NEW Australian PM Malcolm Turnbull
A "self centred, selfish individual. It has always been about you.”
An American, Australian ,Israeli, British "Judeo Christian Friendly " blog.
Anthropogenic Global Warming SCAM
Monday, September 14, 2015
Australian Liberal Party (Conservative) Leadership decided. Turnbull wins Party ballot.
Australian PM Tony Abbott loses Liberal Party (Conservative) leadership and Prime Ministership.
Leadership spill was instigated by the resignation of Left wing and Media poster boy Malcolm Turnbull, and subsequent press conferences outlining why he no longer is prepared to serve under Tony Abbott as Leader and PM.
Leadership spill was instigated by the resignation of Left wing and Media poster boy Malcolm Turnbull, and subsequent press conferences outlining why he no longer is prepared to serve under Tony Abbott as Leader and PM.
Leftist Media Pin Up Boy Malcolm Turnbull (aka. Prince of Darkness POD.)
Six and Eight Year Old Girls Sexual Organs Hacked and Mutilated in Muslim Religious Ceremony cut “down there” and “hurt (in the) bottom,”
Seven-year-old girl pictured herself as ‘princess in a garden’ to blank out pain of genital mutilation, court hears
The Daily Telegraph
Two women, 71 and 38, have pleaded not guilty on two counts
One is the girls’ mother. They face a maximum of 21 years
Both are members of a sect which hails from sub-continent
Seven-year-old ‘pictured herself as a princess’ to blank out pain
Mother told eldest daughter to keep what happened secret
TWO sisters revealed to police the secret practice of alleged female genital mutilation among a small Islamic sect in Wollongong and Sydney, a court has heard.
The girls, then aged six and eight, told police officers who interviewed them at their primary school that they had been cut “down there” and “hurt (in the) bottom,” during the secret ceremony called Khatna allegedly practised by the Shia sect Dawoodi Bohra on young girls.
The girls’ mother along with a retired nurse and a high-ranking member of the Dawoodi Bohra clergy are the first three people in NSW to stand trial for female genital mutilation.
It is alleged the girls’ mother, 38, who is called A2 to protect the girls’ identity arranged the procedure and was there when the nurse, 71, called KM, carried it out on her daughters in Wollongong and
Baulkham Hills in Sydney’s north west some time between October 2009 and August 2012.
Both women have pleaded not guilty to two counts of female genital mutilation which carries a maximum penalty of 21 years.
They have also pleaded not guilty to two back-up charges of assault occasioning actual bodily harm in company.
Sheik Shabbir Mohammedbhai Vaziri, 59, has pleaded not guilty to being an accessory after the fact to female genital mutilation.
Crown prosecutor Nanette Williams said police began investigating Dawoodi Bohra after receiving allegations that female genital mutilation was practised inside the group whose followers are mostly from western India and Pakistan.
Ms Williams said the police interviewed the sisters C1 and C2 at their school on August 29, 2012 where the pair allegedly explained the practise of “khatna”.
“C1 (the eldest) knew what Khatna was because it had happened to her. She was seven years old when she had her private parts cut,” Ms Williams said.
C1 told police she tried to picture herself being a princess in a garden to remain calm when she was laid down on a bed and received “a little cut down there.”
After police interviewed the girls their mother was called to pick them up, but while her vehicle was at the school it was bugged by police.
Ms Williams said as the mother drove the girls home she told her eldest daughter, “I told you this is a big secret never tell anyone.”
Ms Williams said the girls were soon after examined at The Children’s Hospital at Westmead but the doctor was unable to confirm or deny whether the girls had been circumcised.
It is alleged when police started asking in the community about female genital mutilation Vaziri advised people to tell officers that they did not believe in the practice.
Defence barrister for A2 and Vaziri Robert Sutherland SC said the procedure was a “ritualistic ceremony.”
“It did not involve any mutilation or injury to either child,” he said.
The eldest daughter, now 11, will give evidence tomorrow.
Labor Green Loons Favourite Killers control Australia's Beaches
Sharks: Dawn of new era as traditional safety warnings are outdated
Geoff Chambers
The Daily Telegraph
September 14, 2015
SURFERS are being put in deadly danger because shark safety messages peddled by government agencies do not apply to white pointers and can’t be easily accessed online.
The Daily Telegraph can reveal traditional safety messages about swimming at dusk and dawn and staying close to the beach are outdated.
North coast shark victims Paul Wilcox and Tadashi Nakahara were both attacked and killed by great whites near the beach in good conditions between 10am and 11am.
Ballina bodyboarder Matt Lee was lucky to survive after being attacked midmorning in similar conditions off Lighthouse Beach in July.
In stark contrast to the NSW Department of Primary Industries website, which has no mention of sharks on its home page and requires links to find its so-called “Sharksmart” information, the WA
government has a dedicated shark site, also called Sharksmart.
The WA page provides real-time updates on tagged shark locations, and photos of shark species instead of illustrations.
It also provides clear information on emergency response details and a fact/fiction checklist, which presents uncensored information on the threat posed by some shark species.
BALLINA ATTACK VICTIM WELCOMED HOME
SYDNEY PREPARES FOR SHARK SUMMER
One of the country’s most senior shark experts told The Daily Telegraph traditional safety protocols did not apply to white pointers. And while bull sharks were known to be near river mouths and to attack
humans, the behaviour of bronze whalers and tiger sharks could vary.
“It is impossible to predict. And every shark behaves differently and every coastline is different,” the expert said.
Matilda Hughes, part-owner of Avoca and Terrigal Learn to Surf, told The Daily Telegraph her business was hurt following a local attack last year.
The 20-year-old said accurate and updated shark education tips were crucial for both locals and tourists.
The DPI said it was looking at improving the NSW Sharksmart program and agreed it was an “important tool to protect beachgoers”.
SHARK ATTACK VICTIM LUCKY AFTER ‘FANNING MOMENT’
WATCH THE AMAZING MICK FANNING SHARK ATTACK VIDEO
Geoff Chambers
The Daily Telegraph
September 14, 2015
SURFERS are being put in deadly danger because shark safety messages peddled by government agencies do not apply to white pointers and can’t be easily accessed online.
The Daily Telegraph can reveal traditional safety messages about swimming at dusk and dawn and staying close to the beach are outdated.
North coast shark victims Paul Wilcox and Tadashi Nakahara were both attacked and killed by great whites near the beach in good conditions between 10am and 11am.
Ballina bodyboarder Matt Lee was lucky to survive after being attacked midmorning in similar conditions off Lighthouse Beach in July.
In stark contrast to the NSW Department of Primary Industries website, which has no mention of sharks on its home page and requires links to find its so-called “Sharksmart” information, the WA
government has a dedicated shark site, also called Sharksmart.
The WA page provides real-time updates on tagged shark locations, and photos of shark species instead of illustrations.
It also provides clear information on emergency response details and a fact/fiction checklist, which presents uncensored information on the threat posed by some shark species.
BALLINA ATTACK VICTIM WELCOMED HOME
SYDNEY PREPARES FOR SHARK SUMMER
humans, the behaviour of bronze whalers and tiger sharks could vary.
“It is impossible to predict. And every shark behaves differently and every coastline is different,” the expert said.
Matilda Hughes, part-owner of Avoca and Terrigal Learn to Surf, told The Daily Telegraph her business was hurt following a local attack last year.
The 20-year-old said accurate and updated shark education tips were crucial for both locals and tourists.
The DPI said it was looking at improving the NSW Sharksmart program and agreed it was an “important tool to protect beachgoers”.
SHARK ATTACK VICTIM LUCKY AFTER ‘FANNING MOMENT’
WATCH THE AMAZING MICK FANNING SHARK ATTACK VIDEO
Australia : "They share a stunning lack of humility. What unites them is their opinion that other Australians, “out there” in the suburbs, are selfish, parochial, gullible, redneck morons, easily led by evil Right Wing NutJobs (RWNJ)."
Miranda Devine: Turn Left to take the road to damnation
Miranda Devine
The Sunday Telegraph
September 13, 2015
IT is in the egalitarian nature of Australia that we have neglected to cultivate a class of genuine elites. Unfortunately, this vacuum at the top means that a bunch of chattering mediocrities have appointed themselves to the role of our moral and intellectual betters.
Some even have acquired posh accents and a haughty tone to give the impression of superiority.
They share a stunning lack of humility. What unites them is their opinion that other Australians, “out there” in the suburbs, are selfish, parochial, gullible, redneck morons, easily led by evil Right Wing NutJobs (RWNJ).
Our faux elites claim they are driven by altruism, at least when it comes to issues that don’t adversely affect them, like refugee, drug and climate policies.
They don’t live in suburbs affected by drug crime, and can afford to pay for rehab for their wayward offspring.
They don’t have to fish dead bodies out of the ocean or face the consequences of their demand for open borders.
They don’t compete for welfare resources or family reunion quotas with asylum seekers or live near areas of social friction.
They barely notice the soaring energy costs that arise from climate policies they push for reasons of guilt, moral vanity, and in-crowd identity.
Their compassion is employed only in those circumstances where it showcases their status and their membership of a virtuous elite.
Thus, the tragedy of Syria’s civil war only merited their tears after that photograph of a drowned Syrian toddler became a media focal point.
What followed was an unseemly contest to trumpet their sad feelings.
To any reasonable observer, these people are irrational and ridiculous, bordering on downright dangerous.
Their self regard is so extreme that it verges into mass delusion.
Or, to apply a more precise diagnosis, they suffer from an affliction know as “pathological altruism”.
This is the inspired coinage of American systems engineer Barbara Oakley.
In a 2013 paper for the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, she defined it as “behaviour in which attempts to promote the welfare of … others results, instead, in harm that … was reasonably foreseeable.”
So, for instance, if you accidentally break a vase while helping a friend move house, that is not pathological altruism because the bad outcome was not foreseeable.
But if your brother is going through drug withdrawal and you get him more drugs to make him feel better, you are just “enabling his addiction. In this case, your well-meaning altruism is pathological.
Oakley cites examples such as “the overly attentive ‘helicopter’ father who threatens to sue instructors who give well-deserved bad grades, or the mother who attempts to protect her son by refusing to vaccinate him and who consequently fuels a loss of herd immunity underpinning a local whooping cough epidemic in which an infant dies”.
Closer to home, examples abound: drug liberalisers, who wants ice decriminalised might be motivated by a desire to help drug addicts.
But their remedies only exacerbate the harms and increase the numbers of addicts.
Similarly, well-meaning lefties, who talked Kevin Rudd into dismantling Howard-era border protections caused harm to those people they lured across the ocean, to those refugees whose places were taken, and damaged public confidence in our high level of migration. In other words, what might feel altruistic can end up making the situation worse.
“Altruistic intentions must be run through the sieve of rational analysis; all too often, the best long-term action to help others … is not intuitively obvious, not what temporarily makes us feel good, and not what is being promoted by other individuals, with their own self-serving interests,” Oakley says.
Elevating rational analysis over emotion is what the Prime Minister did last week when considering Australia’s response to the Syrian crisis: “It’s important that we act with our head as well as with our heart here.
“While I think we are all in the grip of grief, really, as we saw the tragedy unfolding on our television screens, the responsibility of government ... is to act in a measured and considered way.”
But for taking time to consider, he was criticised.
In our emotionally incontinent culture, driven by the sentimental narcissism of social media, true altruism can seem cruel.
Oakley cites examples of saying “no” to the student who demands a higher grade or to the addict who needs another hit.
“The social consequences of appearing cruel in a culture that places high value on kindness, empathy, and altruism can lead us to misplaced ‘helpful’ behaviour and result in self-deception regarding the consequences of our actions.”
Thus our faux elites damned the Abbott government as cruel when it went about rescuing our immigration system from criminal people smugglers.
They refuse to acknowledge that only because we “stopped the boats” is it possible to offer 12,000 Syrians a new home.
Similarly, they slam the government for skewing the intake towards persecuted minorities, particularly Christians against whom a religious genocide is being waged in the Middle East.
In order to showcase their tolerance they falsely claim helping the most needy is Islamophobic.
No, the altruism flaunted by our phony elites isn’t really about helping refugees or drug addicts or saving the planet.
It’s all about burnishing their reputations.
The road to hell is paved with their good intentions.
Miranda Devine
The Sunday Telegraph
September 13, 2015
IT is in the egalitarian nature of Australia that we have neglected to cultivate a class of genuine elites. Unfortunately, this vacuum at the top means that a bunch of chattering mediocrities have appointed themselves to the role of our moral and intellectual betters.
Some even have acquired posh accents and a haughty tone to give the impression of superiority.
They share a stunning lack of humility. What unites them is their opinion that other Australians, “out there” in the suburbs, are selfish, parochial, gullible, redneck morons, easily led by evil Right Wing NutJobs (RWNJ).
Our faux elites claim they are driven by altruism, at least when it comes to issues that don’t adversely affect them, like refugee, drug and climate policies.
They don’t live in suburbs affected by drug crime, and can afford to pay for rehab for their wayward offspring.
They don’t have to fish dead bodies out of the ocean or face the consequences of their demand for open borders.
They don’t compete for welfare resources or family reunion quotas with asylum seekers or live near areas of social friction.
They barely notice the soaring energy costs that arise from climate policies they push for reasons of guilt, moral vanity, and in-crowd identity.
Their compassion is employed only in those circumstances where it showcases their status and their membership of a virtuous elite.
Thus, the tragedy of Syria’s civil war only merited their tears after that photograph of a drowned Syrian toddler became a media focal point.
What followed was an unseemly contest to trumpet their sad feelings.
To any reasonable observer, these people are irrational and ridiculous, bordering on downright dangerous.
Their self regard is so extreme that it verges into mass delusion.
Or, to apply a more precise diagnosis, they suffer from an affliction know as “pathological altruism”.
This is the inspired coinage of American systems engineer Barbara Oakley.
In a 2013 paper for the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, she defined it as “behaviour in which attempts to promote the welfare of … others results, instead, in harm that … was reasonably foreseeable.”
So, for instance, if you accidentally break a vase while helping a friend move house, that is not pathological altruism because the bad outcome was not foreseeable.
But if your brother is going through drug withdrawal and you get him more drugs to make him feel better, you are just “enabling his addiction. In this case, your well-meaning altruism is pathological.
Oakley cites examples such as “the overly attentive ‘helicopter’ father who threatens to sue instructors who give well-deserved bad grades, or the mother who attempts to protect her son by refusing to vaccinate him and who consequently fuels a loss of herd immunity underpinning a local whooping cough epidemic in which an infant dies”.
Closer to home, examples abound: drug liberalisers, who wants ice decriminalised might be motivated by a desire to help drug addicts.
But their remedies only exacerbate the harms and increase the numbers of addicts.
Similarly, well-meaning lefties, who talked Kevin Rudd into dismantling Howard-era border protections caused harm to those people they lured across the ocean, to those refugees whose places were taken, and damaged public confidence in our high level of migration. In other words, what might feel altruistic can end up making the situation worse.
“Altruistic intentions must be run through the sieve of rational analysis; all too often, the best long-term action to help others … is not intuitively obvious, not what temporarily makes us feel good, and not what is being promoted by other individuals, with their own self-serving interests,” Oakley says.
Elevating rational analysis over emotion is what the Prime Minister did last week when considering Australia’s response to the Syrian crisis: “It’s important that we act with our head as well as with our heart here.
“While I think we are all in the grip of grief, really, as we saw the tragedy unfolding on our television screens, the responsibility of government ... is to act in a measured and considered way.”
But for taking time to consider, he was criticised.
In our emotionally incontinent culture, driven by the sentimental narcissism of social media, true altruism can seem cruel.
Oakley cites examples of saying “no” to the student who demands a higher grade or to the addict who needs another hit.
“The social consequences of appearing cruel in a culture that places high value on kindness, empathy, and altruism can lead us to misplaced ‘helpful’ behaviour and result in self-deception regarding the consequences of our actions.”
Thus our faux elites damned the Abbott government as cruel when it went about rescuing our immigration system from criminal people smugglers.
They refuse to acknowledge that only because we “stopped the boats” is it possible to offer 12,000 Syrians a new home.
Similarly, they slam the government for skewing the intake towards persecuted minorities, particularly Christians against whom a religious genocide is being waged in the Middle East.
In order to showcase their tolerance they falsely claim helping the most needy is Islamophobic.
No, the altruism flaunted by our phony elites isn’t really about helping refugees or drug addicts or saving the planet.
It’s all about burnishing their reputations.
The road to hell is paved with their good intentions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)