THE PROBLEM IS ISLAM. (PART 1)
POSTED BY ANN BARNHARDT - MARCH 21, AD 2011 1:34 PM MST
It’s time again for me to lay down in writing a simple, obvious truth that everyone else is just too terrified to state. This is another one of
those essays that will serve to permanently disqualify me from any vocation except self-employment for the duration of my life. So hold on
to your pantyhose and put out the cat, because you know this is going to be a good read.
The issue is the muslim world. Libya. Was it right for Obama to FINALLY make a decision and move our military assets into the Libyan
theater? Should we be intervening in Yemen? Should we lend tangible support to the Iranian opposition? What should have been done
differently in Egypt? Was Mubarak better than a “democratically” installed Sharia theocracy? What are we supposed to be doing in all of this?
Who are we supposed to be rooting for? There has to be a “right answer”, and there has to be a correct course of action in all of this.
The reason why no one can come to anything that remotely approaches a definitive “right answer” to this problem is because no one has the
balls to acknowledge what the problem is. The problem is not a lack of democracy. As we are clearly seeing now, and as history repeatedly
confirms, the most evil political systems ever seen on earth have ascended to power with the support of more than 50% of the populace.
Therefore, democracy, or any form of representative government can not, in and of itself, be the “right answer”. The only way we are ever
going to arrive at the right answer is if we first ask and honestly answer the following question: What exactly is the problem?
The problem is islam.
Let me say that again so that there is absolutely no confusion. The problem is islam. So long as islam exists on earth, there will be no
peace, and there will be no freedom for those trapped inside of it. So long as islam exists, it will continue to stir up violence, aggression,
war, terrorism, instability, injustice, human slavery, hopelessness, suffering, despair and unnatural, needless death. Why? BECAUSE THAT
IS WHAT IT WAS DESIGNED TO DO. All of those qualities are intrinsic, constitutive qualities of islam. It is a satanic system that was
specifically created to be the Enemy’s response to Christ.
Mohammed did not hear a voice which he transcribed and called “the koran”. He simply sat down and wrote out a political manifesto –
claiming in fully calculated deceit that it was divine - that would enable him to raise an army. There was nothing miraculous about the origin
of islam in that sense. One of the obvious confirmations of this is the quality of the prose itself. If “allah” actually wrote the koran and
mohammed merely transcribed it, then allah is an idiot with exceptionally poor language and composition skills. The koran reads as if it
were written by a mentally deranged, barely literate Bedouin pedophile pirate con-artist . . . because it was. BUT, the system itself and the
spirit of inspiration behind it is completely satanic. Islam and the koran are completely satanic in the same sense that Marxism and “The
Communist Manifesto” are satanic, and in the same sense that Nazism and “Mein Kampf” are satanic. Oh, yes. The Serpent is subtle. Satan
does his best work when he is merely “whispering” subconscious inspiration to fallen men. Given that islam has persisted for 1400 years and
now enslaves a quarter of the human population, it is clearly satan’s masterpiece.
Given this reality, there are exactly two tactical options for the civilized world to choose from.
1. Completely isolate the muslim world. Let them have their caliphate but in a state of total quarantine.
This would involve establishing massive physical perimeter barriers on land and maintaining blockades at sea for all muslim territories.
Presumably this would stretch from Morocco to Indonesia, and would be massively expensive both to construct and secure. In addition to
this, all muslims would have to be expelled from all civilized nations and forcibly returned to muslim territory. In order for this to work, all
civilized nations on earth would have to unite in solidarity against islam and cooperate fully and completely in building, maintaining and
securing the borders.
Additionally, the quarantine would have to be TOTAL, meaning absolutely no interaction – including economic interaction. Therefore, before
this strategy could be undertaken, the civilized world would need to completely free itself of any dependence on oil pumped from muslim
territory.
Further, this strategy, while appearing to be the most “non-violent” option is actually the most violent, and would be a de facto death
sentence, both physically and spiritually, for every person trapped inside the caliphate. Assuming that the perimeter could be constructed
and then sealed, the muslim culture would necessarily begin to murder and consume itself. Remember, islam is violence, aggression, war,
terrorism, instability, injustice, human slavery, hopelessness, suffering, despair and unnatural, needless death. If muslims aren’t in a
position to kill “infidels”, they will simply turn on each other. This is already a proven fact, and has been for 1400 years. Sunni and Shia
muslims have been at each other’s throats all along, and still are today. Only in very rare instances, such as the wars of aggression begun by
muslims called “the Crusades”, wherein muslim unity was needed to fight the “infidels”, has there been any real muslim unity. Because
islam has no central authority or magesterium, unlike Christianity which was specifically established by Christ Himself with a divinely
protected structure of authority and infallible teaching charism, islam allows for every single self-ordained “imam” to be his own “pope”
who can then alter, decide and concoct “doctrine”, and to also issue “fatwas” against any competing cleric, or entire groups of people.
Islam has been specifically designed to discourage unity, thus always fomenting and encouraging conflicts and wars within the caliphate
itself.
Next, islam is incapable of supporting a vibrant economy. Islam teaches that all human endeavors and productivity are contrary to the will of
allah. Any person who spends any time or effort doing anything except studying the koran and praying to allah is an infidel. Additionally,
islam teaches that the only way that a person can be GUARANTEED of “salvation” or “paradise” is to die in jihad. Therefore, muslims will
ALWAYS be in a state of war against someone, including other muslims, because if there were total peace, there would be no means to
achieve “salvation” according to muslim teaching.
Finally, the quarantine option would be a failure in charity on the part of Christendom. By quarantining these people, we would be giving up
on them, which is the opposite of charity, or love. Quarantined muslims would have absolutely no chance or hope of hearing the Gospel, and
would have no hope of ever escaping the cult of islam. While this option might serve to help keep our hands physically clean, we would have
the spiritual stain of our failure in charity to answer for upon our judgement
THE PROBLEM IS ISLAM. (PART 2)
POSTED BY ANN BARNHARDT - MARCH 21, AD 2011 1:32 PM MST
This brings us to option #2, which is actually the more viable and certainly the more loving and charitable option.
2. Fight a Final Crusade and exterminate islam from the face of the earth once and for all.
Yep. I said it, and I mean it. This option isn’t really an “option” at all, because this is where we are heading whether we like it or not. There
is going to be a massive, final war between islam and the civilized world at some point. The only real question is, how long are we going to
stall it off? A week? A month? A year? A decade? A century? Some would argue that the Final Crusade actually began on 9/11, and that we
have been fighting minor skirmishes ever since. Perhaps. If that is the case, the civilized world clearly does not understand that it is in a
fight for its very survival. There isn’t room enough in this world for both human civilization AND islam. One side is going to be destroyed by
the other. If islam wins, then humanity will be dead as well, because it will be just a matter of time before islam consumes itself, as
outlined above. If civilization wins, humanity will continue, knowledge and technology will increase, there will be joy and laughter and
goodness, and human beings will be free to seek and find God. In this way, islam is exactly like cancer. Either a person destroys the cancer
within them and survives, or the cancer wins and both the person AND the cancer die. Given that the civilized world still doesn’t understand
what is going on, I don’t think it is fair to say that the Final Crusade has begun. It will begin when we comprehend that it is us or them – kill
or be killed. Let’s do a quick exercise in linguistics which will prove that extermination of the islamic political system is the only real,
practical and charitable option that we have.
Consider the following statement:
The Nazi Party, its philosophy and goal set was evil and had to be stopped. There is no room for the Nazi philosophy in a civilized world, and
thus the only acceptable outcome of World War II was the total extermination of the Nazi Party. While the main objective of fighting World
War II was to repel and then exterminate the Nazi scourge from overrun nations, the secondary objective was also to liberate the German
people themselves from the bonds of the totalitarian Nazi regime.
Now, let’s look at the same statement, but replace “Nazi” with “muslim”:
Islam, its philosophy and goal set is evil and has to be stopped. There is no room for the muslim philosophy in a civilized world, and thus the
only acceptable outcome of the Final Crusade is the total extermination of islam. While the main objective of fighting the Final Crusade is
to repel and then exterminate the muslim scourge from overrun nations, the secondary objective is also to liberate the currently-muslim
people themselves from the bonds of the totalitarian muslim caliphate.
The two statements are pluperfect analogues because Nazism and islam are pluperfect analogues. Both are TOTALITARIAN POLITICAL
SYSTEMS. The only tactical difference is that mohammed used the beard of religion and claimed divine inspiration right out of the gate.
This has allowed islam to use civilization’s own freedom of religious conscience principle against it. Hitler was indeed trying to slowly create
a new pagan religion, with the German/Aryan nation cast as “the father”, Hitler himself cast as “the son” and the “messiah”, and the Nazi
Party as “the holy spirit”, but was never far enough along in that process to be able to wield the accusation of “intolerance”. To illustrate
this point, let’s reverse our linguistic example:
Islam is a religion and thus is equal to all other religions. Islam is protected under the First Amendment, and all civilized people must fight
to defend a person’s right to practice islam completely unencumbered. Islam seeks only peace through the voluntary application of Sharia
law. Just because some muslims have used violence as a way of advancing their cause does not mean that all muslims are violent. Violence
is a perversion of true Islamic philosophy. Most muslims are peace-loving, and we should support and embrace them into our culture.
Now, the same statement, but replacing “muslim” with “Nazi”.
Nazism is a religion and thus is equal to all other religions. Nazism is protected under the First Amendment, and all civilized people must
fight to defend a person’s right to practice Nazism completely unencumbered. Nazism seeks only peace through the voluntary application of
the laws of the Third Reich. Just because some Nazis have used violence as a way of advancing their cause does not mean that all Nazis are
violent. Violence is a perversion of true Nazi philosophy. Most Nazis are peace-loving, and we should support and embrace them in our
culture.
Have I made my point?
(Aside: How long do you think it will take some leftist to pull that last paragraph, put my name over it as the author, and then claim that
they have proof that I am a Nazi? That’s how these sad, pathetic people roll. It WILL happen. It’s just a matter of how long it takes them to
do it. C’est la vie.)
We don’t flinch at the reality of Nazism, nor at the necessity to exterminate it from the face of the earth, because we accurately call it what
it is: a totalitarian political system. But because we have been brainwashed and conditioned by the left to self-loathe our own
Judeo-Christian culture, reject critical thinking, and embrace islam as a constitutionally-protected religion, we refuse to acknowledge the
plain, simple fact there will be no peace unless and until islam is exterminated from the face of the earth. We keep telling ourselves that
“democracy” is the answer and that if we just facilitate voting in muslim countries, everything will be fine, and the entire world will be
enveloped in peace, rainbows, gumdrops and unicorn farts. Because all “religions” are good and equal, and anyone who says different is a
bigot and an intolerant hater.
There is going to be a war. A big one. Probably the biggest ever. But it has to be fought, because the stakes are no less than the fate of the
entire human race. The problem is islam. There is no such thing as a "healthy muslim society" because islam is a cancer upon human
civilization. The solution is nothing less than the complete extermination of the muslim political system in order to save the people inside of
it. If you have a cancerous tumor, you cut it out - you don't try to fix the person while simultaneously protecting the tumor. We have done
this before. We did this just seventy short years ago. We CAN do it again. All we need is the courage to face the truth, and the fortitude to
do what we know we must.
Thanks to Teri for the above
![CO2 TAX_thumb[2]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjTF8WrPuq5VDT1RovFvKqSnwohEpvF9IgBJRCFdfZbV33JXpKe47gRSWudrrGH_18Ip_DsrNnIg8rYbLkB26qA-_09fNRoVqFs8Vruy_9p2LYhyphenhyphenAqmjGHQpUD4nmHx8X7V0cK6/s1600-h/CO2%20TAX_thumb%5B2%5D%5B3%5D.png "CO2 TAX_thumb[2]")
