes as Arsonist Financier arrives at Fire Scene with Fire Fighting strategy.......... Fuck You sKOt where ya been the past 16 years, girl / boyfriend got ya toungue?
Small measures a giant leap away from booze-fuelled violence
Scott Weber
The Daily Telegraph
December 16, 2013
THE number of alcohol-related violence incidents skyrockets over summer,putting the community and our emergency service workers at increased risk. It's an unfortunate fact that the chances of us waking up to news of another alcohol-related death or life-altering injury over the coming months are disturbingly high.
Just this weekend we've seen many serious assaults. One left a man in a coma.
The NSW government knows how great the risks are and recently announced a few measures aimed at curbing the number of assaults on our streets. Trouble is, they don't go far enough and tend to focus more on mopping up the mess than stopping it at the source.
While any measure that helps reduce alcohol-fuelled violence is a step in the right direction, we are past the point of little steps - we need a giant leap in the right direction if we're to seriously combat the issue. And the giant leap we need is the Newcastle measures - the suite of measures that has resulted in a 37 per cent decrease in late night assaults and a 26 per cent decrease in emergency department admissions in the area.
The Newcastle measures include reduced trading hours, lockouts and restrictions on the sale of high alcohol-content drinks. Modest, evidence-based measures that are proven to work.
So solid is the evidence that licenced venues in Tamworth recently voluntarily introduced similar measures to deal with the town's burgeoning alcohol problem.
Some in the alcohol industry claim that the Newcastle measures don't work. They're telling anyone who will listen that NSW doesn't have an alcohol problem at all - things are on the mend and we needn't worry ourselves about it.
Try telling the families of the victims of alcohol-fuelled violence that we don't have a problem, or telling the doctors, nurses, paramedics and police who spend the vast majority of their weekends dealing with victims of boozed-up thugs that everything is fine.
It's true, as the alcohol industry keeps telling us, that the overall number of assaults in NSW has fallen slightly over the past years. It's an exciting trend and police are working to ensure the downward spiral continues. But it's far from good enough.
NSW does have an alcohol problem and we desperately need decision-makers with enough gumption to do something about it.
Scott Weber is Last Drinks coalition spokesman and president of the Police Association of NSW.
Scott COME CLEAN Your first responsibility is to ensure the collection of union dues from members of the NSW Poilce Force for the purpose of financing the NSW Branch of the Australian Labor Party.
You and your "association" aka.one of the many fund raising arms of the ACTU, specifically imposed upon the staff of the various employment opportunities, for the funding of the ALP,were silent for 16 years when the Political Party that your 'Association" finances with your members Union Fees, aka. "lisence to work and feed yourself and family",is donated to the Australian Labor Party, irrespective of who the victims of the NSW Police Associations right to garneshee their hard earned wages votes for.
Scott come clean!!!! Your first and last responsibility is to ensure that the ideology of YOUR "associations" Political Party,the Socialist Australian Labor Green Loon Co Party is what inculcates Law and Order in NSW via the NSW Police Force via the mantra of whats good for "Da Rank and File" Da Memba's.
Fuck You sKOt
u Kan know LON GA PraTend TA b a Firrrrr persin whilst collecting Mon e to pay Da Arse on est fro mmmmmm da wur kas Wag es
Scott Weber
The Daily Telegraph
December 16, 2013
THE number of alcohol-related violence incidents skyrockets over summer,putting the community and our emergency service workers at increased risk. It's an unfortunate fact that the chances of us waking up to news of another alcohol-related death or life-altering injury over the coming months are disturbingly high.
Just this weekend we've seen many serious assaults. One left a man in a coma.
The NSW government knows how great the risks are and recently announced a few measures aimed at curbing the number of assaults on our streets. Trouble is, they don't go far enough and tend to focus more on mopping up the mess than stopping it at the source.
While any measure that helps reduce alcohol-fuelled violence is a step in the right direction, we are past the point of little steps - we need a giant leap in the right direction if we're to seriously combat the issue. And the giant leap we need is the Newcastle measures - the suite of measures that has resulted in a 37 per cent decrease in late night assaults and a 26 per cent decrease in emergency department admissions in the area.
The Newcastle measures include reduced trading hours, lockouts and restrictions on the sale of high alcohol-content drinks. Modest, evidence-based measures that are proven to work.
So solid is the evidence that licenced venues in Tamworth recently voluntarily introduced similar measures to deal with the town's burgeoning alcohol problem.
Some in the alcohol industry claim that the Newcastle measures don't work. They're telling anyone who will listen that NSW doesn't have an alcohol problem at all - things are on the mend and we needn't worry ourselves about it.
Try telling the families of the victims of alcohol-fuelled violence that we don't have a problem, or telling the doctors, nurses, paramedics and police who spend the vast majority of their weekends dealing with victims of boozed-up thugs that everything is fine.
It's true, as the alcohol industry keeps telling us, that the overall number of assaults in NSW has fallen slightly over the past years. It's an exciting trend and police are working to ensure the downward spiral continues. But it's far from good enough.
NSW does have an alcohol problem and we desperately need decision-makers with enough gumption to do something about it.
Scott Weber is Last Drinks coalition spokesman and president of the Police Association of NSW.
Scott COME CLEAN Your first responsibility is to ensure the collection of union dues from members of the NSW Poilce Force for the purpose of financing the NSW Branch of the Australian Labor Party.
You and your "association" aka.one of the many fund raising arms of the ACTU, specifically imposed upon the staff of the various employment opportunities, for the funding of the ALP,were silent for 16 years when the Political Party that your 'Association" finances with your members Union Fees, aka. "lisence to work and feed yourself and family",is donated to the Australian Labor Party, irrespective of who the victims of the NSW Police Associations right to garneshee their hard earned wages votes for.
Scott come clean!!!! Your first and last responsibility is to ensure that the ideology of YOUR "associations" Political Party,the Socialist Australian Labor Green Loon Co Party is what inculcates Law and Order in NSW via the NSW Police Force via the mantra of whats good for "Da Rank and File" Da Memba's.
Fuck You sKOt
u Kan know LON GA PraTend TA b a Firrrrr persin whilst collecting Mon e to pay Da Arse on est fro mmmmmm da wur kas Wag es
Fred Nile and Silvana Nero wed today and why the Leftist Progressives and the "Gay Community" Hate them
Lancelot Linkers Crash Fred Nile and Silvana Nero's Wedding.
Reverend Fred Nile marries Silvana Nero - says his late wife Elaine would have approved
Alicia Wood Political Reporter
The Daily Telegraph
December 16,2013
IT was NSW parliament's answer to the royal wedding - complete with a diamond tiara.
Silvana Nero, 55, wore the jewel-encrusted headpiece and a floor-length gown as she married controversial MP the Reverend Fred Nile, 79, yesterday.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott sent a letter saying he hoped it was one of the couple's "happiest days".
"Marriage is about walking the same path together. It is a profound, rich and fulfilling journey that should draw out the better angels of our nature," Mr Abbott wrote.
Reverend Simon Manchester opened the wedding service by acknowledging Mr Nile's children - whose support for the union was crucial for the couple - and their mother, the late Elaine Nile, who died in 2011. "Elaine, even at the close of her life, was encouraging Fred to remarry,'' the reverend said.
The couple joined friends and family outside the church. At the gates there was another, smaller crowd including Viva La Bang, in a high blonde wig and bridal gown, and partner Brae Michaels, who were protesting against Mr Nile's stance against gay marriage.
"He made comments that we have divided Australian politics and degraded Australian politics for the last 10 years and we're here to show him we should have the same rights as everybody else," La Bang said.
Reverend Fred Nile marries Silvana Nero - says his late wife Elaine would have approved
Alicia Wood Political Reporter
The Daily Telegraph
December 16,2013
IT was NSW parliament's answer to the royal wedding - complete with a diamond tiara.
Silvana Nero, 55, wore the jewel-encrusted headpiece and a floor-length gown as she married controversial MP the Reverend Fred Nile, 79, yesterday.
The best man was Liberal hard-right faction boss David Clarke while Treasurer Mike Baird, Attorney-General Greg Smith, Roads Minister Duncan Gay, new Energy Minister Anthony Roberts, former Energy minister Chris Hartcher and Labor MPs Walt Secord and Luke Foley were in the pews at St Thomas' Anglican Church North Sydney.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott sent a letter saying he hoped it was one of the couple's "happiest days".
"Marriage is about walking the same path together. It is a profound, rich and fulfilling journey that should draw out the better angels of our nature," Mr Abbott wrote.
Reverend Simon Manchester opened the wedding service by acknowledging Mr Nile's children - whose support for the union was crucial for the couple - and their mother, the late Elaine Nile, who died in 2011. "Elaine, even at the close of her life, was encouraging Fred to remarry,'' the reverend said.
The couple joined friends and family outside the church. At the gates there was another, smaller crowd including Viva La Bang, in a high blonde wig and bridal gown, and partner Brae Michaels, who were protesting against Mr Nile's stance against gay marriage.
Why the Progressives and the "Gay Community" and their Media apologists Hate Fred
"He made comments that we have divided Australian politics and degraded Australian politics for the last 10 years and we're here to show him we should have the same rights as everybody else," La Bang said.
Sunday, December 15, 2013
Judge claims Psychologists' reports on criminals are too similar ........Gee Who Da Thunk It Possible?
I have had first hand experience with Psychiatrist's in the Supreme Court of NSW, in a case that lasted in excess of eight years.
These "experts" are,in far too many cases, self appointed activists,social change merchants / agents, who will write reports conducive to whatever outcome they deem suitable to the case and their progressive social agenda.
In my case the "social change progressive" was outed in the witness box under cross examination by my Barrister, who elicited admissions, among many others of
Barrister XXXXXX
Question :
'is it true that at the time of writing and completing this report relied upon by the defendant, sworn and written by you and submitted to the court as an affidavit you had yet to meet or interview XXXXX, the subject of this report contained in the affidavit' ? "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXX
Answer : Yes
There was much much more damning testimony under oath, however it is too difficult to write here without revealing identities of plaintiff deponents.
I have not and at this time will not seek a lifting of a 'Closed Court" order so as to enable public access to the NSW Supreme Court proceedings initiated by myself.
The defendants "Expert Psychiarist" shortly after this admission under oath of the Supreme Court of NSW, was the Camera Hogging Boastful Star Witness,informant,of an Australian National Current Affairs program, alleging all sorts of "wrongs" against the NSW Health Commission regarding the funding and other "goings on" of an XXXXXX program for youths and children. Viewers of the story were outraged, and rightly so, after listening to the expert allegations of the caring and sharing Dr XXXXXXXX .
Approximately a week later the subjects of the caring and sharing Dr XXXXXXX damning allegations were answered one by one by the NSW Health Commission on the same National Current Affairs program.
During the refutations of the "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXXX by the NSW Health Commissions representative, it was revealed that the "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXXX bank account was in fact the real victim of the due diligence of the NSW Health Commission and that the "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXXX "victims" were in fact better off, free of the input,caring and sharing of "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXXX "
The allegations of "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXXX "were refuted by the representative in their entirety, the National Current Affairs program accepted those refutations as been the truth.
At the time of my commencing proceedings as a plaintiff in my matter the "Expert Psychiarist Dr XXXXX" was well known in legal circles as "Liar for Hire" Mr Mrs Miss Ms Dr XXXXX aka. Liar for Hire, was an inhabitant of what is known a "Red Square" a part of Sydney's XXXXXX Street Professional, Medical and Legal Hub.
During the course of my litigation (over 8 years in the Supreme Court of NSW) I was threatened / intimidated by the "Expert Psychiarist Dr XXXXX" repeated use of whoever the Supreme Court Judge listed to hear my matter was,first name been used over and over during the course of our discussions and suggestions that J.XXXXXX and that "Expert Psychiarist Dr XXXXX" and J.XXXXXX had by coincidence recently attended a BBQ at the home of another J. XXXXX who had heard interlocutory proceedings in my litigation.
This intimidation was not confined to "Expert Psychiarist Dr XXXXX" it was on one occasion used by the head of the XXXXXX mediation / counselling service.
I was told that my action had no merit in THEIR opinion regardless of my sworn testimony under oath and that same testimony surviving cross examination by NSW Government appointed and tax payer funded lawyers, and as such should not be considered by the Supreme Court of NSW, and that I should reconsider the errors of my ways.
The various Judges of the Supreme Court of NSW who heard from the first day of hearing my various motions accepted my evidence and that of the NSW Supreme Court appointed expert witness and others who gave testimony on my behalf, not only in the first instance in a Court of a different jurisdiction, but in the first and subsequent hearings of 18 or was it 21? appearances over 8 plus years in the NSW Supreme Court.
Despite my never having a Justice of the Supreme Court of NSW ruling against me,I was forced to appear in the Supreme Court of NSW Court no less than eighteen (maybe 21) times because of Progressive Activist Caring and Sharing Expert Psychiarist's and Social Justice Activists Experts and Hangers On like Dr XXXXX.
The Supreme Court of NSW is, in my opinion and based on my experience, an honest up front joint, no judge or staff member I had dealings with left me with anything to be desired.
The problems I had with Justice in NSW was with the self appointed hangers on,the "Social Justice" Bludgers (Pimps) and Parasites, the XXXXX Collective Co Operative, the 'We know what's best for you" Tax payer funded Bludgers, the "Clergy" NSW Legal Aid "Progressive" Gate Keepers, and their assorted tax dollar drip feeding hangers on, ever willing to fight the good fight on behalf of "the revolution" all funded by the NSW Tax Payer.
The Defendant in my case,was fully funded by the NSW State Government and its numerous tax payer funded, collective co operative, affirmative action, social justice, equality now, all cultures beliefs religions actions behaviours are equal,Blah Blah Blah Blah Departments.
I was blessed by been represented by a man who is no longer with us, he was a fighter he had been dealt the shit end of the stick at age 14 and despite this refused to give up on life he went on to become a successful Lawyer despite having too many clients like me who could more often than not pay him for his services.
He is no longer with us, he passed away, way to soon,as a consequence of the events that befell him at age 14.
He smoked he swore he had a beautiful wife and three children and at times was a total befuddlement to me, but mostly he was a source of inspiration, knowledge and wisdom, along with the four Barristers that he engaged on my behalf, two of whom went on to become Judges of the NSW Supreme Court and another an Australian Federal Court Judge.
Thankfully for me I am still with us, ok ok enough of your applause.
My advice (for what its worth) for anyone up against an "Expert Psychiarist" like the NSW Government Funded Dr XXXXXXX, ask yourself how important is the success of your case?
What is the worst outcome if you do not succeed ?
In Australia its best to NOT rely on Police or deal with the Legal System unless you have no alternative, Australia,despite its Justice public relations bull shit spin, for the average Anglo Saxon White Male / Female Heterosexual Employed Australian, I would never recommend engaging the Legal system, unless you are arrested stay away from it, it is NOT a Justice system it is a SOCIAL Justice system, a Progressive Left Ideological System and as such should be avoided at all costs unless compelled to do so.
In my case it was a life,that, like all lives could only be lived once, I was the ONLY one, who, if prepared to fight with everything available to me ,that,that life had the best opportunity available to LIVE as all AUSTRALIANS have a GOD GIVEN right to do so,in spite of the carers and sharers and social justice PIMPS demands.
THAT LIFE WON ..........He / She is living a Life in spite of the PROVEN Wicked Vicious Deliberate Lies and Fabrications of the Progressive Social Justice, Collective Co Operative, All Cultures Beliefs are Equal Taxpayer Funded "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXX and His / Her / Its Social Justice Groupies down at Legal Aid.
NOTHING IN MY EXPERIENCE ALLUDED TO ABOVE INVOLVED ANY PROFESSIONAL OR LEGAL PARTICIPATION BY THOSE WHO ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE FOLLOWING REPORT
FOUND AT http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/psychologists-reports-on-criminals-are-too-similar-judge-claims/story-fni0cx4q-1226783407314
Psychologists' reports on criminals are too similar Judge claims
Exclusive The Sunday Telegraph
December 15,2013
A JUDGE has criticised one of the state's prominent psychologists saying his reports on criminals are "virtually identical" with no explanation to back up his conclusions.
District Court Judge Peter Berman SC made the stinging assessment of Dr John Jacmon's "ability to assist the court" on multiple occasions when the psychologist submitted reports detailing the mental afflictions suffered by crooks being sentenced in his court.
Dr Jacmon told The Sunday Telegraph no other judges had a problem with his work and that many offenders he dealt with suffered from the same condition.
He said he wouldn't be changing his methods "just because one judge finds a problem".
The doctor has written reports for offenders sentenced by Judge Berman including a cocaine courier, two kidnappers and an appeal by Simon Munroe who killed a 15-year-old by injecting her with heroin.
Psychologists are often hired by lawyers to give evidence of subjective features, including mental conditions, to help explain a criminal's behaviour.
The report may impact the severity of the criminal's sentence or could see them recommended for medical treatment instead of jail.
According to Judge Berman, Dr Jacmon's reports are mostly identical in saying the offenders suffered from "impaired judgment" because they didn't consider the consequences of their actions.
On October 4, Judge Berman told a hearing: "Almost every report of his I have ever read suggests that 'the offender's actions ... indicated markedly diminished capacity for judgment because there appeared to be little thought given to the consequences'.
"The second problem with Dr Jacmon's report is that there is little or no explanation as to how he has drawn conclusions," the judge told the court.
Dr Jacmon told The Sunday Telegraph his reports averaged "30-40 pages" and his findings were all backed by evidence.
He said several conditions were common to many offenders.
"If a person has got the same disorder (as someone else) I can't say that in any other way - If they've got depression, they've got depression," he said. "It's probably because (Judge Berman) sees a lot of my reports - I'm very popular around town.
"I've had no other problems from other judges ... you can't please everyone," he said.
Prominent psychologist Tim Watson-Munro said it was likely the judge was matching the expectations of the community by setting a high bar for what mitigating factors should be accepted when sentencing criminals.
"We are in a time when the community is very cynical about sentencing," he said.
On December 10, 2010, Judge Berman opened the possibility of being disqualified from hearing a sentencing because he was critical of Dr Jacmon's reports.
He told the court: "every single" report by Dr Jacmon said the offenders' actions featured "impaired judgment" with "little thought given to the consequences".
"One wonders how Dr Jacmon would treat any offending behaviour by an individual ... where there is a risk of being detected," he told another hearing in November 2008.
"Dr Jacmon seems to be saying that anyone who commits a crime has impaired judgment because they might get caught," he told a September 2009 hearing for two kidnappers.
"I do not accept that opinion at all. Many offenders adopt a completely rational thought process."
In a 2008 case where Simon Munroe killed a teen girl with heroin, Dr Jacmon submitted Munroe took drugs to ease the stress from being sexually assaulted.
Judge Berman told the court the doctor's submission had no relevance given Munroe was being sentenced for killing a 15-year-old girl with heroin, not drug supply.
Judge Berman declined to comment.
NEWS
These "experts" are,in far too many cases, self appointed activists,social change merchants / agents, who will write reports conducive to whatever outcome they deem suitable to the case and their progressive social agenda.
In my case the "social change progressive" was outed in the witness box under cross examination by my Barrister, who elicited admissions, among many others of
Barrister XXXXXX
Question :
'is it true that at the time of writing and completing this report relied upon by the defendant, sworn and written by you and submitted to the court as an affidavit you had yet to meet or interview XXXXX, the subject of this report contained in the affidavit' ? "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXX
Answer : Yes
There was much much more damning testimony under oath, however it is too difficult to write here without revealing identities of plaintiff deponents.
I have not and at this time will not seek a lifting of a 'Closed Court" order so as to enable public access to the NSW Supreme Court proceedings initiated by myself.
The defendants "Expert Psychiarist" shortly after this admission under oath of the Supreme Court of NSW, was the Camera Hogging Boastful Star Witness,informant,of an Australian National Current Affairs program, alleging all sorts of "wrongs" against the NSW Health Commission regarding the funding and other "goings on" of an XXXXXX program for youths and children. Viewers of the story were outraged, and rightly so, after listening to the expert allegations of the caring and sharing Dr XXXXXXXX .
Approximately a week later the subjects of the caring and sharing Dr XXXXXXX damning allegations were answered one by one by the NSW Health Commission on the same National Current Affairs program.
During the refutations of the "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXXX by the NSW Health Commissions representative, it was revealed that the "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXXX bank account was in fact the real victim of the due diligence of the NSW Health Commission and that the "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXXX "victims" were in fact better off, free of the input,caring and sharing of "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXXX "
The allegations of "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXXX "were refuted by the representative in their entirety, the National Current Affairs program accepted those refutations as been the truth.
At the time of my commencing proceedings as a plaintiff in my matter the "Expert Psychiarist Dr XXXXX" was well known in legal circles as "Liar for Hire" Mr Mrs Miss Ms Dr XXXXX aka. Liar for Hire, was an inhabitant of what is known a "Red Square" a part of Sydney's XXXXXX Street Professional, Medical and Legal Hub.
During the course of my litigation (over 8 years in the Supreme Court of NSW) I was threatened / intimidated by the "Expert Psychiarist Dr XXXXX" repeated use of whoever the Supreme Court Judge listed to hear my matter was,first name been used over and over during the course of our discussions and suggestions that J.XXXXXX and that "Expert Psychiarist Dr XXXXX" and J.XXXXXX had by coincidence recently attended a BBQ at the home of another J. XXXXX who had heard interlocutory proceedings in my litigation.
This intimidation was not confined to "Expert Psychiarist Dr XXXXX" it was on one occasion used by the head of the XXXXXX mediation / counselling service.
I was told that my action had no merit in THEIR opinion regardless of my sworn testimony under oath and that same testimony surviving cross examination by NSW Government appointed and tax payer funded lawyers, and as such should not be considered by the Supreme Court of NSW, and that I should reconsider the errors of my ways.
The various Judges of the Supreme Court of NSW who heard from the first day of hearing my various motions accepted my evidence and that of the NSW Supreme Court appointed expert witness and others who gave testimony on my behalf, not only in the first instance in a Court of a different jurisdiction, but in the first and subsequent hearings of 18 or was it 21? appearances over 8 plus years in the NSW Supreme Court.
Despite my never having a Justice of the Supreme Court of NSW ruling against me,I was forced to appear in the Supreme Court of NSW Court no less than eighteen (maybe 21) times because of Progressive Activist Caring and Sharing Expert Psychiarist's and Social Justice Activists Experts and Hangers On like Dr XXXXX.
The Supreme Court of NSW is, in my opinion and based on my experience, an honest up front joint, no judge or staff member I had dealings with left me with anything to be desired.
The problems I had with Justice in NSW was with the self appointed hangers on,the "Social Justice" Bludgers (Pimps) and Parasites, the XXXXX Collective Co Operative, the 'We know what's best for you" Tax payer funded Bludgers, the "Clergy" NSW Legal Aid "Progressive" Gate Keepers, and their assorted tax dollar drip feeding hangers on, ever willing to fight the good fight on behalf of "the revolution" all funded by the NSW Tax Payer.
The Defendant in my case,was fully funded by the NSW State Government and its numerous tax payer funded, collective co operative, affirmative action, social justice, equality now, all cultures beliefs religions actions behaviours are equal,Blah Blah Blah Blah Departments.
I was blessed by been represented by a man who is no longer with us, he was a fighter he had been dealt the shit end of the stick at age 14 and despite this refused to give up on life he went on to become a successful Lawyer despite having too many clients like me who could more often than not pay him for his services.
He is no longer with us, he passed away, way to soon,as a consequence of the events that befell him at age 14.
He smoked he swore he had a beautiful wife and three children and at times was a total befuddlement to me, but mostly he was a source of inspiration, knowledge and wisdom, along with the four Barristers that he engaged on my behalf, two of whom went on to become Judges of the NSW Supreme Court and another an Australian Federal Court Judge.
Thankfully for me I am still with us, ok ok enough of your applause.
My advice (for what its worth) for anyone up against an "Expert Psychiarist" like the NSW Government Funded Dr XXXXXXX, ask yourself how important is the success of your case?
What is the worst outcome if you do not succeed ?
In Australia its best to NOT rely on Police or deal with the Legal System unless you have no alternative, Australia,despite its Justice public relations bull shit spin, for the average Anglo Saxon White Male / Female Heterosexual Employed Australian, I would never recommend engaging the Legal system, unless you are arrested stay away from it, it is NOT a Justice system it is a SOCIAL Justice system, a Progressive Left Ideological System and as such should be avoided at all costs unless compelled to do so.
In my case it was a life,that, like all lives could only be lived once, I was the ONLY one, who, if prepared to fight with everything available to me ,that,that life had the best opportunity available to LIVE as all AUSTRALIANS have a GOD GIVEN right to do so,in spite of the carers and sharers and social justice PIMPS demands.
THAT LIFE WON ..........He / She is living a Life in spite of the PROVEN Wicked Vicious Deliberate Lies and Fabrications of the Progressive Social Justice, Collective Co Operative, All Cultures Beliefs are Equal Taxpayer Funded "Expert Psychiarist" Dr XXXXXXX and His / Her / Its Social Justice Groupies down at Legal Aid.
NOTHING IN MY EXPERIENCE ALLUDED TO ABOVE INVOLVED ANY PROFESSIONAL OR LEGAL PARTICIPATION BY THOSE WHO ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE FOLLOWING REPORT
FOUND AT http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/psychologists-reports-on-criminals-are-too-similar-judge-claims/story-fni0cx4q-1226783407314
Psychologists' reports on criminals are too similar Judge claims
Exclusive The Sunday Telegraph
December 15,2013
A JUDGE has criticised one of the state's prominent psychologists saying his reports on criminals are "virtually identical" with no explanation to back up his conclusions.
District Court Judge Peter Berman SC made the stinging assessment of Dr John Jacmon's "ability to assist the court" on multiple occasions when the psychologist submitted reports detailing the mental afflictions suffered by crooks being sentenced in his court.
Dr Jacmon told The Sunday Telegraph no other judges had a problem with his work and that many offenders he dealt with suffered from the same condition.
He said he wouldn't be changing his methods "just because one judge finds a problem".
The doctor has written reports for offenders sentenced by Judge Berman including a cocaine courier, two kidnappers and an appeal by Simon Munroe who killed a 15-year-old by injecting her with heroin.
Psychologists are often hired by lawyers to give evidence of subjective features, including mental conditions, to help explain a criminal's behaviour.
The report may impact the severity of the criminal's sentence or could see them recommended for medical treatment instead of jail.
According to Judge Berman, Dr Jacmon's reports are mostly identical in saying the offenders suffered from "impaired judgment" because they didn't consider the consequences of their actions.
On October 4, Judge Berman told a hearing: "Almost every report of his I have ever read suggests that 'the offender's actions ... indicated markedly diminished capacity for judgment because there appeared to be little thought given to the consequences'.
"The second problem with Dr Jacmon's report is that there is little or no explanation as to how he has drawn conclusions," the judge told the court.
Dr Jacmon told The Sunday Telegraph his reports averaged "30-40 pages" and his findings were all backed by evidence.
He said several conditions were common to many offenders.
"If a person has got the same disorder (as someone else) I can't say that in any other way - If they've got depression, they've got depression," he said. "It's probably because (Judge Berman) sees a lot of my reports - I'm very popular around town.
"I've had no other problems from other judges ... you can't please everyone," he said.
Prominent psychologist Tim Watson-Munro said it was likely the judge was matching the expectations of the community by setting a high bar for what mitigating factors should be accepted when sentencing criminals.
"We are in a time when the community is very cynical about sentencing," he said.
On December 10, 2010, Judge Berman opened the possibility of being disqualified from hearing a sentencing because he was critical of Dr Jacmon's reports.
He told the court: "every single" report by Dr Jacmon said the offenders' actions featured "impaired judgment" with "little thought given to the consequences".
"One wonders how Dr Jacmon would treat any offending behaviour by an individual ... where there is a risk of being detected," he told another hearing in November 2008.
"Dr Jacmon seems to be saying that anyone who commits a crime has impaired judgment because they might get caught," he told a September 2009 hearing for two kidnappers.
"I do not accept that opinion at all. Many offenders adopt a completely rational thought process."
In a 2008 case where Simon Munroe killed a teen girl with heroin, Dr Jacmon submitted Munroe took drugs to ease the stress from being sexually assaulted.
Judge Berman told the court the doctor's submission had no relevance given Munroe was being sentenced for killing a 15-year-old girl with heroin, not drug supply.
Judge Berman declined to comment.
NEWS
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)