An American, Australian ,Israeli, British "Judeo Christian Friendly " blog.

Quote

Warning to all Muslims the world over seeking asylum and protection from the manifestations of their faith.
Do not under any circumstances come to Australia, for we are a Nation founded upon Judeo Christian Law and principles and as such Australia is an anathema to any follower of the Paedophile Slave Trader Mohammad's cult of Islam.
There is no ideology more hated and despised in Australia than Islam.You simply would not like it here.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire French author, humanist, rationalist, & satirist (1694 - 1778)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Those who demand you believe that Islam is a Religion of Peace also demand you believe in Anthropogenic Global Warming.
Aussie News & Views Jan 1 2009
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"But Communism is the god of discontent, and needs no blessing. All it needs is a heart willing to hate, willing to call envy “justice."
Equality then means the violent destruction of all social and cultural distinctions. Freedom means absolute dictatorship over the people."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Hope from the Heart of Man and you make him a Beast of Prey
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“ If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival.
“There may be even a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than live as slaves”
Winston Churchill. Pg.310 “The Hell Makers” John C. Grover ISBN # 0 7316 1918 8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------If language is not correct, then what is said is not what is meant; if what is said is not what is meant, then what must be done remains undone; if this remains undone, morals and art will deteriorate; if justice goes astray, the people will stand about in helpless confusion. Hence there must be no arbitrariness in what is said.
This matters above everything.
—Confucius
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'a socialist is communist without the courage of conviction to say what he really is'.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hontar: We must work in the world, your eminence. The world is thus.
Altamirano: No, Señor Hontar. Thus have we made the world... thus have I made it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Voltaire said: “If you want to know who rules over you, just find out who you are not permitted to criticize.”


--------Check this out, what an Bum WOW!!!!




When those sworn to destroy you,Communism, Socialism,"Change you can Believe in" via their rabid salivating Mongrel Dog,Islam,take away your humanity, your God given Sanctity of Life, Created in His Image , If you are lucky this prayer is maybe all you have left, If you believe in God and his Son,Jesus Christ, then you are, despite the evils that may befall you are better off than most.

Lord, I come before You with a heavy heart. I feel so much and yet sometimes I feel nothing at all. I don't know where to turn, who to talk to, or how to deal with the things going on in my life. You see everything, Lord. You know everything, Lord. Yet when I seek you it is so hard to feel You here with me. Lord, help me through this. I don't see any other way to get out of this. There is no light at the end of my tunnel, yet everyone says You can show it to me. Lord, help me find that light. Let it be Your light. Give me someone to help. Let me feel You with me. Lord, let me see what You provide and see an alternative to taking my life. Let me feel Your blessings and comfort. Amen.
-----------------------------------------
"The chief weapon in the quiver of all Islamist expansionist movements, is the absolute necessity to keep victims largely unaware of the actual theology plotting their demise. To complete this deception, a large body of ‘moderates’ continue to spew such ridiculous claims as “Islam means Peace” thereby keeping non-Muslims from actually reading the Qur’an, the Sira, the Hadith, or actually looking into the past 1400 years of history. Islamists also deny or dismiss the concept of ‘abrogation’, which is the universal intra-Islamic method of replacing slightly more tolerable aspects of the religion in favor of more violent demands for Muslims to slay and subdue infidels"

*DO NOT CLICK ON ANY SENDVID VIDEOS *


Anthropogenic Global Warming SCAM

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Why do we NOT believe those who tell us they want to destoy us ?


War Is Not Far from Us and Is the Midwife of the Chinese Century

Leading CCP official argues for exterminating U.S. population

By Chi Haotian
The Epoch Times
Aug 08, 2005

The following is a transcript of a speech believed to have been given by Mr. Chi Haotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of Chinas Central Military Commission. Independently verifying the authorship of the speech is not possible. It is worth reading because it is believed to set out the CCPs strategy for the development of China. The speech argues for the necessity of China using biological warfare to depopulate the United States and prepare it for a future massive Chinese colonization. The War Is Not Far from Us and Is the Midwife of the Chinese Century was published on February 15, 2005 on www.peacehall.com and was published on www.boxun.com on April 23, 2005. This speech and a related speech, The War Is Approaching Us are analyzed in The Epoch Times original article The CCPs Last-ditch Gamble: Biological and Nuclear War.




Text of the speech:
Comrades,


Im very excited today, because the large-scale online survey sina.com that was done for us showed that our next generation is quite promising and our Partys cause will be carried on. In answering the question, Will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of war, more than 80 percent of the respondents answered in the affirmative, exceeding by far our expectations [1].

Today Id like to focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online survey among our people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time [2], during which I started with a discussion of the issue of the three islands [3], mentioned that 20 years of the idyllic theme of peace and development had come to an end, and concluded that modernization under the saber is the only option for Chinas next phase. I also mentioned we have a vital stake overseas. Today, Ill speak more specifically on these two issues.

The central issue of this survey appears to be whether one should shoot at women, children and prisoners of war, but its real significance goes far beyond that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to figure out what the Chinese peoples attitude towards war is: If these future soldiers do not hesitate to kill even non-combatants, theyll naturally be doubly ready and ruthless in killing combatants. Therefore, the responses to the survey questions may reflect the general attitude people have towards war.

Actually, however, this is not our genuine intention. The purpose of the CCP Central Committee in conducting this survey is to probe peoples minds. We wanted to know: If Chinas global development will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries, will our people endorse that scenario? Will they be for or against it?

As everybody knows, the essence of Comrade Xiaopings [4] thinking is development is the hard truth. And Comrade Jintao [5] has also pointed out repeatedly and empathetically that development is our top priority, which should not be neglected for even a moment. But many comrades tend to understand development in its narrow sense, assuming it to be limited to domestic development. The fact is, our development refers to the great revitalization of the Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we have now but also includes the whole world.

Why do we put it this way?

Both Comrade Liu Huaqing [6], one of the leaders of the old generation in our Party, and Comrade He Xin [7], a young strategist for our Party, have repeatedly stressed the theory regarding the shift of the center of world civilization. Our slogan of revitalizing China has this way of thinking as its basis. You may look into the newspapers and magazines published in recent years or go online to do some research to find out who raised the slogan of national revitalization first. It was Comrade He Xin. Do you know who He Xin is? He may look aggressive and despicable when he speaks in public, with his sleeves and pants all rolled up, but his historical vision is a treasure our Party should cherish.
In discussing this issue, let us start from the beginning.

As everybody knows, according to the views propagated by the Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated from one single mother in Africa. Therefore, no race can claim racial superiority. However, according to the research conducted by most Chinese scholars, the Chinese are different from other races on earth. We did not originate in Africa. Instead, we originated independently in the land of China. The Peking Man at Zhoukoudian that we are all familiar with represents a phase of our ancestors evolution. The Project of Searching for the Origins of the Chinese Civilization currently undertaken in our country is aimed at a more comprehensive and systematic research on the origin, process and development of the ancient Chinese civilization. We used to say, Chinese civilization has had a history of five thousand years. But now, many experts engaged in research in varied fields including archeology, ethnic cultures, and regional cultures have reached consensus that the new discoveries such as the Hongshan Culture in the Northeast, the Liangzhu Culture in Zhejiang province, the Jinsha Ruins in Sichuan province, and the Yongzhou Shun Emperor Cultural Site in Human province are all compelling evidence of the existence of Chinas early civilizations, and they prove that Chinas rice-growing agricultural history alone can be traced back as far as 8,000 to 10,000 years. This refutes the concept of five thousand years of Chinese civilization. Therefore, we can assert that we are the product of cultural roots of more than a million years, civilization and progress of more than ten thousand years, an ancient nation of five thousand years, and a single Chinese entity of two thousand years. This is the Chinese nation that calls itself, descendents of Yan and Huang, the Chinese nation that we are so proud of. Hitlers Germany had once bragged that the German race was the most superior race on Earth, but the fact is, our nation is far superior to the Germans.

During our long history, our people have disseminated throughout the Americas and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and they became Indians in the Americas and the East Asian ethnic groups in the South Pacific.

We all know that on account of our national superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our civilization was at the peak of the world. We were the center of the world civilization, and no other civilization in the world was comparable to ours. Later on, because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the center of the world shifted to the West.

In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the center of the world civilization shift back to China?

Comrade He Xin put it in his report to the Central Committee in 1988: If the fact is that the center of leadership of the world was located in Europe as of the 18th Century, and later shifted to the United States in the mid 20th Century, then in the 21st Century the center of leadership of the world will shift to the East of our planet. And, the East of course mainly refers to China.

Actually, Comrade Liu Huaqing made similar points in early 1980s. Based on an historical analysis, he pointed out that the center of world civilization is shifting. It shifted from the East to Western Europe and later to the United States; now it is shifting back to the East. Therefore, if we refer to the 19th Century as the British Century, and the 20th century as the American Century, then the 21st Century will be the Chinese Century.

To understand conscientiously this historical law and to be prepared to greet the advent of the Chinese Century is the historical mission of our Party. As we all know, at the end of the last century, we built the Altar to the Chinese Century in Beijing. At the very moment of the arrival of the new millennium, the collective leadership of the Party Central Committee gathered there for a rally, upholding the torches of Zhoukoudian, to pledge themselves to get ready to greet the arrival of the Chinese Century. We were doing this to follow the historical law and setting the realization of the Chinese Century as the goal of our Partys endeavors.

Later, in the political report of our Partys Sixteenth National Congress, we established that the national revitalization be our great objective and explicitly specified in our new Party Constitution that our Party is the pioneer of the Chinese people. All these steps marked a major development in Marxism, reflecting our Partys courage and wisdom. As we all know, Marx and his followers have never referred to any communist party as a pioneer of a certain people; neither did they say that national revitalization could be used as a slogan of a communist party. Even Comrade Mao Zedong, a courageous national hero, only raised high the banner of the global proletarian revolution, but even he did not have the courage to give the loudest publicity to the slogan of national revitalization.

We must greet the arrival of the Chinese Century by raising high the banner of national revitalization. How should we fight for the realization of the Chinese Century? We must borrow the precious experiences in human history by taking advantage of the outstanding fruition of human civilization and drawing lessons from what happened to other ethnic groups.

The lessons include the collapse of communism in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, as well as the defeats of Germany and Japan in the past. Recently there has been much discussion on the lessons of the collapse of communism in the former Soviet Union and Eastern European countries, so I will not dwell on them here. Today Id like to talk about the lessons of Germany and Japan.

As we all know, Nazi Germany also placed much emphasis on the education of the people, especially the younger generation. The Nazi party and government organized and established various propaganda and educational institutions such as the Guiding Bureau of National Propaganda, Department of National Education and Propaganda, Supervising Bureau of Worldview Study and Education, and Information Office, all aimed at instilling into the peoples minds, from elementary schools to colleges, the idea that German people are superior, and convincing people that the historical mission of the Arian people is to become the lords of earth that rule over the world. Back then the German people were much more united than we are today.

Nonetheless, Germany was defeated in utter shame, along with its ally, Japan. Why? We reached some conclusions at the study meetings of the Politburo, in which we were searching for the laws that governed the vicissitudes of the big powers, and trying to analyze Germany and Japans rapid growth. When we decide to revitalize China based on the German model, we must not repeat the mistakes they made.

Specifically, the following are the fundamental causes for their defeat: First, they had too many enemies all at once, as they did not adhere to the principle of eliminating enemies one at a time; second, they were too impetuous, lacking the patience and perseverance required for great accomplishments; third, when the time came for them to be ruthless, they turned out to be too soft, therefore leaving troubles that resurfaced later on.

Lets presume that back then Germany and Japan had been able to keep the United States neutral and had fought a protracted war step by step on the Soviet front. If they had adopted this approach, gained some time to advance their research, eventually succeeded in obtaining the technology of nuclear weapons and missiles, and launched surprise attacks against the United States and the Soviet Union using them, then the United States and the Soviet Union would not have been able to defend themselves and would have had to surrender. Little Japan, in particular, made an egregious mistake in launching the sneak strike at Pearl Harbor. This attack did not hit the vital parts of the United States. Instead it dragged the United States into the war, into the ranks of the gravediggers that eventually buried the German and Japanese fascists.

Of course, if they had not made these three mistakes and won the war, history would have been written in a different fashion. If that had been the case, China would not be in our hands. Japan might have relocated their capital to China and ruled over China. Afterwards, China and the whole of Asia under Japans command would have brought into full play the oriental wisdom, conquered the West ruled by Germany and unified the whole world. This is irrelevant, of course. No more digressions.

So, the fundamental reason for the defeats of Germany and Japan is that history did not arrange them to be the lords of the earth, for they are, after all, not the most superior race.

Ostensibly, in comparison, todays China is alarmingly similar to Germany back then. Both of them regard themselves as the most superior races; both of them have a history of being exploited by foreign powers and are therefore vindictive; both of them have the tradition of worshipping their own authorities; both of them feel that they have seriously insufficient living space; both of them raise high the two banners of nationalism and socialism and label themselves as national socialism; both of them worship one state, one party, one leader, and one doctrine.

And yet, if we really are to make a comparison between Germany and China, then, as Comrade Jiang Zemin put it, Germany belongs to pediatrics too trivial to be compared. How large is Germanys population? How big is its territory? And how long is its history? We eliminated eight million Nationalist troops in only three years. How many enemies did Germany kill? They were in power for a transient period of little more than a dozen years before they perished, while we are still energetic after being around for more than eighty years. Our theory of the shifting center of civilization is of course more profound than the Hitlers theory of the lords of the earth. Our civilization is profound and broad, which has determined that we are so much wiser than they were.

Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis, our ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages.

These two heritages determined that we have a stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race has been able to prosper for so long. We are destined not to be buried by either heaven or earth no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national disasters. This is our advantage.

Take response to war as an example. The reason that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on its mainland. Once its enemies aim at the mainland, they enemies would have already reached Washington before its congress finishes debating and authorizes the president to declare war. But for us, we dont waste time on these trivial things. Comrade Deng Xiaoping once said, The Partys leadership is prompt in making decisions. Once a decision is made, it is immediately implemented. Theres no wasting time on trivial things like in capitalist countries. This is our advantage. Our Partys democratic centralism is built on the tradition of great unity. Although fascist Germany also stressed high-level centralism, they only focused on the power of the countrys executive, but ignored the collective leadership of the central group. Thats why Hitler was betrayed by many later in his life, which fundamentally depleted the Nazis of their war capacity.

What makes us different from Germany is that we are complete atheists, while Germany was primarily a Catholic and Protestant country. Hitler was only half atheist. Although Hitler also believed that ordinary citizens had low intelligence, and that leaders should therefore make decisions, and although German people worshipped Hitler back then, Germany did not have the tradition of worshipping sages on a broad basis. Our Chinese society has always worshipped sages, and that is because we dont worship any god. Once you worship a god, you cant worship a person at the same time, unless you recognize the person as the gods representative like they do in Middle Eastern countries. On the other hand, once you recognize a person as a sage, of course you will want him to be your leader, instead of monitoring and choosing him. This is the foundation of our democratic centralism.

The bottom line is, only China, not Germany, is a reliable force in resisting the Western parliament-based democratic system. Hitlers dictatorship in Germany was perhaps but a momentary mistake in history.

Maybe you have now come to understand why we recently decided to further promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the West into China and empty us from the inside, if we let all Chinese people listen to God and follow God, who will obediently listen to us and follow us? If the common people dont believe Comrade Hu Jintao is a qualified leader, question his authority, and want to monitor him, if the religious followers in our society question why we are leading God in churches, can our Party continue to rule China?

Germanys dream to be the lord of the earth failed, because ultimately, history did not bestow this great mission upon them. But the three lessons Germany learned from experience are what we ought to remember as we complete our historic mission and revitalize our race. The three lessons are: Firmly grasp the countrys living space, firmly grasp the Partys control over the nation, and firmly grasp the general direction toward becoming the lord of the earth.

Next, Id like to address these three issues.

The first issue is living space. This is the biggest focus of the revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last speech, I said that the fight over basic living resources (including land and ocean) is the source of the vast majority of wars in history. This may change in the information age, but not fundamentally. Our per capita resources are much less than those of Germanys back then. In addition, economic development in the last twenty-plus years had a negative impact, and climates are rapidly changing for the worse. Our resources are in very short supply. The environment is severely polluted, especially that of soil, water, and air. Not only our ability to sustain and develop our race, but even its survival is gravely threatened, to a degree much greater than faced Germany back then.




China poised to play debt card – for U.S. land
Communist nation could control American land as ‘development zones’
(Dr. Jerome R. Corsi) – Could real estate on American soil owned by China be set up as “development zones” in which the communist nation could establish Chinese-owned businesses and bring in its citizens to the U.S. to work?
That’s part of an evolving proposal Beijing has been developing quietly since 2009 to convert more than $1 trillion of U.S debt it owns into equity.

Anybody who has been to Western countries knows that their living space is much better than ours. They have forests alongside the highways, while we hardly have any trees by our streets. Their sky is often blue with white clouds, while our sky is covered with a layer of dark haze. Their tap water is clean enough for drinking, while even our ground water is so polluted that it cant be drunk without filtering. They have few people in the streets, and two or three people can occupy a small residential building; in contrast, our streets are always crawling with people, and several people have to share one room.


Many years ago, there was a book titled Yellow Catastrophes. It said that, due to our following the American style of consumption, our limited resources would no longer support the population and society would collapse, once our population reaches 1.3 billion. Now our population has already exceeded this limit, and we are now relying on imports to sustain our nation. Its not that we havent paid attention to this issue. The Ministry of Land Resources is specialized in this issue.

But the term living space (lebensraum) is too closely related to Nazi Germany. The reason we dont want to discuss this too openly is to avoid the Wests association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in turn reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in our emphasis on He Xins new theory, Human rights are just living rights, we only talk about living, but not space, so as to avoid using the term living space. From the perspective of history, the reason that China is faced with the issue of living space is because Western countries have developed ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries established colonies all around the world, therefore giving themselves an advantage on the issue of living space. To solve this problem, we must lead the Chinese people outside of China, so that they could develop outside of China.

The second issue is our focus on the leadership capacity of the ruling party. Weve done better on this than their party. Although the Nazis spread their power to every aspect of the German national government, they did not stress their absolute leadership position like we have. They did not take the issue of managing the power of the party as first priority, which we have. When Comrade Mao Zedong summarized the three treasures of our partys victory in conquering the country, he considered the most important treasure to be developing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and strengthening its leadership position.

We have to focus on two points to fortify our leadership position and improve our leadership capacity.

The first is to promote the Three Represents theory [8], stressing that our Party is the pioneer of the Chinese race, in addition to being the pioneer of the proletariat. Many citizens say in private, We never voted for you, the Communist Party, to represent us. How can you claim to be our representatives?

Theres no need to worry about this issue. Comrade Mao Zedong said that if we could lead our allies to victory and make them benefit, they would support us. Therefore, as long as we can lead the Chinese people outside of China, resolving the lack of living space in China, the Chinese people will support us. At that time, we dont have to worry about the labels of totalitarianism or dictatorship. Whether we can forever represent the Chinese people depends on whether we can succeed in leading the Chinese people out of China.

The second point, whether we can lead the Chinese people out of China, is the most important determinant of the CCPs leadership position.

Why do I say this?

Everyone knows that without the leadership of our Party, China would not exist today. Therefore, our highest principle is to forever protect our Partys leadership position. Before June 4, we realized vaguely that as long as Chinas economy is developed, people would support and love the Communist Party. Therefore we had to use several decades of peacetime to develop Chinas economy. No matter what -isms, whether it is a white cat or a black cat, it is a good cat if it can develop Chinas economy. But at that time, we did not have mature ideas about how China would deal with international disputes after its economy is developed.

Comrade Xiaoping said then that the main themes in the world were peace and development. But the June 4 riot gave our Party a warning and gave us a lesson that is still fresh. The pressure of Chinas peaceful evolution makes us reconsider the main themes of our time. We see that neither of these two issues, peace and development, have been resolved. The western oppositional forces always change the world according to their own visions; they want to change China and use peaceful evolution to overturn the leadership of our Communist Party. Therefore, if we only develop the economy, we still face the possibility of losing control.

That June 4 riot almost succeeded in bringing a peaceful transition; if it were not for the fact that a large number of veteran comrades were still alive and at a crucial moment they removed Zhao Ziyang and his followers, then we all would have been put in prison. After death we would have been too ashamed to report to Marx. Although we have passed the test of June 4, after our group of senior comrades pass away, without our control, peaceful evolution may still come to China like it did to the former Soviet Union. In 1956, they suppressed the Hungarian Incident and defeated the attacks by Titos revisionists of Yugoslavia, but they could not withstand Gorbachev thirty some years later. Once those pioneering senior comrades died, the power of the Communist Party was taken away by peaceful evolution.

After the June 4 riot was suppressed, we have been thinking about how to prevent China from peaceful evolution and how to maintain the Communist Partys leadership. We thought it over and over but did not come up with any good ideas. If we do not have good ideas, China will inevitably change peacefully, and we will all become criminals in history. After some deep pondering, we finally come to this conclusion: Only by turning our developed national strength into the force of a fist striking outwardonly by leading people to go out can we win forever the Chinese peoples support and love for the Communist Party. Our Party will then stand on invincible ground, and the Chinese people will have to depend on the Communist Party. They will forever follow the Communist Party with their hearts and minds, as was written in a couplet frequently seen in the countryside some years ago: Listen to Chairman Mao, Follow the Communist Party! Therefore, the June 4 riot made us realize that we must combine economic development with preparation for war and leading the people to go out! Therefore, since then, our national defense policy has taken a 180 degree turn and we have since emphasized more and more combining peace and war. Our economic development is all about preparing for the need of war! Publicly we still emphasize economic development as our center, but in reality, economic development has war as its center! We have made a tremendous effort to construct The Great Wall Project to build up, along our coastal and land frontiers as well as around large and medium-sized cities, a solid underground Great Wall that can withstand a nuclear war. We are also storing all necessary war materials. Therefore, we will not hesitate to fight a Third World War, so as to lead the people to go out and to ensure the Partys leadership position. In any event, we, the CCP, will never step down from the stage of history! Wed rather have the whole world, or even the entire globe, share life and death with us than step down from the stage of history!!! Isnt there a nuclear bondage theory? It means that since nuclear weapons have bound the security of the entire world, all will die together if death is inevitable. In my view, there is another kind of bondage, and that is, the fate our Party is tied up with that of the whole world. If we, the CCP, are finished, China will be finished, and the world will be finished.

Our Partys historical mission is to lead the Chinese people to go out. If we take the long view, we will see that history led us on this path. First, Chinas long history has resulted in the worlds largest population, including Chinese in China as well as overseas. Second, once we open our doors, the profit-seeking western capitalists will invest capital and technology in China to assist our development, so that they can occupy the biggest market in the world. Third, our numerous overseas Chinese help us create the most favorable environment for the introduction of foreign capital, foreign technology and advanced experience into China. Thus, it is guaranteed that our reform and open-door policy will achieve tremendous success. Fourth, Chinas great economic expansion will inevitably lead to the shrinkage of per-capita living space for the Chinese people, and this will encourage China to turn outward in search for new living space. Fifth, Chinas great economic expansion will inevitably come with a significant development in our military forces, creating conditions for our expansion overseas. Even since Napoleons time, the West has been has been alert for the possible awakening of the sleeping lion that is China. Now, the sleeping lion is standing up and advancing into the world, and has become unstoppable!

What is the third issue we should clinch firmly in order to accomplish our historical mission of national renaissance? It is to hold firmly onto the big issue of America.

Comrade Mao Zedong taught us that we must have a resolute and correct political orientation. What is our key, correct orientation? It is to solve the issue of America.

This appears to be shocking, but the logic is actually very simple.

Comrade He Xin put forward a very fundamental judgment that is very reasonable. He asserted in his report to the Party Central Committee: The renaissance of China is in fundamental conflict with the western strategic interest, and therefore will inevitably be obstructed by the western countries doing everything they can. So, only by breaking the blockade formed by the western countries headed by the United States can China grow and move towards the world!

Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan and some other countries! Second, even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very trivial! Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization.

Therefore, solving the issue of America is the key to solving all other issues. First, this makes it possible for us to have many people migrate there and even establish another China under the same leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the white race. We the descendents of the Chinese nation are entitled to the possession of the land! It is said that the residents of the yellow race have a very low social status in United States. We need to liberate them. Second, after solving the issue of America, the western countries in Europe would bow to us, not to mention to Taiwan, Japan and other small countries. Therefore, solving the issue of America is the mission assigned to CCP members by history.

I sometimes think how cruel it is for China and the United States to be enemies that are bound to meet on a narrow road! Do you remember a movie about Liberation Army troops led by Liu Bocheng and Deng Xiaoping? The title is something like Decisive Battle on the Central Plains. There is a famous remark in the movie that is full of power and grandeur: The enemies are bound to meet on a narrow road, only the brave will win! It is this kind of fighting to win or die spirit that enabled us to seize power in Mainland China. It is historical destiny that China and United States will come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight each other! The United States, unlike Russia and Japan, has never occupied and hurt China, and also assisted China in its battle against the Japanese. But, it will certainly be an obstruction, and the biggest obstruction! In the long run, the relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle.

One time, some Americans came to visit and tried to convince us that the relationship between China and United States is one of interdependence. Comrade Xiaoping replied in a polite manner: Go tell your government, China and the United States do not have such a relationship that is interdependent and mutually reliant. Actually, Comrade Xiaoping was being too polite, he could have been more frank, The relationship between China and United States is one of a life-and-death struggle. Of course, right now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our reform and opening to the outside world still rely on their capital and technology, we still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and use America as an example to reconstruct our country.

How have we managed our foreign affairs in these years? Even if we had to put on a smiling face in order to please them, even if we had to give them the right cheek after they had hit our left cheek, we still must endure in order to further our relationship with the United States. Do you remember the character of Wuxun in the movie the Story of Wuxun? In order to accomplish his mission, he endured so much pain and suffered so much beating and kicking! The United States is the most successful country in the world today. Only after we have learned all of its useful experiences can we replace it in the future. Even though we are presently imitating the American tone China and United States rely on each other and share honor and disgrace, we must not forget that the history of our civilization repeatedly has taught us that one mountain does not allow two tigers to live together.

We also must never forget what Comrade Xiaoping emphasized refrain from revealing the ambitions and put others off the track. The hidden message is: we must put up with America; we must conceal our ultimate goals, hide our capabilities and await the opportunity. In this way, our mind is clear. Why have we not updated our national anthem with something peaceful? Why did we not change the anthems theme of war? Instead, when revising the Constitution this time, for the first time we clearly specified March of the Volunteers is our national anthem. Thus we will understand why we constantly talk loudly about the Taiwan issue but not the American issue. We all know the principle of doing one thing under the cover of another. If ordinary people can only see the small island of Taiwan in their eyes, then you as the elite of our country should be able to see the whole picture of our cause. Over these years, according to Comrade Xiaopings arrangement, a large piece of our territory in the North has been given up to Russia; do you really think our Party Central Committee is a fool?

To resolve the issue of America we must be able to transcend conventions and restrictions. In history, when a country defeated another country or occupied another country, it could not kill all the people in the conquered land, because back then you could not kill people effectively with sabers or long spears, or even with rifles or machine guns. Therefore, it was impossible to gain a stretch of land without keeping the people on that land. However, if we conquered America in this fashion, we would not be able to make many people migrate there.

Only by using special means to clean up America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. This is the only choice left for us. This is not a matter of whether we are willing to do it or not. What kind of special means is there available for us to clean up America? Conventional weapons such as fighters, canons, missiles and battleships wont do; neither will highly destructive weapons such as nuclear weapons. We are not as foolish as to want to perish together with America by using nuclear weapons, despite the fact that we have been exclaiming that we will have the Taiwan issue resolved at whatever cost. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio weapons have been invented one after another. Of course we have not been idle; in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of cleaning up America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focus instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy country.

From a humanitarian perspective, we should issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave America and leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at least they should leave half of the United States to be Chinas colony, because America was first discovered by the Chinese. But would this work? If this strategy does not work, then there is only one choice left to us. That is, use decisive means to clean up America, and reserve America for our use in a moment. Our historical experience has proven that as long as we make it happen, nobody in the world can do anything about us. Furthermore, if the United States as the leader is gone, then other enemies have to surrender to us.

Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the Chinese people are strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is bound to take place. According to the computation of the author of Yellow Peril, more than half of the Chinese will die, and that figure would be more than 800 million people! Just after the liberation, our yellow land supported nearly 500 million people, while today the official figure of the population is more than 1.3 billion. This yellow land has reached the limit of its capacity. One day, who knows how soon it will come, the great collapse will occur any time and more than half of the population will have to go.

We must prepare ourselves for two scenarios. If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack [on the United States], the Chinese people will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fight against the United States. If, however, the attack fails and triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China would perhaps suffer a catastrophe in which more than half of its population would perish. That is why we need to be ready with air defense systems for our big and medium-sized cities. Whatever the case may be, we can only move forward fearlessly for the sake of our Party and state and our nations future, regardless of the hardships we have to face and the sacrifices we have to make. The population, even if more than half dies, can be reproduced. But if the Party falls, everything is gone, and forever gone!

In Chinese history, in the replacement of dynasties, the ruthless have always won and the benevolent have always failed. The most typical example involved Xiang Yu the King of Chu, who, after defeating Liu Bang, failed to continue to chase after him and eliminate his forces, and this leniency resulted in Xiang Yus death and Lius victory (during the war between Chu and Han, just after the Qin Dynasty (221-206BC) was overthrown). Therefore, we must emphasize the importance of adopting resolute measures. In the future, the two rivals, China and the United States, will eventually meet each other in a narrow road, and our leniency to the Americans will mean cruelty toward the Chinese people.    Here some people may want to ask me: what about the several millions of our compatriots in the United States? They may ask: arent we against Chinese killing other Chinese?

These comrades are too pedantic; they are not pragmatic enough. If we had insisted on the principle that the Chinese should not kill other Chinese, would we have liberated China? As for the several million Chinese living in the United States, this is of course a big issue. Therefore in recent years, we have been conducting research on genetic weapons, i.e. those weapons that do not kill yellow people. But producing a result with this kind of research is extremely difficult. Of the research done on genetic weapons throughout the world, the Israelis is the most advanced. Their genetic weapons are designed to target Arabs and protect the Israelis. But even they have not reached the stage of actual deployment. We have cooperated with Israel on some research. Perhaps we can introduce some of the technologies used to protect Israelis and remold these technologies to protect the yellow people. But their technologies are not mature yet, and it is difficult for us to surpass them in a few years. If it has to be five or ten years before some breakthroughs can be achieved in genetic weapons, we cannot afford to wait any longer.

Old comrades like us cannot afford to wait that long, for we dont have that much time to live. Old soldiers of my age may be able to wait for five or ten more years, but those from the period of the Anti-Japanese War or the few old Red Army soldiers cannot wait any longer. Therefore we have to give up our expectations about genetic weapons. Of course, from another perspective, the majority of those Chinese living in the United States have become our burden, because they have been corrupted by the bourgeois liberal values for a long time and it would be difficult for them to accept our Partys leadership. If they survived the war, we would have to launch campaigns in the future to deal with them, to reform them. Do you still remember that when we had just defeated the Koumintang (KMT) and liberated Mainland China, so many people from the bourgeois class and intellectuals welcomed us so very warmly, but later we had to launch campaigns such as the suppression of the reactionaries and Anti-Rightist Movement to clean them up and reform them? Some of them were in hiding for a long time and were not exposed until the Cultural Revolution. History has proved that any social turmoil is likely to involve many deaths. Maybe we can put it this way: death is the engine that moves history forward. During the period of Three Kingdoms [9], how many people died? When Genghis Khan conquered Eurasia, how many people died? When Manchu invaded the interior of China, how many people died? Not many people died during the 1911 Revolution, but when we overthrew the Three Great Mountains [10], and during the political campaigns such as Suppression of reactionaries, Three-Anti Campaign, and Five-Anti Campaign at least 20 million people died. We were apprehensive that some young people today would be trembling with fear when they hear about wars or people dying. During wartime, we were used to seeing dead people. Blood and flesh were flying everywhere, corpses were lying in heaps on the fields, and blood ran like rivers. We saw it all. On the battlefields, everybodys eyes turned red with killing because it was a life-and-death struggle and only the brave would survive.

It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century in which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians, do not want deaths. But if history confronts us with a choice between deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, wed have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the Chinese people and the life of our Party. That is because, after all, we are Chinese and members of the CCP. Since the day we joined the CCP, the Partys life has always been above all else! History will prove that we made the right choice.

Now, when I am about to finish my speech, you probably understand why we conducted this online survey. Simply put, through conducting this online survey we wanted to know whether the people would rise against us if one day we secretly adopt resolute means to clean up America. Would more people support us or oppose us? This is our basic judgment: if our people approve of shooting at prisoners of war, women and children, then they would approve our cleaning up America. For over twenty years, China has been enjoying peace, and a whole generation has not been tested by war. In particular, since the end of World War II, there have been many changes in the formats of war, the concept of war and the ethics of war. Especially since the collapse of the former Soviet Union and Eastern European Communist states, the ideology of the West has come to dominate the world as a whole, and the Western theory of human nature and Western view of human rights have increasingly disseminated among the young people in China. Therefore, we were not very sure about the peoples attitude. If our people are fundamentally opposed to cleaning up America, we will, of course, have to adopt corresponding measures.

Why didnt we conduct the survey through administrative means instead of through the web? We did what we did for a good reason.

First of all, we did it to reduce artificial inference and to make sure that we got the true thoughts of the people. In addition, it is more confidential and wont reveal the true purpose of our survey. But what is most important is the fact that most of the people who are able to respond to the questions online are from social groups that are relatively well-educated and intelligent. They are the hard-core and leading groups that play a decisive role among our people. If they support us, then the people as a whole will follow us; if they oppose us, they will play the dangerous role of inciting people and creating social disturbance.

What turned out to be very comforting is they did not turn in a blank test paper. In fact, they turned in a test paper with a score of over 80. This is the excellent fruition of our Partys work in propaganda and education over the past few decades.

Of course, a few people under the Western influence have objected to shooting at prisoners of war and women and children. Some of them said, It is shocking and scary to witness so many people approving of shooting at women and children. Is everybody crazy? Some others said, The Chinese love to label themselves as a peace-loving people, but actually they are the most ruthless people. The comments are resonant of killing and murdering, sending chills to my heart.

Although there are not too many people holding this kind of viewpoint and they will not affect the overall situation in any significant way, but we still need to strengthen the propaganda to respond to this kind of argument.

That is to vigorously propagate Comrade He Xin's latest article, which has already been reported to the central government. You may look it up on the website.

If you get on the website using key words to search, you will find out that a while ago, comrade He Xin pointed out to the Hong Kong Business News during an interview that: "The US has a shocking conspiracy." According to what he had in hand, from September 27 to October 1, 1995, the Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachv Foundation, funded by the United States, gathered 500 of the worlds most important statesmen, economic leaders and scientists, including George W. Bush (he was not the US president at the time), the Baroness Thatcher, Tony Blair, Zbigniew Brzezinski, as well as George Soros, Bill Gates, futurist John Naisbitt, etc., all of the worlds most popular characters, in the San Francisco Fairmont hotel for a high-level round table conference, discussing problems about globalization and how to guide humanity to move forward into the 21st century. According to what He Xin had in hand, the outstanding people of the world in attendance thought that in the 21st century a mere 20% of the worlds population will be sufficient to maintain the worlds economy and prosperity, the other 80% or 4/5 of the worlds population will be human garbage unable to produce new values. The people in attendance thought that this excess 80% population would be a trash population and "high-tech" means should be used to eliminate them gradually.

Since the enemies are secretly planning to eliminate our population, we certainly cannot be infinitely merciful and compassionate to them. Comrade He Xin's article came out at the right time, it has proven the correctness of our tit for tat battle approach, has proven Comrade Deng Xiaopings great foresight to deploy against the United States military strategy.

Certainly, in spreading Comrade He Xins views, we cannot publish the article in the party newspapers, in order to avoid raising the enemys vigilance. He Xin's conversation may remind the enemy that we have grasped the modern science and technology, including "clean" nuclear technology, gene weapons technology as well as biological weapons technology, and we can use powerful measures to eliminate their population on a large-scale.

The last problem I want to talk about is of firmly seizing the preparations for military battle.

Currently, we are at the cross road of moving forward or backward. Some comrades saw problems flooding everywhere in our countrythe corruption problem, the state-owned enterprise problem, the banks bad accounts problem, environmental problems, society security problems, education problems, the AIDS problem, various appeals problem, even the riots problem. These comrades vacillated in the determination to prepare for the military battle. They thought; they should first grab the political reform problem, that is, our own political reform comes first. After resolving the domestic problems, we can then deal with the foreign military battle problem.

This reminds me of the crucial period in 1948 in the Chinese revolution. At that time, the People's Liberation Armys horses were drinking water in Yangtze River, but they faced extremely complex situations and difficult problems everywhere in the liberated areas, and the central authority received emergency reports daily. What to do? Should we stop to manage rear areas and internal matters first before moving forward, or press on to pass the Yangtze River with one vigorous effort? Chairman Mao, with his extraordinary wisdom and mettle, gave the marching order "Carry on the revolution to the end," and liberated all of China. The previously thought "serious" conflicting problems were all resolved in this great forward moving revolutionary wave.

Now, it seems like we are in the same critical period as the horses were drinking water in the Yangtze River days in the revolutionary era, as long as we firmly seize the most basic principle of preparing for the military battle. The central committee believes, as long as we resolve the United States problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved. Therefore, our military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan, but in fact is aimed at the United States, and the preparation is far beyond the scope of attacking aircraft carriers or satellites.

Marxism pointed out that violence is the midwife for the birth of the new society. Therefore war is the midwife for the birth of Chinas century. As war approaches, I am full of hope for our next generation.


Notes:

[1] Sina.com is one of the largest on-line media corporations in China. The on-line survey was launched by sina.coms branch Sina Military (jczs.sina.com.cn). It started on February 2 and ended on March 1, 2004 and there were 31,872 persons who filled out the survey. The web page for this on-line survey is at http://jczs.sina.com.cn/2004-02-02/1644180066.html but this page has been removed and cannot be viewed.

The question was If you are a solider, and if are under the orders of your commanding officers, will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of war? 34% of the visitors answered they would shoot under any circumstances even without permission from their commanding officer. 48.6% of the visitors replied that they would shoot when the lives of themselves or their companies are threatened. Only 3.8% of the participants held they would not shoot under any circumstances. Those who agreed to shoot were mostly under the age of 25.

[2] War Is Approaching Us

[3] Three islands refer to Taiwan, Diaoyu Islands, and Spratly Islands.

[4] Deng Xiaoping (1904-1997). Officially, Deng was the leader of the CCP and China from 1978-89. Actually, after Mao's death in 1976 Deng became the de facto leader of China until Deng finally died in 1997.

[5] Hu Jintao (1942-). Leader of the "fourth generation" of CCP officials. In 2003, Hu became President of the People's Republic of China.

[6] Liu Huaqing (1916-). Commander of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy from 1982 through 1988, vice-chairman of Chinas Central Military Commission (until 1997). Liu is considered to be responsible for the PLAs modernization efforts.

[7] He Xin (1949-). Senior Fellow of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

[8] Three Represents states that the CCP represents the requirement to develop advanced productive forces, an orientation towards advanced culture, and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the people in China. It was put forward by Jiang Zemin, former Chinese president.

[9] Three Kingdoms refer to Wei, Shu, and Wu, three countries that overlapped the land of China during the period A.D. 220-80.

[10] Three great mountains were said according to the CCP to have weighed on the backs of the Chinese peopleimperialism, feudalism and bureaucratic-capitalism.

The original Chinese article is available at: http://epochtimes.com/gb/5/8/1/n1003911.htm

Monday, January 28, 2013

Mali another Islamic Utopia in the making,courtesy of Obama's "Peace Partners"


From amputations to army reprisal, it's hell

FLORAL BAGENAL, BAMAKO 
The Times 
January 28, 2013 12:00AM

AFTER being dragged from his home, blindfolded, kicked, beaten and taunted, truck driver Solemon Trarre thought the worst of his ordeal as a prisoner of Islamist militants in Mali was over.

He was wrong.

They tied him to a chair on a patch of land in the city of Gao. Militants crowded round, shouting, "God is great", and firing guns in the air. Then one of them cut off his hand with a kitchen knife.

"I was screaming and crying with pain and there was a lot of blood," said Trarre, 25, last week in Bamako, the capital, recalling the "operation" he underwent in October.



Trarre is one of hundreds of thousands of people who have fled the north of the country and the brutal law of amputations and stonings imposed by jihadist rebels across a territory twice as big as Germany.

Their tales of atrocities committed under the black al-Qa'ida banner, and reports of hardship in northern cities deprived of supplies, have added urgency to a northward push by French forces to liberate the ancient cities of Gao and Timbuktu.


According to Omar Toure, 28, a teacher who fled Timbuktu two weeks ago, battle-hardened Islamist militants are preparing for a long fight in the desert.

"There are training camps where fighters practise and even children are taught to handle weapons," he said.

Toure said a friend caught kissing his girlfriend was punished with a public flogging by militants, whose northern enclave has become a magnet for jihadist fighters from all over North Africa.

They have banned smoking and music and are said to have destroyed countless centuries-old texts that were hidden in houses in Timbuktu's warren of dusty streets.

Communications with the city were cut off last week after heavy French airstrikes in the area.

The city, famous in the West as a synonym for somewhere far from anywhere, has had no water or power for days.

Aid agencies warn of a looming humanitarian crisis amid fears that northern cities will run out of food and medical supplies.

"We pray they (the French) will come soon," said a resident of Gao.

French and Malian government forces yesterday reached the town of Hombori, one of the three largest under militant control. Their advance raised hopes that Timbuktu could be liberated in weeks.

But satisfaction in Paris and Bamako with the speed of the French advance has been tempered by reports of human rights violations by the West's latest ally in the war against terror, the ill-equipped army of Mali.

Corinne Dufka, a senior investigator for Human Rights Watch, said it had two credible accounts of suspected Islamist sympathisers being lined up and shot by soldiers in towns recaptured by the government over the past two weeks.

"We're talking about a dangerous rule-of-law vacuum," she said.

Up to 35 people are believed to have been killed by Malian soldiers in the days just before and after the French intervention.

Residents in the cities of Mopti, Sevare and Niono reported seeing bodies hastily buried by soldiers.

In one incident on January 10, the day before French airstrikes began, people are said to have been shot near a bus station in Sevare and their bodies thrown down a well.

In another incident in Konna, witnesses said jubilant Malian troops, buoyed by the sudden shift of power in their favour, ransacked homes, looting money and phones and dragging off a preacher accused of fighting with the rebels.

"The soldiers surrounded the house of a marabout (Koranic teacher) suspected of helping the jihadists," said Mohamone Omar. "He was taken away and no one knows what happened to him. We were told he was shot."

Gunshots have been heard from inside military camps where prisoners are held.

Men have been arrested simply because they have beards in the Islamist style, reports said.

Police are also involved in the crackdown: a suspected Islamist sympathiser was reportedly shaved in a police station.

There are concerns about reprisals against Tuaregs - one of the ethnic groups associated with the rebellion in the north - by the Malian military and militia supporting the government.

The army's woeful lack of supplies was demonstrated in a film on YouTube that showed soldiers making shooting sounds in training exercises because they did not have any bullets.

Trarre hopes the French will swiftly rid the north of the Islamists who mutilated him for hiding weapons left by fleeing government soldiers.

"I hope they dig a huge hole and bury those bastards alive in it," he said.

The Sunday Times

Islamic Science and innovation knows no limits all courtesy of Barack Hussein Obama's "Peace Partners" "God" the  Moon God allah.

Ah, the technology! The science! An actual invention from the Muslim world. Finally, an original invention. I hope we see its inclusion in the 1001 Muslim Inventions, a traveling museum exhibit.
Iran unveils machine for amputating thieves' fingers Jihadwatch


Coming to a suburb near You in the name of Multiculturalism and Diversity and don't forget Tolerance.
You object ? then you must be a RACIST!!!!!
K I L L!! THE RACIST!! K I L L!!THE INFIDEL!! in the name of
Multiculturalism,Diversity and Tolerance,


Littler Bub rescued by Helicoptor Mum trapped in flood




Sunday, January 27, 2013

Australia: Queensland ,Tornados, "Catastrophic" weather conditions headed to NSW over next 24 hours



Australia's Finest,Private Nathanael Galagher.



"Then there was a knock at my door," Lance-Cpl Feeney said. "There were three men in army uniform standing there and I knew then.
" I knew instantly."


Digger's boy has father's fighting spirit

EXCLUSIVE LAURA SPERANZA
The Sunday Telegraph
January 27, 201312:00AM

HE has the same fighting spirit as the father he never met.


Three months before Jack Galagher was born, Private Nathanael Galagher died beside his mates on the battlefields of Afghanistan.

But even though the man she loved is gone, Jack's mother Lance Corporal Jessie Feeney rejoices every day that she has been blessed with a son who is so like him.

"He has his nature - he's really easy-going and happy in his own skin," Lance-Cpl Feeney said yesterday. "Nate was exactly the same."

Cradling her newborn boy, Lance-Cpl Feeney said one day she will tell him how special his Dad was.

"I want Jack to know his Dad like I did, like he's still here with us," Lance-Cpl Feeney said. "When Jack gets older, I'll be able to explain what happened. I want him to know his dad is a hero."

If one day Jack decides to follow his father's path and join the army it will come as no surprise to Lance-Cpl Feeney, who is a storewoman based at Holsworthy Barracks.

"If that's his choice, I will back him 100 per cent and I'll be proud of him," she said. "I'll be able to understand why, because he knows his Dad was a hero and he might want to follow in his footsteps."

Pte Galagher, 23, from Narrabri in the state's north, and Lance-Cpl Feeney, 22, met in 2007 while training in the Army. But it wasn't until they were both posted to Townsville that they fell in love - two years ago today. As they excitedly awaited the birth of their son, Pte Galagher departed for his second deployment in Afghanistan in July.

"He kissed my belly and he said 'I'll see you when I get back'," Lance-Cpl Feeney said.


He was killed beside his idol, Lance-Cpl Mervyn McDonald, on August 30 when their helicopter crashed in Helmand province as they were preparing for a late-night raid on a Taliban position.

When Lance-Cpl Feeney heard about the crash, it didn't cross her mind that her partner could be involved.

The pair had spoken via Skype just hours before.

"Then there was a knock at my door," Lance-Cpl Feeney said. "There were three men in army uniform standing there and I knew then.

" I knew instantly."

She was six-and-a-half months pregnant. Over the Australia Day weekend she reflected on and remembered her beloved "hero" who lived for the Army.

Never far from her thoughts are the troops still in Afghanistan. Her message to them is a simple one: "Keep your heads up. You're doing a great job and all of Australia respects and admires your hard work.

"Hopefully you'll be home soon to see your families.

"If anyone says to our troops they shouldn't be there, they don't agree with that. That's their job and that's what they love to do." As for her own future, she said: "It was only after I'd had Jack, it hit me that this was my life now Nate was gone and I was going to be a single mum."

Meet the Pious Alameddine Family: Exploite the Infidel at every opportunity especially of they are among the most vunerable.





Is there no level these Godless Swine, "Cultural Enrichment" Diversity Ambassadors  won't sink to?




Sydney's Occupied Territories: Tim Priest Down the Barrel of a Gun or Australia's Gun Laws




There have been comments made in the media recently abou the current Sydney shooting epidemic compared with the year 2000 which is still considered the "record" year for shooting incidents in our city.

Invariably the comparisons between the two time periods tend to play down the current
situation and perhaps make us feel a little relieved that things are not as bad as they were
more than a decade ago.

But there are distinct differences between the two time periods that have not
been publicly explained and they need to be.

The year 1999-2000 was the year that Cabramatta exploded into an all-out gang
war between two rival groups who were seeking control of Australia's heroin capital,
Cabramatta. Many of the murders that occurred were linked to the two warring
gangs or their associates.

In the main, the shootings were confined to a very small geographical area, much
smaller to where the shootings are occurring today. It was inevitable that both gangs
would ultimately destroy each other and that is what occurred, along with a long
overdue police crackdown on gang and drug offences.

Many of the gangsters died,were arrested and imprisoned or simply disappeared off the
face of the earth and as a result a war zone turned into a tourist hot spot.                   

However, these recent shootings in Sydney are occurring in a much wider area
of the city and they appear not to be confined to just two gangs. From what I have read     
and been told, the numbers of young men in southwest  Sydney that either carry or   
have access to handguns is simply staggering.

But what alarms me more,as a former detective who witnessed first-hand the
explosion in Cabramatta, is that the current shooting incidents can occur anywhere
and at anytime across south-west Sydney and for a multitude of reasons — not
just related to drug turf wars.
That anyone in certain areas of our city can quickly access a handgun to then use in a
minor dispute signals a clear and present danger to all of Sydney.

Cabramatta's problems were the result of years of neglect by police commanders
and a refusal to acknowledge the problem, let alone rectify it. That does not appear to be
 the case in southwest Sydney today where huge police resources are being applied.
Yet still they are having little deterrent effect.

To some extent, the shootings in southwest Sydney are also a legacy of the
previous government, which almost succeeded in ompletely disabling our  police force. 
It is slowly getting back on its feet but it is still very much a work in progress.                       

But at some point in time,the O'Farrell government will run out of excuses as to why _
they have been unable to curb this seemingly endless saga of gun-related crime. There is
also little or no chance that the Gillard government will be able to come up with a long-
term meaningful solution to this alarming epidemic.

So NSW will have to go it alone and they should be able to, given that they were given
the biggest mandate to govern in Australian electoral history almost two years ago.

The first thing Barry O'Farrell has to realise is that  none of the measures being
used now are having any impact on the gun violence problems here in Sydney.

There is no deterrent either from policing strategies and certainly none from the courts,
and therein lies the problem.

It's time to think outside the square and invent new strategies. I would start with
the NSW Crime Commission which has recently undergone a long needed re-invigoration
by Police Minister Mike Gallacher.The Crime Commission needs to be at the
forefront of measures taken to prevent and deter the south-western gangster mentality
that continues to attract a never-ending source of impressionable young men.

The commission operates almost entirely in a shroud of secrecy and for operational
reasons this must continue but consideration has to be given to also allow it to hold public
hearings just as the ICAC and the PIC do.

When gangsters are brought before the crime commission they are interrogated behind closed doors and no one apart from crime commission staff, police and defence lawyers know who they are. It's time that perhaps the cloak of anonymity that protects these thugs was lifted so the whole of Sydney can know who they are and where they operate.

We do this to corrupt cops and politicians so why not expose murders, gun runners and drug dealers in the same way? We might then see a new spirit of co-operation from previously reluctant neighbours and relatives who have vital information on specific incidents involving said gangsters.

There will be the usual screeching from the civil libertarians and defence lawyers but very few of them actually live in southwest Sydney and most probably think a drive-by is a McDonald's outlet.

The other more costly alternative is to hold a special commission of inquiry into organised crime in southwest Sydney and publicly expose anyone connected to the insidious trade in illegal drugs,firearms and its associated
violence.

 "It's time to lift the veil of secrecy surrounding crime families,whose very existence is often nurtured inadvertently bylaws meant to protect the average law abiding citizen."

The secrecy surrounding police operations into organised crime has its limitations, particularly if the evidence against these suspects falls short of the required criminal proofs needed for prosecutions. It's time to lift the veil of secrecy surrounding crime families,whose very existence is often nurtured inadvertently by laws meant to protect the average law abiding citizen.
The new consorting laws have to be relentlessly and ruthlessly applied by a dedicated police task ferce similar to those successfully used in the US to hunt down and prosecute hard to get felons.

And despite delivering the government's pre-election promise of record police numbers, there are by international standards,simply not enough police in NSW and, indeed, across the country. While police numbers rise slowly each year,organised crime is flourishing at an alarming rate simply because police resources are stretched to breaking point.



Perhaps a new federal government under Tony Abbott might do a Bill Clinton and federally fund a huge increase in state police numbers as the US President did during the 1990s, which resulted in massive drops in crime rates across America.

If not, the idea of special reserve police officers needs to be considered to bolster full-
time police numbers where and when they are needed.
Part-time cops are used throughout the western world, particularly in the US, and
they are extremely effective and economical.

Northern Ireland had the world renowned B Specials that operated during The Troubles and it could be done here.

What is needed to make our city safe again is innovation, not procrastination, and with his record mandate Barry O'Farrell is in the right place at the right time to leave a lasting legacy and set the standard for the rest of the country. If he doesn't then it is just a matter of years before Sydney becomes the not-so- proud owner of designated bandit zones and no-go areas and no one wants that.

The greatest mistake former PM John Howard ever made, 
Australia's ban on firearms has only ensured that the Non Criminal  / Gang member is unarmed and that it is business as usual for those who tell us daily that their only objective  is to eliminate Judeo Christian Civilization in Australia.

What were known as "South Western Sydney Suburbs" are now in reality, Sydney's Occupied Territories, where armed gangs of predominantly (Pious?) Middle Eastern Muslims roam at will, administering their very own "Cultural Enrichment" of Australia, under the auspicies of the Labor Green Loon's Multiculturalism / Open Borders Policies of Diversity and Cultural Enrichment.
The Australian Labor Party,the Greens, Progressives and their media apologists, tell Australians that we MUST celebrate DIVERSITY.
Gee even if your wife or daughter was gang raped "Leb Style" or your son was shot stabbed or beaten to death by any of the "Progressives" Cultural Enrichment Ambassadors, just think of the fun you and the surviving Infidel members of your family can still have every year at a Labor Green Loon sponsored "Harmony Day" spectacular paid for by YOUR TAXES.


Sitting Ducks



  • 6 shooting fatalities since October
  • 5 shootings this year
  • 187 shootings since Barry O'Farrell was elected


2013
January 22-31-year-old man was shot in the leg while walking near the
intersection of Acacia Ave and Napoleon Rd, Greenacre.

January 20 - 24-year-old man shot in the chest and killed at Cidley
Crescent, Claymore.

January 15 - One man shotand killed, another wounded In the arm
following a shooting at Wetherill Hill at3:50pm.

January 13-Man shot in the stomach and chest at his home in
Homebush in what police believe was a targeted shooting.

January 9 - 32-year-old man sustained a gunshot wound to his
head at Mullaway Bay.

2012
December 30,2012 - 21-year-old man shot in the stomach at Busby

December 24 - 22-year-old man shot in thecal fat Lansvale.

December 2D - Shots fired into a house at Panama. No one injured

December 18 - 28-year-old male shot and killed outside his home in
Punchbowl.

December 18 - Drive-by shooting at a home In Cherrybrook.

December 18 - Shots reportedly fired during an argument in Mosman.

December 18 - A single shot fired into a home in Milperra.

December 4 - Several shots were fired during an altercation between
two men in Auburn.

December 1 - A 23-year-old man attended Auburn Hospital with a
gunshot wound to his right lower leg.

November 29 - Drive-by shooting at a home in Hunter Ave, Lurnea in the
middle of the day. Two men and their mother escaped uninjured.

November 27 - One man killed and other injured after they were shot at
in broad daylight in Leumeah Ave,Punchbowl.

November 21 - Shots fired into home In Edgewater Drive, Bella Vista.

November 21-Shots fired into home in the vicinity of Cranbrook and
Salisbury Rd, Bellevue Hill.

November 21 - Man shot while sitting In car on Andy St,Guildford West.

November 7-Man found sertously injured from gunshot wounds on Rider
Boulevard, Rhodes.

November 5 - Three men shot outside wedding reception at a
function centre on Bareena St, Cahley Vale. A 23-year-old man later died of
his injuries.

October 23 - Shots fired In a home In Busby St,Busby.

October 21 - Shots fired into taxi on Fairmount St, Lakemba.

October 20 - Man shot in face in Newtown.

October 18 - Shots fired into home at Garnett St, Merrylands,

October 18 - Shots fired Into home at Caroline Chisholm Drive at
Winston Hills.

October 14 - One man shot dead and another seriously injured in a daylight
shooting In Greenacre.

October 10 - Double shooting Kfhilla and Rawson streets.Auburn.

October 9 - Shot fired during brawl on Charlton St, Woy Woy.

October 8 - Man suffered shot to his leg George St, Yagoona.

October 4 - Man found with gunshot wound, person charged,
Treuer Pde Bankstown.

October 3 - Man shot in the leg Boythorn Ave and Barnaby,
Ambarvale.


Above post sourced from the Daily Telegraph Saturday 26 Janurary2013 Pgs. 40 & 41

Saturday, January 26, 2013

Liam Knight Fund Raiser Australia Day 2013

Peoples Republic of Canberra the Cocaine Capital of Australia

This article will explain why you can never get any sense out of a Public SERVANT Now REMEMBER why you pay taxes sweat in summer freeze in winter and turn your lights off at night.
Coked up in Canberra

Myles Peterson 
The Daily Telegraph 
January 26, 2013 12:00AM

CANBERRA '13: Stop the Coke. Nothing epitomises the current state of Canberra's economy better than a pair of cocaine-addled public servants spouting unwanted, acronym-laden rants at anyone unfortunate enough to fall within hearing range.



This is not a bad-taste Chaser joke. It is a real and regular occurrence, repeated across Canberra's bars and clubs on any given weekend.

This year, Canberra's local government will sacrifice a mountain of public cash (both local and federal) on the altar of celebrating itself. Hired spinmeisters have already labelled the expenditure a necessary, no, inspired act designed to bring a sense of pride in the nation's capital to all Australians.

When it first came into being, the Australian federal government employed 40,000 public servants, three-quarters of them postal workers. Since then the rise of Canberra's working-rich executive class has been arrow swift.

Today, the federal government boasts a quarter of a million employees, augmented by tens of thousands of public servants who report to the Australian Capital Territory government directly. Chances are, statistically speaking, most of them earn more than you do.

The Australian public service is graded in paramilitary fashion, complete with enlisted and officer ranks. But unlike the army, there are no longer any privates.

While the entry-level position of administrative service officer grade one (ASO1) still exists on paper, operationally, there are none. ASO4 represents the starting point for the majority of newly-minted public servants.

In the absence of junior positions, ASO levels 4 to 6 perform the role of worker bee, average salary $60,000 to $80,000. They keep the records, file the files, stamp the stamps and carry out orders handed down by the executive.

Above the ASO corporals and sergeants sit the executive classes, the "officers" who make up one quarter of the entire federal public service. One particular band, executive level one, or EL1, recently multiplied like a virus. An EL1 commands a salary of at least $100,000 (excluding incentives, allowances for parking, technology, travel, living away from home and the many, many junkets).

Between 2001 and 2011 the number of EL1s grew by more than 100 per cent - an epidemic of highly paid bureaucrats for whom million-dollar homes, a coastal holiday house and the odd cocaine binge are well within their price range. Thanks to the EL1 scourge, low-paid Canberrans suffer just as much as the public purse in a city labelled the 12th most expensive in the world in 2012 by Eurocost International.

EL1 bloat and the laissez-faire attitude to spending taxpayer dollars that underpins it has warped the entire Canberran economy. Utility prices are obscene. Housing prices worse.

Cashing in on the torrents of taxpayer cash flowing on to Canberra's gold-paved streets, local retailers and supermarkets charge prices found only in South Yarra and Vaucluse. Low-paid Canberrans have been steadily priced out of the city. Students cannot afford to rent anywhere, often taking drastic measures just to put a roof over their head. Many visiting undergraduates flee long before completing first year.

Savvy former public servants have taken the exploitation to absurd, some would argue corrupt, levels. Government-owned land is selectively released to cartels of ex-bureaucrats, who then make out like bandits on-selling postage stamp-sized blocks to Canberra's housing-desperate underclasses.

Panels, the only way to bid for a government contract, are stacked with insiders, making it impossible for outsiders to even put in a bid, no matter the competitiveness of the tender.

Canberra's elite regularly host opera events for themselves in a $100 million artificial forest, doomed to burn should the firestorm of 2003 - which cleared the site in the first place - ever return.

Dependant on government advertising for much of its revenue, local media rarely draws attention to these problems, themselves addicted to the public purse as a last remaining source of revenue.

Cocaine busts in Canberra have been spiralling upwards. Late last year, kilos of the stuff was discovered within just 1km of Parliament House. If frequent police and Customs claims that only 1 to 2 per cent of the illicit drug trade is uncovered are to be believed, hundreds of kilos, with a street value gauged in the millions, are potentially wandering the capital's streets looking for cashed-up buyers.

Canberra is a beautiful city. Hectares of manicured lawns and small forests surrounded by august and occasionally gaudy architecture. Life expectancy is world-first. Warped by the executive bubble, average incomes soar higher than any other city in Australia.

But that beauty disguises a dirty secret. Canberra rides a wave of federal money with only the not-so-focused eyes of our federal politicians to keep it in check. Canberra will never go bankrupt. It obeys no economic rules bar those loosely and ineffectively imposed upon it. Failure is measured in charts and spin and the quiet, oft unreported tones of a minister dumping an initiative, program or entire department, not commercial failure and bankruptcy.

Whichever coalition seizes government at this year's federal election, Liberals and Nationals or Labor and Greens, they would perform the Australian taxpayer, and many of the people and small businesses of Canberra, a great service by conducting a root-and-branch review of the country's public service.

Stopping the rorts, stopping the scams, stopping the EL1 scourge would benefit every Australian except those currently benefiting. And for pity's sake, Ms Gillard, Mr Abbott, whoever should prevail, please: Stop the coke.

Myles Peterson is a Canberra-based writer. Twitter: @MylesPeterson

Australia Day 2013





Egypt, Black America's "New Jesus" Hussein Obama's Arab Spring or just another streaming pile of Muslim Terrorist SHIT?


Atlas Shrugs, Pamela Geller proven RIGHT again


SIGN IN TAHRIR SQUARE: 'OBAMA YOU JERK, MUSLIM BROTHERHOODS ARE KILLING THE EGYPTIANS'...



"Read the rest of the sign. Will the media cover this? Never. Are they culpable? You bet they are. They are shamelessly carrying water for jihadists and a President who is advancing the most brutal, bloody and extreme ideology on the face of the earth."




Blog Archive

Contributors