Alan Jones & Tim Blair discuss the rabble that is the “Gillard Government”
A blog revealing the horrors of Islam,International Socialism,the misery these two evils are inflicting upon the free the world,and those it has already enslaved,along with various articles revealing the attacks from within upon the western Judeo Christian ethic by those we entrusted to preserve it. Videos and Pictures of many varied subjects from around the world, along with some jokes of mine and any funny ones you want to send me.
Alan Jones & Tim Blair discuss the rabble that is the “Gillard Government”
Latest Update
Official Police Report of Hoxton Park High School Muslim Riot and aftermath
3 3 2011 Hoxton Park High School Riot 649258-police-report
Led by the so-called "Godfather" of the NSW Labor right, Senator Don Farrell, the trio gave voice to backbench fears over the Greens' hold on the Gillard Government.
The right-wing delegation of Senator Farrell, and senior senators Steve Hutchins and John Hogg met the PM at 11.30am yesterday after the Greens claimed to have Government backing for a Bill to pave the way for gay marriage and legal euthanasia.
It is believed the PM said she had no knowledge of it and gave a commitment she would not back legal euthanasia.They had also confronted Treasurer Wayne Swan, who also claimed to be in the dark.
Senate Labor leader Chris Evans was later forced to apologise to a caucus of Labor senators at a 3pm meeting over what they claimed was a return to the Rudd-style lack of consultation and failure of government process.
The Greens had ambushed the Government by quietly introducing amendments to its own private member's Bill late on Tuesday night.
The amendment made the Bill far more radical and turned a "machinery" Bill into one that would pave the way for the territories to allow legal euthanasia and gay marriage by limiting the Commonwealth's ability to overturn territory legislation.
Anger was directed at former Labor leader Simon Crean, who briefed the ALP Caucus on the territories Bill on Tuesday. "There is a view around that, at best, Crean didn't explain the Bill and we've been misled," one Labor MP said. "Either that or it was a giant stuff up."
Mr Crean, however, defended his position, saying: "The position that I took to Caucus was the same position as supported by the party in 2006."
Ms Gillard now faces a possible breakout of factional war with right-wing MPs accusing Labor left MPs - who support gay marriage and euthanasia - of conspiring with the Greens to deceive the Government. The issue was later resolved when the PM intervened to ensure Labor would vote with the Coalition in the Senate to delay the Bill by referring it to a committee.
MPs are also angry that the PM's decision to introduce a carbon tax was not taken to the caucus.
Others told The Daily Telegraph they were receiving "virulent" emails complaining of a Labor "sell out" to the Greens, who combined with Ms Gillard to unveil the climate change pact.
And Last week Deputy Prime Minister Bob Brown announced the CO 2 TAX, the Labor Green TAX on EVERYTHING.
Muslim Brotherhood member quizzed over Auburn shooting
Geoff Chambers
The Daily Telegraph
March 03, 2011 12:00AM
A SENIOR member of the Muslim Brotherhood Movement gang has been quizzed by police after a man was shot in the neck.
Police are investigating whether the Auburn shooting on Tuesday night is linked to gang rivalries in Sydney's southwest.
Detectives interviewed two men allegedly in a car with the victim, 21, about 9.40pm.
As the car pulled into Pine Rd, an argument erupted between the men and a group standing on the road.
"We have been given different version of events," Detective Inspector White said.
Shots were fired with one grazing the victim's neck. Shots also went into a house.
and,
Media Release
Menzies House, an independent grassroots website for centre right political activists, today announced the launch of http://www.StopGillardsCarbonTax.com, an online petition and information resource opposing the recent proposal to implement a carbon tax as a transition to an Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).
If enacted, it is estimated that this tax hike will cost the average Australian household a staggering extra $300 a year in electricity bills, as with further sharp increases in the costs of goods and services.
“This proposal is an economically damaging grab for cash by a desperate government and will lead to the very same ETS rejected by the Australian people.” said Timothy Andrews, Managing Editor of Menzies House.“It will hurt businesses, hurt families, and seriously harm the Australian economy – at a time Australian Families can least afford it. With recent increases in the cost of living already hitting Australian households, this is a tax hike Australia just can not afford.”
The Editor-in-Chief of Menzies House, John Humphreys, has previously written about revenue-neutral carbon tax, but opposes the current proposal
“A moderate carbon tax, with offsetting tax cuts, would be the least harmful policy for combating climate change” said Mr. Humphreys. “However, the current policy fails because it does not provide the offsetting tax cuts, and so it will increase the size of government and hurt the economy. It is also worrying that the government seems intent on switching to an emissions trading system, which is an unnecessarily complicated and inefficient response to climate change." Madame Gillard
John Humphreys
Email: editor@menzieshouse.com.au
Mobile: 0404 044 561
Timothy Andrews
Email: tandrews@menzieshouse.com.au
Australian’s please register here to show your support for freedom. This is a TAX on everything.
Most Australians concerned by Muslims
March 01, 2011
NEARLY six in 10 Australians are concerned about the number of Muslim people in Australia, according to a new poll.
A poll by Essential Media Communications found 57 per cent of people were "very concerned" or "somewhat concerned" about the number of Muslims in Australia.
The poll conducted in the past week, found four in 10 people said they believed Muslims made up more than 5 per cent of the population, when in fact the figure was 1.7 per cent, according to the report.
When presented with the actual figures, the number of people who said they were concerned declined.
"very concerned" or "somewhat concerned" about the number of Muslims in Australia.Gee why? maybe they have friends in Sweeden.
THE ECO-CON THAT KEEPS ON TAKING
Nancy Levant
June 13, 2005
NewsWithViews.com
Let’s imagine that we all live the Agenda 21 way.
We own no land. We have no guns. We have no vote. Our children are the property of a global government taught by NGO agents called Career Certification Specialists, and God is outlawed and a thing of the past.
We are assigned to employers who are assigned to our settlement territories. There is no local government and there are no counties or cities. We are barred from large forests, natural fresh waters, and beachfront properties, which are all owned by businesses and used, tax free, by their families and friends.
Enemies of the People,Australian Socialist, Union funded, Labor / Green Loon / “Independent” minority coalition federal government.
The population of what was once American people, is now squeezed into settlement communities in the center of the country. The wealthy live in mega-mansions, and conservation easements, corridors, and buffer zones separate us from them. The mountains and large forested areas of the country are strictly off limits to Mid-North American people (M-NAPs), and corporate government owns all land and watershed systems.
We drive less and less as government security and the Real ID denies more and more driver’s licenses for more and more reasons. The cut-off age for driver’s licenses is lowered to 60 and the driving age is raised to following compulsory military service, but all driving is restricted to 25 miles a week. Then 20. Then 15, and so forth.
Employers send trams to pick us up for work and drop us off. That will come out of our paychecks, but enforced non-pollution is just that – enforced.
Via nano-technology and widespread RFID use, all pretense of privacy will leave our imaginations, and we become a highly managed species to find, punish, eavesdrop upon, and watch (Sub-dermal chipping was tested on grazing animals, then dogs, and chipping centers are now open for business in Florida and being tested on senior citizens. Children will be next under the guise of security/anti-kidnapping technology, and then banking rights will require chipping).
As we become ill more frequently, living in such close and small quarters, we are given the medical care that the government deems appropriate, and NGO governing boards determine the definition of human quality of life. Remember that human life is to be reduced by 40-75% depending upon which U.N. conservation partners you listen to.
At least 50% of the North American continent is off limits to Homo Sapiens. Between the government and large land trusts, more than half of American land is already in their hands.
Species of large mammals are repopulated. Wolves and cougars, mountain lions and bears guard the wilderness areas to ensure that people keep away. All wilderness areas are now the private property of corporate government. Watch for fencing.
International conglomerations, which are partnered with international conservation/land trusts, and all partnered with the United Nations, are the holders and keepers of land stolen by complex business schemes. Those conglomerations and their partnerships, which “control” and “aid” and “create” the conservation strategy of all life on Earth and are the self-proclaimed custodians of all living ecosystems, are historically, and remain the largest polluters on Earth. Their leadership and their partners are all multi-millionaires and billionaires.
All children, following 10-12 years of indoctrination, are soldiers. All women are rated for limited reproductive rights and licenses will be issued for reproductive rights. The mentally or physically damaged are eliminated. All income is reduced to under 20K per year, and American suburbia is leveled and rebuilt into business and trade corridors.
The Mexican and Canadian borders are dissolved. Martial law is implemented to keep the peace and to put down all attempted uprisings. Troublemakers will be killed or removed from the general population and placed into determent camps, which are currently readied and staffed.
The sick, infirmed, and the children of troublemakers will become wards of the state. Some will be re-engineered and some will be put down.
Now, why would all this happen to the human population? Why would big business and the largest banks in the world ever conceive of such a plan? Why, to protect nature, of course! That is what the U.N. has declared – and the World Bank and the World Trade Organization and the American government. And if you believe that, I’ve got some swampland to sell you, located in a U.N. Biosphere Reserve, which is surrounded by a conservation easement, which is surrounded by a buffer zone (the politically correct term for de-militarized zone) in deed-restricted Florida, which is actually owned by the corporation of Florida, under the CEO Governor-General.
Just keep telling yourselves – we elected them – we elected them.
Tout va Très Bien Madame la Multiculturalisma
From Sultan Knish
Posted: 26 Feb 2011 06:49 PM PST
France's President Sarkozy has stated that multiculturalism has failed, insisting that Muslim immigrants merge into the "national community". German President Angela Merkel made virtuallythe same statement earlier at her party's convention. British PM David Cameron went further saying that Islamism had taken root because multiculturalism had diminished a collective English identity. All three leaders are conservatives and language like this has been greeted with applause by their base. But there is really very little to cheer here.
Announcing the failure of multiculturalism in Europe of 2011 is as relevant a disclosure as the comic French song, Tout Va Très Bien, Madame La Marquise, in which the groom informs her ladyship that her husband had committed suicide after losing his money and burned down the estate, by telling her that everything was alright except for a minor mishap with her horse. Multiculturalism may be the post-national left's favorite nag, but the failure here is much greater. It is mass migration from the Muslim world that is the problem, and any policy that only addresses the consequences, rather than the cause, is bound to be a failure.
Of the three leaders, Cameron was the only to lay out something close to a policy. But his muscular rhetoric sounds suspiciously like the pre-election Sarkozy. And conservative British pols have developed a habit of talking tough about Islam one minute, and pandering to it shamelessly for votes on the other. Before becoming Prime Minister, Cameron went to live with a Muslim family and announced that, "Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around."
Has Cameron suddenly realized that the extended Muslim family with its rugs and hospitality masks less appetizing cultural problems, particularlywhen it comes to the treatment of women, or is he trying to stay ahead of a public backlash. Sarkozy certainly is. His popularity is low. Meanwhile LePen's daughter is behind a revived party, without her father's Nazi sympathies and anti-semitism, that may take away enough votes to make a difference. Merkel is also unpopular and needs a red meat issue that will distract the voters from Greece and Portugal. And so for all that European leaders are talking about the threat of Islamic separatism, and the Palestinization of Muslim communities with their No Go zones, honor killings and riots, they are still speaking the language of integration.
Integration. Process the millions of Muslims through British, Germany and French schools and make sure that they know the national language, rather than the urban patois that has become the lingua franca of a changing Europe, showing up in rap albums and TV shows. Teach them how wonderfully tolerant we are, bridge the gap by celebrating their culture, and maybe even making room for a little Sharia law on the side. Tie the knot and there'll be a happy integrated nation, which marries the Middle Eastern values of hospitality and the British values of not beheading your daughter.
The problem with this new anthem of 'Tout va Très Bien Madame la Multiculturalisma' is that multiculturalism isn't the problem, it's the symptom. The British, French and German systems haven't failed, they have had a chance of success. It would have been possible to integrate a few thousand Muslims per country, but not a few million. Certainly not people who have no definition of integration, and whose cultural and religious assumptions are so far apart that they cannot integrate without losing their identity.
But even this need not have been a complete and absolute disaster. 3 million Nepalese might have made their own separate communities, as they have in towns such as Reading, without it leading to a civil war. The natives would have complained of the smells, the foreign languages and the strange signs. Of entire English towns in the hands of strangers. And it would have ended at that. But Muslims are a special case for three unfortunate reasons.
First, they hold an enduring grievance toward Europe for everything over the last 1000 years. Considering the troubles in Northern Ireland between peoples far more closely related by culture and blood, who in their right mind thought that it would be a good idea to import millions of foreigners who still resent the loss of Spain, the Crusades and colonial governments with nearly equal ferocity, and imagined that it would all go smoothly.
Second, their culture is tightly integrated with their religion, and their religion has a long history of expanding through conquest. A history both ancient and recent. It took enormous arrogance to import millions of members whose civilization still employs violence as a religiously sanctioned tool for promoting the faith, and then act as if they could be integrated with a good lesson plan.
Third, many Muslim countries have enormous wealth and influence, and have used it to promote Islamism and tear down the defenses of Western nations. Imagine if the Soviet Union had possessed enormous oil wealth or if Japan in the 80's had decided to use its wealth to aggressively promote a cultural takeover. That is what we are dealing with here.
All this talk of integrating Muslims disregards them as a civilization, and treats them as if they were delinquents. Cameron's talk of youth falling into extremism suggests that he thinks of them as if they were children from a broken home falling through the cracks of the system and shooting up heroin on council estates, rather than young men acting in accord with the values of their own religion.
The Muslim terrorists of Europe are neither impoverished nor marginalized. They are doctors, architects and university students who have taken the full benefit of what the countries have to offer them, and gone to war to win it all. They are brats acting out, but soldiers engaging in a war of conquest. A simple fact that all the integration prattle obscures.
The difference between the so-called extremists and the moderates, is that the extremists want to conquer Europe by force, and the moderates through demographics and culture. The extremists want to blow up Europe. The moderates want to integrate it. And their lesson plans have gotten much further into the European, Canadian, Australian and American child-- than the lesson plans of the Western integrators have into the Muslim child.
Cameron has rightly identified a portion of the problem. But his solution is asinine. You do not create a vigorous culture worthy of respect by passing a law and making it so. A culture that merits respect can only be created by the measure of its accomplishments. The decline of English culture parallels the physical recession of the nation, its power, its industry and its achievements. (And that is a fair warning for America, which is headed down the same path at a slower pace.) A lesson plan on King Alfred the Great, will not make England great, and will not earn Muslim respect, let alone their integration. Most nations have their own grand histories and their own tales. But unless they still have greatness within them, these are nothing but matters of trivia.
Talk all you want of greatness, but great nations colonize, they are not colonized. All a UK Muslim needs to do in order to gauge where the future lies is look at the native birth rate, at the Muslim birth rate and at the immigration statistics. And then he can safely relegate King Alfred the Great, Lord Nelson and Winston Churchill to the realm of obscure trivia from a vanishing nation. After all Byzantium too was great in its time, but now it's a giant Muslim marketplace.
The Middle East was once the cradle of civilization, today it is a heap of dirt with a smattering of oil, olive groves and vast dirty slum carrying the names of once legendary cities. The region was full of cultures and civilizations that were once great, before being trodden under the boots of maddened Bedouin fanatics. Today only two, the Jews and the Persians, exist as independent nations. And it would not take all that long to turn Europe into the new Middle East.
The integrators imagine that they can halt that process with a reading of 'The Charge of the Light Brigade' or by banning the burqa, but the tide of history is not turned so easily as that. The great men of England's own history could tell Cameron that. It is not history that makes nations great, but the way in which they carry on that history into the present. The way in which they realize that history in the present day.
Say what you will about Muslims, but they are realizing their history in Europe today. While they reenact the old battles, their foes are tempting them with social services funding. European governments want Muslims to join their republican secular states. Muslims want Europeans to join their caliphate. And it is not difficult to see who will that particular contest if things go on as they are.
Reporting the failure of multiculturalism is a touch of Tout Va Très Bien, Madame La Marquise by the integrators who are comically understating the scope and the nature of the problem. Europe's problem is not multiculturalism, but that it has been invaded and it has forgotten how to fight back.
“Europe's problem is not multiculturalism, but that it has been invaded and it has forgotten how to fight back”
So what’s new? see WW2.
The candidate, a 'radical cult' and $6m squandered on the college that never was
Natalie O'Brien and Alicia Wood
Daily Telegraph
February 27, 2011
THE family of Bankstown Liberal candidate Bill Chahine was involved in a controversial land deal with a school linked to a ''radical cult'' that ended up costing taxpayers almost $6 million dollars in compensation.
When the state government sold the surplus land in 2006, it thought it was selling to a residential developer, Gardenview Apartments. The director of the company at the time was Mr Chahine's father, Albert Chahine, and the Chahine family plumbing company, ABC Plumbing Services, was the ultimate holding company and shareholder. Bill Chahine is now a director and shareholder of the family's plumbing company.
Documents obtained by The Sun-Herald show that the NSW government eventually paid more than $10 million to buy back the surplus chunk of the Bass Hill school site, which had been sold to an Islamic college after it was secured by tender by the Chahine family companies for $4.4 million.
The state government has always refused to reveal how much it paid to claw back the property.
MEMO!!! Australian Liberal Party: When you lay down with DOGS you wake with Muslims and Multiculturalism.
A political storm erupted when it was revealed that Al Amanah College - run by the Islamic Charity Projects Association, which is linked to the controversial Al-Ahbash group - was the real owner of the site and planned to build an Islamic school for 1200 students.
The Australian National Imams Council, which represents almost 100 Imams around the country, has warned that the Al-Ahbash is a ''radical cult'' with ''sectarian fringe views''. Al-Ahbash has denied these claims.
A few weeks before the settlement of the school land, all shares in Gardenview were sold to Al Amanah, which reappointed directors. Gardenview then asked the government to register the land in the name of Al Amanah.
But following a community outcry about the proposed new Islamic school, the NSW opposition fought against the project.
While the school was initially rejected by Bankstown Council, it was later given the green light by the NSW Land and Environment Court.
The Department of Education then moved to compulsorily acquire the property on Johnston Road in Bass Hill, with the Valuer-General last year putting the market value of the land at $8,550,000, plus $1,479.333.51 for ''disturbance''. A total of $10,029,333.51 was paid on May 21 last year to the Al Amanah College as compensation.
Bill Chahine told The Sun-Herald yesterday: ''We tendered, I mean Albert tendered for the land, and due to contamination of the land we decided to sell our tender.'' A spokeswoman for Mr Chahine also said that it was the state government that had made a ''woeful'' deal and the Labor Party were trying to sling mud at him because of his early involvement. ''The government could have rejected the tender,'' she said.
A spokeswoman for the Liberal Party said there was ''a vicious smear campaign under way by Labor because it fears its control over south-west Sydney is being challenged''.
''The community has had enough of being taken for granted by Labor and its power-brokers like Eddie Obeid,'' she said.
The battle for Bankstown has been heating up, and there is no love lost between candidates Tania Mihailuk, Rebecca Kay and Mr Chahine.
Ms Mihailuk, the ALP candidate, is accused of trying to influence Ms Kay's hockey club to take her off promotional material, and Liberal supporters have allegedly sent Ms Kay threatening mail. One email sent to Ms Kay was signed by Liberal4btown, and said : ''I wouldn't talk much coming from a family that sells drugs just watch what you say when you speak or write to the media.''
The mail refers to Ms Kay's in-laws, the Darwiche family, who are known to police but have not been charged with any drug offences.
Militants attack southern Russia city
February 26, 2011 9:11PM
UP to a dozen militants have staged a daring attack on the capital of a southern Russian republic popular with downhill skiers and budget tourists, news reports reveal.
The overnight attack on Kabardino-Balkaria came a week after three Moscow tourists were gunned down in the area while travelling to the Elbrus mountain resort, which is one of Russia's most popular winter tourist destinations.
No one was reported killed in Friday night's strike on the republic's capital Nalchik, which witnessed grenades tossed at a local Federal Security Service (FSB) building and police posts come under repeated machine gun fire.
But the incident prompted a late night telephone conversation between President Dmitry Medvedev and FSB chief Alexander Bortnikov, the Kremlin said.
Highlighting the Kremlin's concern over the latest incident, news reports said that Medvedev's North Caucasus envoy Alexander Khloponin had taken personal charge of the investigation.
The Nalchik attack culminates a restless month in a region that until now has been largely able to avoid the deadly violence raging in nearby mostly Muslim republics such as Ingushetia and Dagestan.
Kabardino-Balkaria has been a popular destination with both skiers and mountain climbers, with its budget boosted by tourism revenues that continued to climb despite violence wrecking other parts of the Caucasus range.
But its ski slopes went empty on February 18 after two masked attackers stopped a minibus carrying six people on Friday evening and opened fire, killing three passengers instantly and wounding others.
A few hours later, an explosion targeted a ski lift in one of the Elbrus mountain resort areas. No one was reported hurt in that incident.
A message on Islamist website Islamdin.com linked to the militant group Caucasus Emirate said the tourists were killed for entering "the war zone".
Military officials initially claimed killing three militants responsible for attacking the tourists.
But subsequent reports said the suspected Islamists had escaped into the region's mountains, which Russian
forces have been pelting with artillery and aerial fire for much of the week.
Twelve paragraphs in total, with a headline of “Militants attack southern Russia city “,It’s not until the TENTH paragraph that the word Islamist is written WHY?
Why does the news agency,AFP,only want the reader to know the identity of the ASSASSINS to be known until the third last paragraph?
More of those CRAZY “Militants” and their hi jinks….
The announcement of the carbon tax is just another broken promise and Gillard didn’t even get the chance to be the first to announce her own backflip. Greens leader Bob Brown put out a press release praising her stunning hypocrisy before she had had the opportunity to inform the people of her own mind-numbing duplicity.
Then, backed by Brown and his deputy Christine Milne and her own Climate Change minister Greg Combet, with support from the two independents principally responsible for putting Labor in office, Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor, she sought to dismiss the stupendous hypocrisy of her position.
It was, even by the lowly standards we have come to expect from this Prime Minister, a farce. Bizarrely, she attempted to compare her betrayal of the Australian people with the spectacular career of Microsoft founder Bill Gates, saying Gates understood change and had ridden the information technology revolution to fortune.
“This is the time to be pricing carbon and dealing with the change to a clean energy future,” she said.
Even more fatuously, she then added: “This is the parliament the Australian people voted for - you are seeing it on display in front of you. And we have to get on with the job of pricing carbon.”
She went on to tell parliament that “the Australian people had voted for a carbon tax” at the 2010 election. This would be news to all.
As Opposition leader Tony Abbott made plain during Question Time, only one political leader went to the last election with a plan for a carbon tax and that was Brown.
Just one politician campaigned for the introduction of a carbon tax, Abbott said. Meanwhile, 149 members ruled out such a tax.
“When does one vote trump 149 votes?” Abbott, justifiably, asked.
If Gillard’s horizons extended beyond The Lodge to an examination of the global marketplace, she would understand that nations around the world are currently walking away from the restrictions of carbon taxes in an effort to resuscitate their economies.
Gillard’s arguments for introducing this massive impost on Australians are hollow.
She is wedded to the belief that climate change is induced by human activity - a view certainly held by some, but by no means all, scientists.
She believes scientific views should be determined by consensus - a view which would have isolated all those who have relied on scientific proofs to support their theories.
She believes that people must be bludgeoned by draconian taxes into changing their ways, but she cannot explain how highly taxed Australians will be able to compete with trading nations whose economies have not been hobbled by Green-Left politicians.
Gillard has introduced her new tax on the basis of policy developed by her climate change committee, the same Green-Left and independent MPs whose political careers depend upon Labor remaining in power.
The committee, which has held just four meetings since it was set up last September, replaced another brain bubble Gillard had in the lead-up to the last election: A Citizens Committee to decide climate policy.
But overlooked in this cynical effort to buy the votes of the Greens and independents is the reality that, without a global agreement on carbon taxes, whatever Australia does is absolutely meaningless.
Just being among the first nations to sabotage its own economy is not going to change the temperature of the Earth, as much as the Green-Left may wistfully cling to their hopey-changey culture.
Labor’s traditional voters should be aware that the bare minimum increase they will have in electricity prices alone in the first year of Gillard’s carbon tax is estimated to be between $300 and $500. That does not take into account the additional increases that will naturally be triggered when industry adds the cost of the tax to their inputs.
Gillard makes no apology for this, claiming there will be offsets and compensation payments. But why would anyone believe anything she says or, worse, promises, given her appalling record of saying one thing and doing another?
Whether it is Gillard or her predecessor Kevin Rudd, the current run of Labor governments has a disgraceful history when it comes to promises made on climate change.
Under Rudd, the “greatest moral challenge” of our time was dumped like a dead and stinking cat as soon as the Copenhagen Conference crumbled into insignificance.
It is apparent that Gillard learnt nothing from Rudd’s mistakes. Worse, she has permitted herself to become hostage to a handful of MPs whose views are not those of the majority of Australians, Labor or Liberal.
The Greens attract little more than a token vote and have just one MP on the floor of the House. The independents have, by betraying their conservative electorates, earned nothing but universal disdain, no matter what Oakeshott may feel about the “new paradigm”.
Gillard’s broken promises on a carbon tax are nothing short of grotesque but her intention to impose a new tax without consultation through an election, as John Howard did with the GST, is pure treachery.
Last week the Labor Party’s own review of the last election warned of the dangers of placing too much power in the hands of a few.
It showed yesterday that it has not heeded the advice of its own elders - to the detriment of all Australians.
Sydney's Occupied Territories erupt AGAIN in a display of spontaneous, Multicultural Diversity, as more of the Australian Labor Party's /Greens / Independents, "preferred citizens" weave their (Black) magic of Multiculturalism and Diversity at Granville High School.
What civilized society could not embrace this? ...Hmmmmmmmm maybe a society inhabited by those RASCISTS that the atheist, Welsh Marxist Immigrant, and now PM of Australia,Madame Julia Gillard has sworn to re educate.
These Multiculturalists need MORE of Australians TAXES so they can tell Australian’s how racist they are, well at least that is what Madame Gillard and her Union Financed / Labor / Green / Independent Minority Federal Government DEMANDS Australian's do.
“In addition to being a hybrid, Islam is wholly materialistic. The Quran takes on an almost fetish character, where the book itself is “sacred,” not the contents. The focus of prayer and the object of pilgrimage and veneration is a black rock. The rewards for dying in the cause of Allah are completely material — virgins, food, and sensual ambiance. Finally, Islam is the only religion where territorial sovereignty is more important than the inner spiritual sovereignty over men’s hearts. Mankind and territory are divided between the world of “submission” and the world of “warfare.” Whereas Judeo-Christian religions focus on the righteousness of individuals, the emphasis in Islam is the collective –the ummah.”
Allah is Dead – Why Islam is not a Religion
Allah Is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion'>Buy the Book Here
* Algeria
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Algeria
Current Advice Level: "Reconsider your need to travel"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (kidnapping) and Civil Unrest/Political Tension (ongoing protests). The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Uganda
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Uganda
Current Advice Level: "High degree of caution"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (possible terrorist attacks in February).The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Libya
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Libya
Current Advice Level: "High degree of caution"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: (unsettled security situation). The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Turkey
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Turkey
Current Advice Level: "High degree of caution"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (locations that may be subject to terrorist attack). The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Russia
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Russia
Current Advice Level: "High degree of caution"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (locations that may be subject to terrorist attack). The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Poland
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Poland
Current Advice Level: "Exercise caution"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (locations that may be subject to terrorist attack). The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Norway
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Norway
Current Advice Level: "Be alert to own security"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (locations that may be subject to terrorist attack). The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Moldova
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Moldova
Current Advice Level: "Be alert to own security"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (locations that may be subject to terrorist attack). The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Malta
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Malta
Current Advice Level: "Be alert to own security"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (locations that may be subject to terrorist attack). The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Lithuania
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Lithuania
Current Advice Level: "Be alert to own security"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (locations that may be subject to terrorist attack). The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Greece
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Greece
Current Advice Level: "Exercise caution"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (locations that may be subject to terrorist attack). The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Georgia
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Georgia
Current Advice Level: "High degree of caution"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (locations that may be subject to terrorist attack). The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Austria
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Austria
Current Advice Level: "Be alert to own security"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (locations that may be subject to terrorist attack). The overall level of the advice has not changed.
* Thailand
http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Thailand
Current Advice Level: "High degree of caution"
Change Summary:
This advice has been reviewed and reissued. It contains new information in the Summary and under Safety and Security: Terrorism (recent terrorist attacks and locations that may be subject to attack), Safety and Security: Civil Unrest/Political Tension (activation of Internal Security Act in seven districts of Bangkok) and Border Regions (ongoing border dispute between Thailand and Cambodia). The level of the advice for the area surrounding the Pra Viharn temple on the Thai-Cambodia border has increased to Reconsider your need to travel.
Tuesday, 15 February 2011
Muslim illegal entrant advocate comes clean and acknowledges former Australian PM John Howard STOPPED THE BOATS
How two groups of survivors and family react to the SAME tragedy.